Originally posted by manxman2

Originally posted by northwoods
Unfortunately this claim is hoax. Fortunately, news about us even false ones promote closer contact - even this one.

Someone know, someone believe, someone afraid, someone denies and someone don't care but it does not change the truth that man is not alone.

In macroperspective reason is simple, in microperspective there are hundreds of components that does not meet the requirements of successful contact between outsiders and indigenous. Mismatching components are mostly in field of: social, religious, political and biological hazard. First three are most complicated to resolve - we can't come to public and say hello without consequences to those components.

There is a lot of them with an internal flame that deeply wants to meet the outsiders. That time will come but not now.

Many of you don't understand that our manifesto can't be seen yet. Not every human is ready. Appearance on the public domain would be very fatal to mankind. Social system is too fragile and detached from the scientific context. Systems and cultures, history and the support structures is strongly tied to beliefs that drives every day on Earth.

Experience has shown in history and with other civilizations that the interference with indigenous population cause steep global-context contrast between them. Involuntary confrontation is a risk of appearance that can't be taken yet.

ah right the prime directive in otherwords.

you watch too much telly my alien friend.

Originally posted by northwoods
So you are thinking that watching TV is not good. What's wrong with the TV?

I have red hundreds of books (belletristic, fiction, non-fiction) including the good ones. and I can say that literature is overrated. I agree that doing too much something is not good. Could you explain how you can assume from my earlier message that I'm watching too much TV?
[edit on 18-10-2009 by northwoods]

Originally posted by xelamental

Read your message again and pick the errors. You have to understand the rules before you can enjoy the game.

Originally posted by northwoods

Originally posted by manxman2

Originally posted by northwoods
Unfortunately this claim is hoax. Fortunately, news about us even false ones promote closer contact - even this one.

Someone know, someone believe, someone afraid, someone denies and someone don't care but it does not change the truth that man is not alone.

In macroperspective reason is simple, in microperspective there are hundreds of components that does not meet the requirements of successful contact between outsiders and indigenous. Mismatching components are mostly in field of: social, religious, political and biological hazard. First three are most complicated to resolve - we can't come to public and say hello without consequences to those components.

There is a lot of them with an internal flame that deeply wants to meet the outsiders. That time will come but not now.

Many of youdon't understand that our manifesto can't be seen yet. Not every human is ready. Appearance on the public domain would be very fatal to mankind. Social system is too fragile and detached from the scientific context. Systems and cultures, history and the support structures is strongly tied to beliefs that drives every day on Earth.

Experience has shown in history and with other civilizations that the interference with indigenous population cause steep global-context contrast between them. Involuntary confrontation is a risk of appearance that can't be taken yet.

ah right the prime directive in otherwords.

you watch too much telly my alien friend.

So you are thinking that watching TV is not good. What's wrong with the TV? I have red hundreds of books (belletristic, fiction, non-fiction) including the good ones. and I can say that literature is overrated. I agree that doing too much something is not good. Could you explain how you can assume from my earlier message that I'm watching too much TV?



[edit on 18-10-2009 by northwoods]

Originally posted by Dave157

but multiple sources are putting their credit on the line claiming this.

Originally posted by northwoods

Originally posted by xelamental

Read your message again and pick the errors. You have to understand the rules before you can enjoy the game.

Ok. I understand the misapprehension now. My previous message contains cognate context what you mean by "prime directive". Term is citation from science fiction literature and since living generation seems to receive information more via TV than literature it is entitled presumption to say that I'm watching too much TV. Of course you do not have enough information about me to contradict my behavior in this matter so there are no other errors to pick than spelling.