Of course, since the Indian culture has been basically wiped out, we have to rely on the reports of a few observers who might have missed something.
But let's assume they're right, that the Indians had an exemplary culture in which they were dignified, honest, caring, supportive of one another,
and so on.
That culture didn't survive. The culture that used violence survived. I'm not saying that the violent culture was better. It was not. It was
just better suited to survive and perpetuate itself. That's what happened, and is still happening.
Natural selection is still happening, though perhaps we ought to call it "unnatural" selection. Survival of the fittest - but "fittest" for what?
Fittest for survival. That's all. Not the best; not the noblest; not the most worthy. Just the ones who manage to outlast the rest.
I think this world is something like a filter, that only lets a certain range of people survive and thrive. Those who are very debased - the
criminals, the thugs, those who cannot fit in with society - those tend not to thrive. They are sent to prison, executed, murdered, or simply
shunned. The very fine people - the very sensitive, noble, honest, peaceful ones - also don't do well. They don't have the willingness to elbow in
for their share of resources.
Only the middle group, those who can cooperate for the most part, but who also have enough self-interest to shove their way forward to make sure they
get their share - those are the ones who make it, and who carry on from generation to generation.
I think some people are just too good for this world.


