Why would anyone take us seriously?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 40 times


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 04:01 PM by Enigma Publius
reply to post by SaturnFX



i completely agree with you. I never said (as someone suggested) that the topics themselves should be regulated, i do like the variety of views, but that's besides the point. as you have said better than i could, the nature of this site must allow for the outrageous to be discussed as well. I do still feel that if you are creating a thread to try and bring about a change in something that bothers you, then try to shy away from thread titles that will scare away your target audience. But if you don't really expect to change anyone's mind with a thread, maybe you only seek to vent, or seek validation from like minded people, then pay no attention to the volitile nature of the title.
It's the very way that we discuss the material that i think should have some form of conduct. you gave the perfect example in your post. star for you!
publius


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 04:13 PM by JonInMichigan
There is a fine line between insanity and genius. They thought Einstein was nuts when he proposed the concept that time had to be flexible rather than universal and static, as was previously believed, to solve the problems scientists were having with the inconsistencies of relativity in his day. When he came up with Special Relativity he suffered much ridicule by the scientific community. He was considered nuts and a wack job for many years afterward. Eventually he was proven correct… just ask the people in Hiroshima or the fact that they have to account for temporal effects of special relativity on the space shuttle.

There are many instances of people espousing wild theories throughout history, only later to be proven correct. Granted 99.99% of those crazy theories are just that, crazy. I read ATS shaking my head 99.99% of the time, waiting for that 0.01% where someone is really on to something. They are out there or none of us would keep coming back. It’s painful, yes, but we wait for the payoff, when it occasionally comes along.


The two paragraphs above summarize the only point I was trying to make but while I’m at it, I want to air a grievance that I have on this topic of who is “crazy” and who isn’t. Read on at your discretion.

My biggest problem with people’s crazy claims is that anytime someone like me, who actually IS a scientist and engineer working in a key position in defense, sheds some light on a relevant topic that I happen to be an expert on, the “morons and crazies” out there call me a liar or nuts. It’s very frustrating. I don’t dare mention security clearances or inside information I gain from high-ranking military or politicians, because people will instantly run me down the river. Why? I mean, here I am, one of the actual non-crazies, who IS in the know on certain things but if I dare open my mouth I’m immediately attacked.

In addition to my scientific background I have actually spent a significant amount of time in my life pounding the pavement doing research on UFOs and other paranormal topics, but dare I open my mouth, I am smacked down by 100 people who have NOTHING to offer but regurgitated crap from other websites. This atmosphere does NOT invite intelligent or well-read people to participate. These days I usually just sit and read and keep my mouth shut. So if one looks for the 0.01% posts that are well thought out and intelligent, they may be even harder to find due to the fact that real data gets attacked harshly. Why? Because people can’t verify one’s claims by searching for them in Google? Well duh! It’s good information because it HASN’T been brought to the table before and won’t necessarily be verifiable.

The few times I have jumped into conversations regarding science, I’m told to shut up by people who admit they have no more than a high school knowledge of physics. As far as I can tell, that’s why there are almost no “experts” to be found commenting on ATS. People like Stanton Friedman or Steven Hawkings will never be found commenting on ATS, although they are sited in sources all the time. There have actually been instances where topics have been raised regarding military technology that I designed. I tried to shed a little light on the topic and people said, “yeah sure…. like we believe you worked on that…shut up…go away…etc” Well that’s just great, you just turned away the one person who actually knew what they were talking about (on a particular topic). Then the forum went right back to babbling on with empty conjecture and nonsense while I sit here at my desk looking at the actual design blueprints. Really moronic huh?

I have invited people who doubted me to come down here to my work. I’d be glad to greet you in the lobby and show you my credentials. That’s as far as I can bring you of course, but then maybe then you won’t crap all over a clearly qualified opinion.

Once I got so ticked off because I was called a liar about something I had discussed with a US senator that I finally actually posted a picture of her and I sitting in the actual meeting talking together where we discussed it, much to the risk of revealing my identity, I wanted to prove that I wasn’t full of crap. After proving that I actually was for real, my opponent came back with a remark along the lines that I must not be trusted because I was PART of the thing. You really can’t win with these jerks. I mean, here I am, trying to help further a discussion with really good information, and I’m not believed, then when I am believed I’m told I can’t be trusted because I’m too close to it. It’s pure insanity. How does anyone ever expect to get any intelligent people posting with that sort of attitude? Anyway, this is my first post in a long time and I’ll be going back to keeping my mouth shut and just reading.


That’s my two cents. (Second line. lol)

Edited typos.


[edit on 14-10-2009 by JonInMichigan]


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 04:15 PM by Enigma Publius
reply to post by DaMod



maybe you can help me find a word for something i'm trying to describe. I did go back and read the thread about "religion must die" after the earlier talk, and it's a good article with a lot of good points in it that i agree with even. But, the title itself is going to make a lot of folks who NEED to read it (IMO anyway) turn the other way. Is there a word for describing a situation like that? Where the content inside something is much more serious and thought out than the headline implies? I only ask because it bothers me now. it is a skunk works title with some great ATS material inside, and i just want to know why one would choose to lose potential readers that way. I mean, i'm not even religious, but i saw that title and thought "oh me, another nut. What else is there?"
am i saying we should not be allowed to name them however we want? NO! The only thngs i think we shouldn't allow is the name calling and 2nd line people, and those who just swear for the sake of it, things like that. The OP of that post should OF COURSE be able to name it however they choose, and they should be able to make ANY thread just about, but i do want to get people thinking about their audience when they create threads here. It would be nice if we all tried to steer towards reaching those who have not yet woke up, instead of alienating them, laughing smugly at the embers from bridges burning behind us. Anyone still thinking that i am calling for a boring facts-only news site should know that that is far from true. I just want us to act like the intelligent community that i believe we are.
publius


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 04:38 PM by Enigma Publius
Originally posted by SiNDADDY
i understand the reason for the OP's post and i agree with a lot of what the post is saying, BUT, it is the agenda or manipulation that i am completely not down with.

"this website would suit ME better by MY beliefs on how it should be if eveyrbody acted this certain way that i wish them to act."

okay...



free speech rules.

we have people of every kind in the world and probably on this site.

if you want it your way...

go make a website and moderate it, instead of coming into what somebody else is working hard for and trying to say how it should "be" for it to be taken "seriously" (and in your opinion only)

i ask you, who do you think this website is trying to "impress" if you think it is scaring away so many dear people?

i could go on about many other things i foung wrong with this, quoting lines and so on, but i think:

make a website and moderate it

is the best answer for you.

rocknroll,

S




this is just not true. i don't see myself as anyone who "knows better" or want a site to suit me. I want a site that does not have people with elitist views that because we are "in the know" then we are better than those who are not. How is this anything resembling your statements about me? If it was made to MY liking, i would likely be the only person interested in it. I think you have misunderstood my intentions. I hold free speech dear to me. I am saying that this site's motto is "deny ignorance" so we should practice it or find somewhere else to flame, as one person said, that is why god made youtube. Maybe my feelings were lost in translation, i admit that i do have trouble getting ideas across fluently. (sp?) I only state that this is one of the biggest reasons that poeple shy away from ATS and flock to other sites. It's also one of the biggest reasons why, when i am talking with someone who is a "square" (just humor me and allow the term) and we are discussing say, water ice and clouds on mars, as soon as they hear i learned anything from ATS, they discredit me immeadiately because of the way we conduct ourselves here sometimes. Do i NEED THAT VALIDATION? NO! i want to get that out the way right now because i KNOW some of you will say something to that effect, but it does bother me that whatever good input i may have to help wake this person up and at least make them question some things goes right out the window as soon as they hear ATS.
My thread here is selfish only in that i want the world to be more aware of what is happening around them, and i want that for everybody. Those who are not yet on board still are equals to me, i am not better than them as a person. Yes, the term sheeple is quite accurate, but we should watch when and how we use it, because we might be inhibiting them to stay that way if we are not careful.
The site IS growing, and that does mean more opinions that are off the wall or what have you, that is inevitable. But we should be aware of our behavior even more so now that we have more ears to speak to.
i am not asking anyone to dumb themselves down, i only ask that we keep this intelligent rather. Why is that viewed as selfish? I feel that your response that i start my own site and make the rules is pretty silly. I just want us to practice what we preach.
DENY IGNORANCE
publius


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 04:50 PM by Enigma Publius
Originally posted by lifecitizen
Well, I used the word suck just the other day here- but having read this thread I do agree that kind of thing lowers the tone of the place.

I have also probably not been on my best behaviour here and quite often lose patience with some of the more pushy christians and tend to take the mickey- I could maybe take a look at that.

One of the things I've found with ATS is because of the star and flag option we have people who actually ask others to star and flag their thread- I get embarrased for them and if I was thinking about star and flagging it I don't- whilst I appreciate their efforts I dont feel they should ask- people will either flag it or they won't- it makes me feel they are only putting the effort in to get the kudos.

But anyway to the OP, I will do my bit to try and keep ATS a great place for others to visit- I think it's a great site.

thanks for contributing! I also just want to clarify that i could use a little work in this area also, i never said i was a perfect shining example, but we should all try. ALSO:
this is starting to get away from me. By my examples of headlines that may turn some people away, i gave the impression (it would seem) that i think some articles are worthless and should be left out for the "crazies". this is not so and i want to clear that up. this thread is not about the threads and how ridiculous they are vs. the ones that aren't. That can only come down to matters of opinion. No i only ask that we use the same manners and civility for discussing ALL KINDS. i say there is room here for just about any thread topic, but no room for telling someone

"you are stupid for believing in faeires. Second line"

or

"Everyone knows faeries exist you dumba**"

i don't want to have impact on the topics we use, that is what this site is good for, the differences and all. I only want us to stay intelligent whatever topic we discuss.
So please, write replies that say i am selfish and want to control the content here all you want, just understand that it's not true. I don't want to control the topics at all, i just want us all to remember that we DO have an audience, and you should not be expecting someone to give you any credibility when acting so childish. Does that make sense? I am trying so hard to get my feelings across here, but it's difficult to tell if I have done a good job with all these replies coming in saying that i should go somewhere else or start my own site. feedback is always welcome!


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 05:11 PM by Enigma Publius
reply to post by concernedcitizan



i know right? I looked up his other posts, and it seems to be a hobby of his, posting silly things.
but, what can you do eh?
i'm really pleased for the most part, these replies have all been very well thought out, and presented in an intelligent way...i am lovin it.
thank you to everyone who is contributing.
publius


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 05:17 PM by concernedcitizan
reply to post by Enigma Publius


It's a shame your going to catch all sorts of flak for your thoughtful post. I'm no saint. I've posted things here that i thought for sure would get me in trouble. This is what happens though when you get some, not all, but some self righteous, humorless and judgmental people in one place. No one wants to back down or apologize. Some people see it as a form of weakness to do that. Good post. I'm going to try and improve my own manners. Have a great day.



reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 05:30 PM by dizziedame
reply to post by Enigma Publius

On page three you say "feed back is welcome". You did not welcome my feedback to you.

Instead you insulted me and called me an elitist.

I was not rude to you. I told you I appreciated your concern.

I am truly sorry you had a troubled youth and still are troubled according to your own words, not mine.

When did I say or imply I was better than most people? Please show me this.

FYI: I am not a guy. I am a 62 year old woman who was a successful business woman and was able to sell my business and retire in 2007.

I still maintain that it is not a members job to lecture other members. That's what we have moderators for. They do their job well.

If something upsets you in a post just press the alert button and you should get results.

In 3 years I've only used the alert once. I ran across a thread that had a fully nude picture of the poster in all his glory. Even though he had little to brag about I felt it was inappropriate for the site.

The thread was immediately removed thanks to the fast action of the mod hammer.

When I referred to my Dad as my Pappy I was trying to add humor. Well I sure didn't make you laugh.

Please feel free to U2U me as I have worked with youth for many years.

I want to be your friend. I just didn't like your lecture.

If I can be of any help to you please do contact me. I'm really a very nice old woman that doesn't like to argue. Just don't insult me or put me in a defensive position.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Main Stream Media Taking It To Far!!
  Posted 19 days ago with 22 member flags
Iranian Aircraft Carriers in the Gulf of Mexico
  Posted 13 days ago with 10 member flags
A few questions for those of you who hate the Confederate flag
  Posted 15 days ago with 9 member flags
Why Do You Insist On Doing This?
  Posted 6 days ago with 9 member flags
The System Doesn\'t Own You: Exit Strategies (w/ video)
  Posted 6 days ago with 8 member flags
Getting off of oil.
  Posted 15 days ago with 7 member flags