reply to post by redoubt
well aas for the "kick me" sign, oh well, i can take it. I fully encourage anyone who doesn't like my views to tell me so, i have no issue
whatsoever with someone's opinion being different than mine. But the thing is, it's not JUST mine, these are the non spoken rules of debate. I was
never on a debate team, but i am sure that part of being taken seriously is conducting yourself in an intelligent manner. Can anyone argue with
that?
i used to have the same opinion as you, that basicly everyone is entitled to an opinion and can express it however they choose, and i still believe
that. What i am saying is, it goes deeper. SUre, you can say it however you wish, but that doesn't mean anyone will listen. To get people to
listen (especially people who hold a radically different opinion) you must stay somewhat cival and intelligent. Our site motto is deny ignorance
right? Does that not include helping others become enlightened? Or are we satisfied with our numbers and now we want to alienate ourselves from the
rest of the world? Is there ever too much TRUTH? Is there not always room for more? By acting childish and saying things like "anyone who still
believes the official 9/11 story is an idiot" we are virtually guranteeing that that individual will never come around. It may seem very obvious to
us, i know it does to me, that something is wrong with the official story, but a lot of folks just have not been exposed to enough (or any) compelling
evidence. Why would anyone support the idea of acting like a 6th grader and the name calling?
phrases like "the 9/11 official story is bullsh!t" does NOT make you look like a credible source. You are acting exacly how the secrecy agenda
wants you to act, you are playing right into their hands. Can't ya'll see that? They don't need disinfo agents, you do the work for them!
and as for the comment that maybe that is the only way to get someone's attention, you don't really believe that do you?
that's so stupid.
did that work?