Remote viewers: have you seen past 2012?, page 12
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 73 times


reply posted on 26-10-2009 @ 01:50 PM by akkad
reply to post by libertytoall


The horrors of Hilary Clinton's face are on a par with death, disaster and destruction.

I LOL'd.



reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 04:16 AM by RedCairo
Y'all might like the recent TKR Remote Viewing task which was:

Describe the individual who is the 'official' top political leader of the USA as of May 11, 2013.

Seeing session details require login (it's free/nospam/noads/etc. - I coded that site so I know, it's innocent)
www.dojopsi.com...

A brief new forum thread about it is here (no login required to read):
www.dojopsi.info...

On the bright side I thought you guys might want to see that sessions on targets post-2012 are just another session.

On the down side, I arbitrarily picked a date to attach to that target, and the session data is a little bizarre, I admit. Maybe adding the date pulled in some related future event. Or not. You never know.

For those who don't know, the only info people get when viewing in a proper science protocol is a random number. They have no idea what the target is. You can see list of all past targets of these 'weekly missions' on the page linked above for an example of the various options (about 6-8 people take turns tasking those).

Just thought that might make it something interesting for ATS folks too.

Best,
PJ


[edit on 27-10-2009 by RedCairo]


reply posted on 27-10-2009 @ 08:53 AM by Silicis n Volvo
reply to post by homoerectus


totally agree...not just nostradamus...but many other prophets have predicted events dating well further on than 2012...which renders this thread null and void


reply posted on 28-10-2009 @ 08:25 AM by Blackjack76
Originally posted by nepafogo
reply to post by SaturnFX


Firt of all you cannot compare the Y2K conspiracy to the 2012 conspiracy. The Y2K conspiracy was based on our own technology and the whole resetting the date back to 1900 in our computer systems. How that was supposed to "end the world" I have no idea and I personally thought it was such bull. I work in the IT industry and was on call in NZ for the rollover and as I suspected absolutely nothing happened other than alot of technology companies made a ton of cash.

2012 is a date based on not only Mayan prophecies, but also the I-Ching prdictions, Hopie Indian prophecies, Sumerian prophesies, Nostradamus just to name a few. Also should mention the galactic allignment and pole shift theories. So to compare this to Y2K is absolutely absurd.

You need to look further than just the Mayan prediction. Just look at the state of the world right now and tell me it doesnt look bleek. The entire middle east is ready to implode into a major war and most likely will be devastating. Financial meltdown worldwide. Extreme weather (major earthquakes, tsunam's, typhoons, hurricanes etc etc). Swine flu and vaccination propoganda. Civil unrest in the USA ( i suspect a civil war is not that far off).

Maybe if you only watched the discovery or history channels documentaries on 2012 I could understand the skeptisism, but once you start connecting the dots it is alot bigger than just the Mayan calendar. I am still not fully convinced on the Mayan Calendar for the reasons you suggest, but to compare this to Y2K is ridiculous.


There are no dots to connect. As for the state of the world at the moment, i really don't think it points in anyway a major catastrophe in 2012. You could go back through any era in history and say the same thing. I do believe things looked a whole lot bleaker during WWII, the Great Death and the volcanic eruption at Pompei. We just have instant access to these events these days and the world is a lot smaller place.

I'd safely bet my worldy possessions on nothing happening of a cataclismic nature in 2012. I will be 36 at the end of that year. I may have put on a few pounds in weight and there is a very good chance i will have a small child. All very probable

Without appearing to flame anyone who thinks they can remote view, please go and see the James Randi Foundation and he will give you a million dollars if you can successfully remote view. As far as i know the prize is still unclaimed by any clairvoiant, remote viewer or spoon bender

Anything else surrounding the predictions on 2012 are conjection, speculation and bad/pseudo science


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 03:10 PM by Sunlionspirit
Well I really don't know if somebody did already read and mention this, but some paper from NWT ( Natuurwetenschappen en Techniek ) did some research about 2012 and found there was an error in calculation : endtimes should be in 2208 !!!!!!! in Dutch ........

www.natutech.nl...:_%272012%27_is_pas_over_twee_eeuwen.html

I hope this link works, I have no time to translate but if necessary I can.
Have a better night, some time left !!! Have a good beer also !!



reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 03:13 PM by Sunlionspirit
www.natutech.nl...:_%272012%27_is_pas_over_twee_eeuwen.html

hope this works ...


reply posted on 29-10-2009 @ 03:18 PM by Sunlionspirit
reply to post by Sunlionspirit


www.natutech.nl/00/nt/nl/47/artikel/26050/Balen:_%272012%27_is_pas_over_twee_eeuwen.html


reply posted on 8-12-2009 @ 03:24 PM by HotPie
In MY opinion, remote viewing is demonistic.


reply posted on 11-12-2009 @ 10:18 AM by win 52
reply to post by Rockstrongo37


Just basing things on a cyclical event as recorded in ice core samples, geological records and archiological records which all point towards a world altering event like a pole shift, tectonic plate shift and other possible changes. These changes seem to happen every so often, here on earth.

Now, what type of cyclical event could do something like that?

How about a visit from our binary solar systems, absent dead sun?

The parting of the Red Sea was one time.

The biblical flood was another pass.

The extinction of the dinosaurs was another pass by.

These fit allong with the 3,600 year interval of a cyclical event.

Things seem to be alligning for another pass by.


reply posted on 12-8-2010 @ 11:14 PM by stereologist
reply to post by win 52


1. rapid pole shifts have never happened - not once
2. there is no 3600 year cycle
3. there is no evidence for a global inundation
4. tectonics plates are constantly in motion
Pages: <<  9    10    11    12    13  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 11 days ago with 35 member flags
Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 3 days ago with 34 member flags
Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 18 days ago with 33 member flags
Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
Tell me to stop
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 8 days ago with 10 member flags