Motorist could be charged for puddle splashing, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 12:07 PM by Miraj
reply to post by loam



No, I wouldn't. But I also wouldn't be there to stop them.

Lots of people did stupid stuff as kids.

They were having fun, there's no need to get so worked up.


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 03:44 AM by stumason
reply to post by noonebutme



These aren't "new rules", these are rules of the road that have been in palce for years. Anyone who has done a driving test should know this, as it is in the Highway Code.

I was splashed last year while on the way back from a Fireworks display on a cold, wet Novemeber 5th. I was with my partner and two small kiddies and we got inundated by a huge wave, soaking us all, by a gang of yobs jeering at us in some BMW. My kids were crying and we were litterally freezing by the time we got home. I was far from a happy bunny.

Aside from the inconvenience of being soaked, it is dangerous. As has been highlighted, losing traction on one wheel can cause a crash, but you can hydroplane if two wheels go through the puddle and you are front or rear-wheel drive.

As for the comment about "what if they swerved to avoid the puddle or crossed a sold white line", well, if they were paying attention to the road and obeying speed limits, then they wouldn't have to "swerve" in the first place. Just slow down as you go through.

Glad they are actually prosecuting people for this as it's happened to me many times.


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 03:50 AM by noonebutme
reply to post by stumason



Still, I watched the video and laughed. Slapstick comedy and all.

It *was* funny. Thankfully, I've not been splashed like that. On wet days or when I'm walking on the pavement I keep an eye on that sort of thing.


[edit on 15-10-2009 by noonebutme]


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 04:28 AM by OzWeatherman
reply to post by willow1d



Yeah he deliberately drove into a puddle, while its slightly amusing, imagine how unamusing it wouldve been if he had aquaplaned straight into the group of kids...

Certainly an immature act by a supposed adult


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 04:58 AM by stumason
reply to post by noonebutme



Well, we can't all be as vigilant and aware as you obviously are, especially if dealing with small children. Even when I have noticed a huge puddle, often there is no alternative other than taking a huge risk that some arse-head won't drench you for "giggles".


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 11:28 AM by Jplem
reply to post by whatukno



I saw this video on break.com the other day, this was hilarious. If i were him I'd make it a ritual and every time it rained I'd get em again, til i was locked up or their mom got me


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 11:35 AM by stumason
reply to post by 3vilscript



Enraging isn't the word for it. When I was got last November (as stated above) with the kids, by the time we got them home, they were white, cold and shaking. I had to put on 3 convector heaters to blast them and strip them naked as soon as we got in to try and warm the little buggers up.

Had we not been so close to home, then they may well have gone into hypothermic shock, it was that cold.

I could have killed the idiots who did that to me and the kids, they're just lucky the traffic lights ahead were green as they went through.


reply posted on 15-10-2009 @ 12:02 PM by Merriman Weir
Originally posted by noonebutme
reply to
post by stumason


On wet days or when I'm walking on the pavement I keep an eye on that sort of thing

[edit on 15-10-2009 by noonebutme]


Yeah that's great and all but do you think the rest of us live in Blindsville or something? That we all walk around with our eyes closed? What about when you can see it coming and there's nothing you can do about it? When there's nowhere to go on pavements, or stretches of road where there can be puddles lining the street for 10, 15, 20 yards? What do you do then?


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 12:09 PM by Miraj
reply to post by loam



Can't blame them for being young at heart.

I watched the video, was pretty funny


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 12:42 PM by Nutter
reply to post by Tiloke



There was no "what-if". Driving at a high rate of speed through a puddle is considered by law to be "driving recklessly". The driver drove through the puddle at a high rate of speed, therefore was charged with "reckless driving". I don't see how that is considered a "what-if"? Unless you consider the whole "reckless driving" law a "what-if".



[edit on 16-10-2009 by Nutter]


reply posted on 16-10-2009 @ 12:44 PM by stumason
reply to post by Tiloke



Don't be so daft. It is not only very dangerous, but also very unpleasant for those on the receiving end. And yes, you can be prosecuted for doing something dangerous because of what might happen. Is it not better to try and prevent things from happening, rather than "reacting" later on?

Or are you advocating letting people do what they want, regardless of the impact on others? By your logic, people should be allowed to drive at 150MPH through residential streets. After all, people only might get killed.

This has been illegal for decades, it's in the highway code and every driver should know this.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Alaska: Samantha Koenig Kidnapped last week.
  Posted 4 days ago with 111 member flags
Blue Spheres Fall from the Sky in the UK
  Posted 17 days ago with 81 member flags
The Chinese have seen the dragon in the sky !!
  Posted 4 days ago with 70 member flags
Strange Sounds in Sky Explained by Scientists
  Posted 13 days ago with 60 member flags
She Dialed 911. The Cop Who Came to Help Raped Her.
  Posted 6 days ago with 49 member flags
Anonymous: Revealing The Arcane Legal Trick Behind ACTA
  Posted 13 days ago with 42 member flags
Anonymous reveals Haditha massacre emails | RT
  Posted 9 days ago with 33 member flags