Originally posted by crichton13
That ANY form of REAL EFFECTIVE time travel has not, is not and as YET IN THE FUTURE, NOT BEEN discovered and mad EFFECTIVE for ANY type of mammalian
specise to use, survive and, indeed, utilise.
One can SEE linear, uninturrupted time being demonstrated when one views websites like utube or nothingtoxic.
One can SEE uninturrupted linear time being played out IN THE OPEN, when we watch the television and/or view an online video clip.
Humans live in the now.
If things WERE happening that would/could/SHOULD be altered then our limited perceptions of linera time would be so SEVERELY affected that the whole
PLANET would be in turmoil.
There were numerous cases where it was documented that people seem to have traveled vast distances in a blink of an eye. A spanish guy finishing his
guard duty got dizzy and found himself on the other side of the Atlantic at one of their colonies before 4 or 5 centuries. Another guy was flying its
plane across the Bermudas and found himself covering the same distance in 30 mins instead of 45 or more, following the same route, spending less time
and less fuel, after entering a storm.
These might be cases that for scientific research are hard to be reproduced or even accepted but they were documented. If its not lies then there is
the simple possibility that the mechanics of nature itself have embedded in them the function of time travel. WE humans don't know what time and
matter is. Nature does know. This should not change the possibility that time travel might be occur naturally everywhere as we speak and it some times
is just manifesting in larger sequences drawing in unsuspected individuals by a mere coincidence, just like bonds between atoms exist but this force
does not, whatever is responsible for it, is not manifesting in a grander scale to affect our every day events and be noticed by our perception. Or is
Let's face it we don't know *.
We are making assumptions upon assumptions, no wonder why LHC is failing, if the science behind it is based upon some elect few theories (that usually
serve an agenda) to be the only ground work on which the procedure of research and the interpretation of the outcome will be applied.
Science could start applying research for things that might literally be under its nose for once. If it gets to upset the current PTB, then so be it.
Can nature help itself to change its function and behavior in the ways we wish it would be beneficial for us in order to help our current social
structure and order to be sustained?
I think not.
Nature works in certain ways and we either accept it and follow it and see results or make paths around it and get stuck in endless circles.
Originally posted by OmegaLogos
The Higgs boson, if it exists, MUST be mediating these low temp and pressure etc interactions or we wouldn't be here!
So in fewer words Higgs boson or the general idea behind it (which might be after something very similar if not Higgs boson itself) is prevalent in
nature, we just haven't look at the right places or with the right kind of attitude in order to discover this yet hidden "natural" element or
I was always wondering what kind of particle would be able to generate or be the carrier of the effects of thought and feelings as perceived by our
senses and even be the primary element in the concept of intelligence as we understand it, in our reality.
[edit on 16-10-2009 by spacebot]
Oh and excuse me for the late addition.
Did you know that at a plain social encounter, a female brain is able to formulate 30 different opinions based on interpreting visual results, in less
than 30 seconds when the attention is focused on an unknown male that happens to enter the immediate vicinity?
There might be even faster functions in the brain itself from this particular one. It would be logical they might exist.
Why should we need all that superfast mechanism in order for the simplest brain tasks to be produced? maybe at faster levels of data processing inside
our brains there might even exist manipulation of time and space present as a natural constant for the mechanics of this function to work?
We often seem we call it "subconscious" for a lack of a better understanding of the mechanics of thought.
We don't understand why we do have superfast brains as species, yet we do understand why we do have a subconscious mechanism functioning hidden
somewhere in there. Either it been directed from our own DNA itself that takes control of our 3 part brains (reptilian/mammal/human) at instances or
its an overall mechanism concerning all parts of our human physiology.
[edit on 16-10-2009 by spacebot]