Food production "must rise 70%" , page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 13-10-2009 @ 03:36 PM by silent thunder
Can we almost double food production in less than half a century? It seems a stretch to me.

The article below mentions "climate change," but there are other serious obstacles to boosting production to this level. First of all, most land needs fertiliziers to even grow any food, and most fertilizers are petroleum-based. After some years of such treatment, even "high-quality" arable land like that in the US midwest or Ukraine becomes "addictied" to it, the natural soil minerals are leeched out, and you are left with what one farmer described as a "sandy dirt sponge" that must constantly be soaked with petro-fertilizers. How will this extra demand for petroleum impact a global oil market many say has already peaked or is dangerously stretched?

Then there is the issue of irrigation and water rights...already contentious. Lots of people are squabbling over the rights to rivers and other freshwater sources that are dwindling. A doubling of production might lead to real "water wars."

Finally there is the fact that as nations develop (China, India, etc.) their people tend to eat better. Nothing wrong with that in principle, but if you want to feed beef or pork every day to another few billion people, its going to take a lot more grain than current levels because cows and pigs eat it themselves, you know, and growing livestock means a need for more plant growth than would be necessary to feed humans directly with grains, etc.

In the 20th century, the so-called "Green Revolutuion" helped lift billions out of poverty to a better life. But like all things, it took with one hand even as it gave. It boosted petroleum use, increased populations in areas that are not able to sustain them over the long term, and increased freshwater use (to the point that many of the world's great rivers no longer reach the sea). Will we have another "green revolution" through genetically modified crops, etc? And what kinds of problems would that bring?

Nasty business, if you ask me.



Food production "must rise 70%"

Food production will have to increase by 70% over the next 40 years to feed the world's growing population, the United Nations food agency predicts.

The Food and Agricultural Organisation says if more land is not used for food production now, 370 million people could be facing famine by 2050.

The world population is expected to increase from the current 6.7 billion to 9.1 billion by mid-century.



More at source
news.bbc.co.uk...



[edit on 10/13/09 by silent thunder]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 8 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 4 days ago with 133 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 5 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 9 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 6 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 12 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 17 days ago with 73 member flags