It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by oliveoil
I'll be back after lunch.
Originally posted by oliveoil
Its a known fact that the manuscript that dates most closely to the original autograph is p 52. It was copied around 125 AD. within 35 years of the original.
Can we at least agree on this.?
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
Hey Olive are you a "Kitchen Christian" no church services for you?
Originally posted by oliveoil
It doesnt really matter how old the original manuscripts are as long as they remain close to the original Autographs.The original manuscripts that contain the Comma remain consistante with the original Autographs.
Originally posted by oliveoil
I observe the Sabbath.
Originally posted by oliveoil
reply to post by miriam0566
Miriam,
Please do me a favor and do some research on a little old man named Father Tertullian who lived from 160 to 220 AD.
Originally posted by oliveoil
I guess it all boils down to 2 choices
Westcott & Hort or the Textus Receptus as far as translation goes.
But interpretation of these is what counts. Thats why I choose the later.
Originally posted by oliveoil[Please do me a favor and do some research on a little old man named Father Tertullian who lived from 160 to 220 AD.
He Wrote treatises on theology. In his work He quotes the Comma From the bible he gave sermons from. Well documented.
By the benediction we have the same mediators
of faith as we have sureties of salvation. That number of the
divine names of itself suffices for the confidence of our hope.
Yet because it is under the charge of three that profession of faith
and promise of salvation are in pledge, there is a necessary addi-
tion, the mention of the Church: because where there are the
three, the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, there is the
Church, which is a body of three.
Originally posted by oliveoil
I guess it all boils down to 2 choices
Westcott & Hort or the Textus Receptus as far as translation goes.
But interpretation of these is what counts. Thats why I choose the later.