Originally posted by Magantice
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by Magantice
Don't you think your concept of soul could just simply be a belief? A comfort for you in troubled times? I understand what people talk about when
they say look at the space between things, or your thoughts. I liken it to processing from a different area of the brain. Nothing more. I used to have
beliefs in a soul, life after death, but my rational mind went insane trying to prove or disprove this. In the end, I decided it was best not to think
of such things. To say, "I don't know" seemed much more appropriate than any belief.
Well sir, I'm glad you are open to more discussion because you are correct when you suggest that my concept of soul is simply my belief.
So you say that because you nearly went insane trying to prove or disprove the soul and life after death etc, you found it was easier to just dismiss
the idea of a soul and spirituality. Its my concept of what is real to me.
I have not been able to capture a fart and paint it red but I know for a fact when one is around. As Im sure you do as well.
Yes. No need to capture it or paint it red. It makes itself known by sound, smell.
We have other senses we do not use. I would love to be able to do controlled remote viewing. I cannot however prove that this ability even exists.
This too is just a belief.
I'm not convinced we have other senses. As far as I can tell, all else is subconscious processes. I don't think it has anything to do with
sensation, just parallel processing going on that we tap into to some extent. I think of intuition as an integral between instinct, & memory.
If you had ever seen an angel or actually been involved in a miracle, no one would have to convince you of anything. If you had ever actually had your
body overwhelmed by the power of the holy spirit, no one could convince you that your soul does not exist or that a creator does not exist.
I have had a few "supernatural" occurrences. At the time it seemed miraculous, but have sense analyzed the experience and found reasoning for them
all. I think miracles fall into two categories. Intentionally fooling someone or another, like the case of Sai Baba & such, or simply not having an
immediate answer for an experience. I do think people experience angels and many other things. I think this is abnormal functioning going on in the
brain. It's curious to note, many times people have such experiences is when under extreme duress.
I think some people short-circuit their normal neural processes, and as a coping mechanism the mind produces an experience to get by. Perhaps some
people's mind cope by dreaming on top of reality. I think it's all in the mind. Nobody's really out there (angels).
I have had an extended period where I was convinced that I was guided by spirit. After my brother died my family needed me. Many things changed in
myself. Now looking back, I was psychotic. That's all. The pain caused me to change personalities, brain-wave state, etc..
I'm quite sure that there are people who believe that Stephen Hawking, Nickoli Tesla, Albert Einstein and others are complete idiots due to their
theorys that cannot be proven at this time to all people.
I'm sure there are many. I've heard that Hawking may be wrong on many things. Nobody gets it all correct. Same with Einstein, and to a lesser extent
Tesla as well. I'm in coplete agreement that some things need time to be accepted and proven by other people. How long has the concept of
spirituality been around? No proof yet. Not a shred of evidence.
Stating that people who are spiritual are complete psychos is irresponsible on your part because this is something you yourself CANNOT prove.
That's not the reason I think they are psychos. I have simply found a high degree of psychos to be interested in teaching spirituality.
People who live in the amazon rain forrest have to concept or belief in snow for example, that does not mean snow doesn't exist. They cannot fathom
anything they have never experienced.
True. I am fascinated by the story of the Native Americans who couldn't see the Europeans ships at first, because they had no concept of it. No
previous experience. Difference here is, I have had what I thought at the time was spiritual experiences.
Why do you need solid proof of anything???? Don't you believe that the posibility exists that you don't know everything? If you have ever loved
anyone in your life then you must admit you have a soul. The creator is real in the universe. Once you leave this life here on terra and escape the
illusion of reality, you will know for yourself things you cannot concieve of at this time. You probably are confused by the God of the Bible. Most of
us are at some point. Do not assume the God spoken of in the bible is the prime creator. The God of the bible is vengeful and possessive as described
by man in this written account of " The word".
I don't only think it possible, it's certain that I don't know everything. That's why I state, the best I can say is I don't know. I see your
second statement as absurd, sorry. To love is to experience the soul? Isn't love instinctual?
The illusion of reality...hmm...
I'm not confused by the God of the bible. I long ago put that book aside and concluded that it was hogwash. I do find it important to note that
people's concept of God is dependent on the given culture of the surrounding people. That it is both dependent on the era, and the region. God is a
blanket term for the unknown. We are curious creatures. What we don't know, we still must put a label on or else most will go crazy. This label for
most is God. My label is as it is, I do not (yet?) know.
You cannot prove to anyone what wind is in detail but you know when you feel it and when you are in it. Do you call upon the wind when you cannot cope
with reality???? No you do not. Its just there or not there at any given time. The prime creator just IS and requires no proof.
It offends me personally that you feel such distain for people who KNOW something that you do not. Remember that what cannot be proven today
may be proveable tommorrow. Once there was no proof that the earth was round as opposed to flat.
Yeah, I don't think they know anything of this. They believe. If they've truly convinced their selves that they know something unknowable, they are
psychotic. Who was it that said, "To know the face of god is madness"?? I take this as we can't know what is incomprehensible to us. Remember, God
is just a blanket term for the unknown. To know the unknown is absurd.
Because I genuinely care about all humanity including you, I would ask you to reserve all judgement about things you have no proof of. The resentment
it makes you feel just isnt healthy for you. I wish you peace of mind until the day you have your proof.
I have done this in a way, by concluding that we just can't know. In another way I am judging by saying those who know must be psychotic. I don't
look down on psychotics. I've been psychotic. I do not like when psychotics try to teach other people, though. Group psychosis is bad juju. I think
we can both think of examples on this.
I think it's apparent by now, I'm not (nor has anyone really ever) going to find proof. I think the notion is insane in itself. If someone wants to
believe, fine. To equate that belief with knowledge though...that is very dangerous.
dont take off points for spelling or punctuation.......Im not the brightest bulb in the pack.
Not at all. Thanks for taking the time to give your take on this. I appreciate it. Take care.