reply to post by ashnomadonte
So basically you list some cases and this is to assume this will happen to every individual? I dont think any patriotic serving soldiers who happen to
be gay are going to be opposed due to afew cases.
If there are homosexuals who wish to serve without risk of being harrassed,
Im pritty sure they can make the decision themselves as to what to
identify as. However there are gays out there who dont quiet frankly give a damn about what the bigots think,
they have the right as the
founding fathers gave to them to identify themselves.
You people are just unbelievable. You reference afew cases, another member stereotypes all gays as supposed "sexual addicts", its because of your
blind views, your stereotypical views that you think this law should be place. This policy really is anti-homosexual.
It's certainly something seeing a spike in soldiers being kicked out of the army though. Just say your homosexual and that trip to boot camp will be
no more. Another example of how this policy is just doing wonders for the military.
The spokesperson, Kim Waldron, a civilian who works for the U.S. Army Forces Command at Fort McPherson, Ga., said the active duty deployment of
Reservists and National Guard troops who say they are gay, or who are accused of being gay, takes place under a Forces Command or “FORSCOM”
regulation issued in 1999.
Waldron said the regulation is aimed at preventing Reservists and National Guard members from using their sexual orientation — or from pretending to
be gay — to escape combat.
“The bottom line is some people are using sexual orientation to avoid deployment,” Waldron said. “So in this case, with the Reserve and Guard
forces, if a soldier ‘tells,’ they still have to go to war and the homosexual issue is postponed until they return to the U.S. and the unit is
demobilized.”
www.washblade.com...
This aint just about identity, this is also about the impact on the military, and how many are having to come to terms with the reality of the
situation.
SG