reply to post by I_AM_OVERLORD1
'Numbers beyond Yottabytes haven't yet been named.' Who's in Big Brother's Database? By James Bamford --Review of The Secret Sentry: The
Untold History of the National Security Agency by Matthew M. Aid 05 Nov 2009 Lacking adequate space and power at its city-sized Fort Meade, Maryland,
headquarters, the NSA is also completing work on another data archive, this one in San Antonio, Texas, which will be nearly the size of the Alamodome.
Just how much information will be stored in these windowless cybertemples? A clue comes from a recent report prepared by the MITRE Corporation, a
Pentagon think tank. ..."[T]he data volumes are increasing with a projection that sensor data volume could potentially increase to the level of
Yottabytes (1024 Bytes) by 2015." Roughly equal to about a septillion (1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000) pages of text, numbers beyond Yottabytes
haven't yet been named. Once vacuumed up and stored in these near-infinite "libraries," the data are then analyzed by powerful infoweapons,
supercomputers running complex algorithmic programs, to determine who among us may be--or may one day become--a terrorist.
www.nybooks.com...
i found this article viewing www.legitgov.org...
gosh, do you think i might be on that list? this really isn't funny one bit. as far as knowing what software program they will use? don't know.
|
you mean they will store this for future ref.
well for the record i have never been a terrorist.
i will never become a terrorist.
and thirdly i think the term !!government intelligence!! is an oxymoron.
w@nkers
|
FBI, NSA, CIA, etc.. etc.. can all eat a big weenie.
For the record, I object to my tax dollars being used for any aspect of internet data mining, personal information storage, or any related activities
for the purpose of law enforcement. Especially if private corporations/companies are profiting from said activities.
No doubt these data collection/processing facilities cost millions if not billions of dollars.
We do not have enough jails/prisons. Neither can we afford to staff such facilities even if we could find competent people in the numbers necessary.
We can not possibly prosecute all of the criminals. Therefore it is obvious to me that technology will be used to target certain people. People who
are "enemies of the state", threats to corporations, or simply ended up on some connected person's # list.
I know a lot of people. But I'm not aware of a single person who does not commit "crime" on regular basis, whether knowingly or not. Take any
person of your choosing, follow them everywhere, listen to their conversations, read their correspondence. Within a week you'll likely have enough
evidence to at least levy heavy fines, if not several felony convictions.
Words on the internet are still just words, a.k.a. "speech" which is still a Constitutionally protected right in these United States, as far as I
know.
As long as my speech does not infringe upon your liberties and vice versa, then government can kiss my internet posting, American ass.
Prosecute physical acts of crime (there's plenty of it), and stop the witch hunting.
|
Wireshark
Perl
Regexp
The act of monitoring the internet is not really that hard, give me a core router at say Verizon which is capable of port forwarding and with the
above tools I can probably pull some semi-coherent data off the line. Its making sense of what is caught that really is the trick. Chances are they
use something much like Wireshark to capture incoming traffic, then hand it off to some other piece of software which actually sifts through it for
whatever criteria they pick.
|
If the F.B.I. wants to monitor me, go ahead. I personally let them to do that. Unlike C.I.A., N.S.A. and other government organizations the Federal
Bureau of Investigation is the only normal government organization which is still doing something against corruption, against criminals and against
crime as we saw numerous times. They're not taking sides, regardless what some people whose INTERESTS are hurt by them are telling you. They're not
a puppet organization as the other upper ones. If it's necessary they're turning against the TPTB as they did many times. Although if you don't
have anything to hide, you don't have to fear from the F.B.I. at all. If the thread would be about the N.S.A. or the C.I.A., yes I would agree with
the others, fear them. But the F.B.I. is not similar and they're not using their power against the people, but they're using it against the
criminals. Personally I also believe they're rather on the side of the conspirators, on the side on the people then on the side of the NWO. Their
actions used to prove this. As they're the only organization which is capable to show RESULTS, I rather support them as they also never let me
down.
P.S.: This thread gave me the idea for my new signature. 
[edit on 13-10-2009 by Sharrow]
|
Cool tool ...
trace.die.net...
Also found this about a week ago... I don't know if Sophos is high profile but I recall Sophos being an AV company? Not sure if it's the same Sophos
and don't care... but to add to your investigation...
I just found this to be somewhat alarming (if it is the same Sophos AV co. to jump into, through a buy out) a ISP level LIMS. Anyone with a background
in CS and AV programming techniques should be able to do math here.
Link
[edit on 10·13·09 by DrMattMaddix]
|
I wish the government would make more of an effort toward curing the causes of crime rather than spend so many resources on prosecuting criminals.
Lawmaking does not eliminate crime, it only propagates it.
Perhaps off topic, but whatever.
|
I do get the feeling it isnot just the FBI that is doing this, there is private companies over here in the UK, who are working with British Security
services, to monitor peoples, internet business, phone calls, mobile calls etc.
It is more Global than people think.
They do not care if this infringes our own privacy..
|
