CIA Intel Analyst Who Briefed President: Iran Threat All Hype, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 02:20 AM by nenothtu
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
But Rome did not win.

Scorched earth policy (and retreat) only works against a rapidly invading army with a long supply route, and only as a very last resort.

The Russians did this during WW2, and lured the German army into a killer winter. The Chinese have been doing it for thousands of years against invaders.
.
It is a worst possible strategy for civil war or revolution.
Once you have trashed your own nation, where are you going to go ?


Rome didn't win? Are we talking about the same thing? The Gallic Wars of Caesar, 55 - 51 BC? Vercingetorix, Alesia, all that?

Rome didn't win? What the devil were they doing controlling the area for the next several centuries without opposition, then? How do you define a win, if that's not it? They seem to have accomplished their objective, even captured and executed Vercingetorix when he failed to stick by his plan.

I agree that Scorched Earth is a last resort, but disagree that it's ONLY use is against rapid invaders with long supply lines. Making an area absolutely unliveable will effectively deny it to ANY opponent. Even natives of the area.

Before mine goes to an opponent, such will happen, without doubt. Where am I going to go? You seem to have the notion that I plan on surviving it, and thus would NEED somewhere to go. That wouldn't be the case.

Ergo, the certainty that it is a LAST RESORT.

You see, if I have to fight, I do it like I mean it. I fight to win, not for sport. Suicide bombers have nothing on people like me. We won't throw our lives away for some petty statement, for a "maybe", with non-combatants as the primary targets in a useless gesture. If we're gonna die anyway, a whole lot of the opposition will accompany us, and whatever opposition remains won't gain anything from it, and neither will their progeny.

THEY, the alleged "victors", will be the ones turned into refugees, seeking a new home.


[edit on 2009/11/1 by nenothtu]


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 02:38 PM by dooper
reply to post by Silver Shadow


Sorry for the delay in responding, Silvershadow.

You have a mistaken assumption about weapons and peace. Ever live in a society where every man is armed to the teeth 24/7?

I can assure you, it's one very polite society.

This business about Americans killing each other. Not going to happen like you seem to think.

If some event topples control, you'll see the small percentage of the population that wants to help themselves to the property of others meeting some rather stiff resistance. Their numbers will steadily decline as summary justice once again takes precedent.

It's most efficient. In fact, if our laws would enable such a thing, all this violence we experience would be rapidly quashed. Repeat offenders?

Not when addressed promptly the first time around.

The law has gone from protecting the innocent to a means of providing refuge for the lawless.

We'll take care of that too, but since we'll be catching up from decades of decline, it will not be accomplished overnight.


reply posted on 1-11-2009 @ 06:43 PM by dooper
reply to post by Silver Shadow



You misunderstand America.

Yes, if an attempt - and I specify attempt - is made to declare martial law - the question becomes, "where?"

Because there's no way in Hades to do so nationwide. We don't have enough military, police, sheriffs, and other law enforcement that would be required to even shut down one major city.

It will be neighbors banding together to bring order to their neighborhoods and keep roving bands of predators out.

It won't be like Katrina. Katrina was localized. Our problem will be Katrina times a thousand at once. No one will be moving into any area and coming to the rescue.

It's going to be about self-preservation. Neighborhood by neighborhood, section by section, community after community, and then order will eventually be reestablished by States.

Which at that point will never again relinquish power to a strong central government.

We get to start from scratch, and learn that the original Constitution as written was ideal.

Large governments don't work. A state is as big a government as anyone needs.

The rest is just to coordinate mutual projects and national defense.

It will be bad, it will be bloody, and it will be over before you know it.

We're independent, but once we have a task to perform, we get right down to it.


reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 12:06 AM by Chevalerous
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by Silver Shadow
Plan for Global leadership ?

There you go, not plan to get along with other nations peacefully, but LEADERSHIP, presumably by force.

I wish you luck in leading the world after you have had your revolution.

America will be lucky to survive at all as a nation once the shooting starts.





[edit on 1/11/2009 by Silver Shadow]


See above post, and I'd like to add why should we lead the rest of the world? Something wrong with your own leaders? Seems to me, and I'm not alone, that you folks ought to be able to lead yourselves.



Yes! but here is the problem my friend!

We actually WANT America to lead the world, but in a very responsable way witout things like the PNAC agenda and insanity!

We have trusted you enough to let you administer our world reserve currency, (which by the way made it possible for you of propping up your way of living with the Petro-Dollar system and hegemony, and look what happened to that?

The world economy is screwed because of Wall Streets greed!

And now you guys have invented a new beautiful scheme of speculating in Life Insurances - when will the insanity end?

Well buddy!

You and people like Dooper nead to get into the politics, that's for sure!

We need a new start in some way!

Like I wrote in another thread! O'boy I miss the DD "IKE" Eisenhower days!



[edit on 2-11-2009 by Chevalerous]



reply posted on 2-11-2009 @ 05:19 AM by nenothtu
Originally posted by Chevalerous

Yes! but here is the problem my friend!

We actually WANT America to lead the world, but in a very responsable way witout things like the PNAC agenda and insanity!


I have reluctantly led people off and on through life, and I can assure you that I NEVER let those led determine how I should lead. If they have a better plan, then THEY need to lead. If not, then let me lead as I see fit. If some one wants me to lead, and then TELLS me how to do it, how they want to be led, in short order they will be searching for another leader.

That concept is the same for countries as it is for individuals. If someone else has a better idea, then they don't need the US to lead, they should step up and take the lead themselves.

Personally, I'm hoping the US gets out of the world leadership business soon. We have other things that need to be attended to.


We have trusted you enough to let you administer our world reserve currency, (which by the way made it possible for you of propping up your way of living with the Petro-Dollar system and hegemony, and look what happened to that?


Beats me what happened to it. My suggestion is for you all to administer your own money. God knows the US monetary system is messed up, what with allowing a private company to churn out paper money backed by pretty much nothing.


The world economy is screwed because of Wall Streets greed!


Nope. The world economy is screwed up because the trusted known crooks to guard the henhouse, i.e. Wall Street, instead of looking after their own interests.

The US economy is screwed up because too many folks trusted the government NOT to do boneheaded thing with our money, like uh... give it to Wall Street. We KNOW Wall Street is run by crooks. I can't for the life of me understand why Washington gave them MORE money to line their pockets with. MY money. Maybe DC didn't get the memo about Wall Street being run by crooks?


And now you guys have invented a new beautiful scheme of speculating in Life Insurances - when will the insanity end?


All insurance is a scam, not just life insurance, but health insurance too. I wasn't aware that Americans invented it, though. I reckon I learn something every day.

Now our government wants to take the insurance racket over, too, with their "single payer" or "public option" or whatever that mess is they're trying to ram down our throats, and trying to pass off as "health care". I'd be OK with that, except that the government here intends to FORCE the citizenry to participate, whether they like it or not. I can see that not working out to well for some of us.

I have no insurance, and don't want any. It's nothing more than a racket to part fools from their money. I carried insurance for years, and couldn't use it when I needed it. It's a racket, and they got enough money out of me for nothing. Now the government steps in, and is saying I HAVE to have insurance, under penalty of law? Nope. Come and get me. I ain't paying a DAMN thing into it.


Well buddy!

You and people like Dooper nead to get into the politics, that's for sure!

We need a new start in some way!

Like I wrote in another thread! O'boy I miss the DD "IKE" Eisenhower days!



Me and Dooper go into politics? And to think someone said Europeans have a strange sense of humor! I don't find that strange at all, it's PERFECTLY humorous!

No, I pretty sure NO ONE want us to go into politics. Least of all me!

I think I'm too honest to make a good politician anyhow...



[edit on 2009/11/2 by nenothtu]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Truth, Lies, Oil and Scotland
  Posted 19 days ago with 8 member flags
Russian cops mistake nationalist rally for gay pride parade
  Posted 18 days ago with 4 member flags
Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 10 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 1 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 14 days ago with 1 member flags