But arent't there little office kitchens with things that can explode, and fire extinguishers, and stuff like that which would blow up in the area of the fires..?

And generators..?

I can hear what you are referring to here. Very loud, muffled explosions.

I was also intrigued by the "related video" that came up at the bottom called 'WTC demolition sequence revealed". Those look like some sort of charges going off.

I, myself, have heard theories about the old gas lines going through the center of the buildings possibly having been used as an avenue for the placement of demolition charges.

Thanks for the informative post.

Originally posted by OmegaPoint
But arent't there little office kitchens with things that can explode, and fire extinguishers, and stuff like that which would blow up in the area of the fires..?

That's what "they" claim. But I am specifically referring to the deeper, more muffled sounding explosions. An underground explosion would sound just like those, as the real low frequency portion of the signal would get through, while the higher frequencies would get attenuated much much more. Anyone into audio real deep that has knowledge of sound proofing could tell you that. And seeing as I would be such a person, I am telling you that.

Originally posted by OmegaPoint
But arent't there little office kitchens with things that can explode, and fire extinguishers, and stuff like that which would blow up in the area of the fires..?

That would be a negative. The building code prohibited explosive devices as such. Meaning you couldn't have tanks of butane to cook with or other similar object. The fire extinguishers were of the non-explosive variety as well. If you're looking for the extinguisher that would explode in a manner as the airtank used in the movie JAWS, that's been debated and debunked before.

I'm not saying there wasn't anything in the building that couldn't explode, but it was a violation to bring anything of potential explosive harm. Especially after there were some bomb threats and attempts from previous years.

Edited to add - that the explosions (plural) actually sounded like the exact same explosion (singular ) in all clips. It sounded the same in all respects minus the different hearing angles. Meaning the speed of explosion, the resonance time and the fall-off sound were all equal. Have you heard any more of that strength that don't sound the same?

Edit # 2
The Rodriguez story: didn't he say that the explosions were very close to when the actual plane hit? In the clips shown, the time frame is waaaaaaay after the initial hot, there's reporters, firefighters and a slew others. In one clip the reporters mentioned "even hours after"

b


[edit on 12-10-2009 by Bspiracy]

The only problem with this stuff about things in the building exploding, is that, well, the whole buildings EXPLODED! There was no progressive "pancake collapse" that's not what actually occured, and all the official story has to say about it, in the FEMA, NIST and 9/11 Commission Report, is that once initiated, at around the area of impact and fires, what occured thereafter was automatic and inevitable, as seen in the vidoes - but what's seen in the videos, is the buildings being exploded.