It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama will go to trial ?

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 01:31 PM
link   
the youtube member 'originalmetalchic' is reporting today that Obama will have to go to court about his Birth certificate and the MSM is not covering the story.
anyone know if this is true ?









Alex Jones has the video in his favorites so i am thinking he will be talking about this soon on his show ?

www.youtube.com...




posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 01:33 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 

Dont know if its true, I doubt it. But her eyes are freaky......



posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 01:56 PM
link   
reply to post by acmpnsfal
 


It's true, she's almost reading direct from Orly Taitz website.

Yes, Her eyes are freaky... Not sure if they are Betty Davis eyes or Annie Lennox eyes.



posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 02:01 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


The President doesn't go to the same court we do. First it has to go through a hearing of impeachment, then he has to be impeached, then when he is out out do we press any charges for falsifying documents.



posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 02:04 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


I thought this was a done deal. Granted, I did enjoy the thought that the great ego Obama might be humbled and that a great conspiracy would come to fruition.

But they have either proven, or covered it up so well that nothing will come of it.

That is my prediction. But what do I know? I predicted that Palin would be Veep as well. . .




posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 02:08 PM
link   
I would think someone powerful enough to force us into socialism/communism/fascism/corporatism/(insert ism here) could surely pull a few strings and get out of a lawsuit.

If I were the antichrist/maitraya/loch ness monster, there's no way you could get me in court.

These youtube videos really crack me up though. Why the need to get infront of the camera?



posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by acmpnsfal

her eyes are freaky......


a good kind of freaky




reply to post by DrMattMaddix

It's true, she's almost reading direct from Orly Taitz website.


never heard of that site, is it legit ?



reply to post by Just a Grunt

The President doesn't go to the same court we do. First it has to go through a hearing of impeachment, then he has to be impeached, then when he is out out do we press any charges for falsifying documents.


hmm..not sure to be honest. why would he have to be impeached just to go to a trial ? wouldn't a hearing of impeachment come after a trial ?




reply to post by mikerussellus

I thought this was a done deal. Granted, I did enjoy the thought that the great ego Obama might be humbled and that a great conspiracy would come to fruition.

But they have either proven, or covered it up so well that nothing will come of it.

That is my prediction. But what do I know? I predicted that Palin would be Veep as well. . .


yes me too , i thought this was over and done with. i am on the side that believes he should have to show the actual certificate. why not if there is nothing to hide ..right ?

you might be correct with your prediction, we will see




reply to post by yadda333

I would think someone powerful enough to force us into socialism/communism/fascism/corporatism/(insert ism here) could surely pull a few strings and get out of a lawsuit.


yes that is the harsh reality of this isn't it. i am sure the NWO boogyman will get him a free ticket out of this again. we will see.



thanks everyone for the replies








[edit on 12-10-2009 by easynow]



posted on Oct, 12 2009 @ 04:44 PM
link   
Well, if it's on YouTube, it must be true!


Seriously, the pretty girl with the weird eyes is partially right. There is a case, but right now, The Dept of Justice has submitted a motion to dismiss. Judge Carter hasn't yet ruled on the motion to dismiss. So we're waiting to have his judgment on that. If he denies the motion to dismiss the case, then it will move forward, but if he accepts the motion to dismiss, it will be dismissed.

Now, the Internet is abuzz with the statement that Carter has denied the motion to dismiss, but it's nothing more than buzz.

Thread about it here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 12-10-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 01:57 PM
link   
reply to post by DrMattMaddix
 



It's true, she's almost reading direct from Orly Taitz website.


sorry for my ignorance , i now know who this Taitz person is..





@ 2:40 in the video she claims Obama could get a birth certificate from Hawaii even if he wasn't a natural born citizen ?

so even if he produced the full certificate that still wouldn't prove anything ?



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 02:14 PM
link   
The President being a member of the executive branch, is immune to requests from the judicial and legislative branches.

The only incident where this is not the case is under the articles of impeachment written out in the Constitution of the United States.



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 04:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Choronzon
 


so in other words he is above the law ?

i guess seeing the actual full certificate is not going to prove anything anyways but i find it suspicious that he won't show it.



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 04:41 PM
link   
reply to post by easynow
 


That woman is a nut job. She's so filled full of propaganda.

I don't really support this, because it doesn't matter. But finally it can get settled once and for all.

But probably won't.



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 05:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by easynow
@ 2:40 in the video she claims Obama could get a birth certificate from Hawaii even if he wasn't a natural born citizen ?


This is true, but it would state the ACTUAL place of his birth, NOT as Hawaii, but wherever he was born.


I actually did a thread about it here.

[edit on 15-10-2009 by Benevolent Heretic]



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 06:10 PM
link   
reply to post by Miraj
 



But probably won't.


right now i agree with you , and i don't see that changing unless some new type of evidence surfaces.




reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 




This is true, but it would state the ACTUAL place of his birth, NOT as Hawaii, but wherever he was born.

I actually did a thread about it here.



well one can only conclude that he has never revealed it because it doesn't say Hawaii on it ? right ? not many other explanations that i can think of for the no show.

thanks for the link to your thread , i had a look at it and i believe oneclickaway 's post pretty much summed it all up for me.


www.abovetopsecret.com...



only question i have is , would the full certificate name the doctor who delivered the Baby ? anyone ever looked into that ?



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 06:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by easynow
well one can only conclude that he has never revealed it because it doesn't say Hawaii on it ? right ? not many other explanations that i can think of for the no show.


www.abovetopsecret.com...



only question i have is , would the full certificate name the doctor who delivered the Baby ? anyone ever looked into that ?


Yes, it would. The Dr's name is Rodney T West.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

And if you agree with oneclickaway, that says all I need to know.



posted on Oct, 15 2009 @ 07:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
 


oh sure , post the info that i wasn't aware of and then chastise me for agreeing with oneclickaway


interesting that it might be because of the race issue , i hadn't thought of that. thanks for the info



posted on Oct, 16 2009 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by easynow
oh sure , post the info that i wasn't aware of and then chastise me


I didn't mean to chastise you. Sorry.


I'm glad the information was enlightening.



new topics

top topics



 
2

log in

join