David Rockefeller's book 'Memoirs' admits secretly conspiring for a NWO

In David Rockefeller's book 'Memoirs' he admits he is part of a secret cabal working to destroy the United States and create a new world order.Here is the direct quote from his book, pg 405:

Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - One World, if you will.If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

'' The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the bankers and the elite people control the world ''
- Nick Rockefeller [ Aaron Russo interview ]

Bilderberg is strictly "Western" elite, ie American-European. Bilderberg resolutely excludes Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa.

Originally posted by Rigel Kent
reply to post by Getsmart

---

Your not wrong there....

This years attendees were nationals of the following countries:

Originally posted by Getsmart
they have never invited or admitted participants with ethnic origins from Africa, Latin America, Asia or the Middle-East.

Originally posted by dino1989
reply to post by Rigel Kent

---

Who was the Japanese guy/girl?

Originally posted by JoshNorton

Originally posted by Rigel Kent
reply to post by Getsmart

---

This years attendees were nationals of the following countries:

Actually, Getsmart is entirely wrong.
[by JoshNorton on 10/14/2009]

REPLY:

First I must state that having read Josh Norton's many posts defending the purity of vocation of Freemasonry, noted for being despite his vehement protestation a subservient organization to the Illuminati, I wouldn't expect anything else from him other than a rallying call for Elite leaders who have proven for centuries their desire to bring us progress, peace and freedom.

I invite other ATS members to examine our respective posts by looking at our member profiles in order to see our bias about this subject. Descending from a line of 33rd degree masons I have learned and witnessed enough to violently reject that "sect".

He paints it as an ethnic issue rather than a country-based issue. "They have never invited or admitted participants with ethnic origins from Africa, Latin America, Asia or the Middle-East." Saying that would imply that Colin Powell or Condaleezza Rice don't have African ethnic origins, and both have attended previous meetings.[10/14/2009 by JoshNorton]

Interestingly enough, it was because the Bilderberg Group wouldn't include Japan that David Rockefeller started the Trilateral Commission... But again, these are matters of nationality, not race. [JoshNorton on 10/14/2009]

In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it was planned that way.

Franklin D. Roosevelt

And the Bilderberg claims to be a "planning" organization.

You say that Rockefeller liked the Japanese so much (as a nation, not as an ethnic group) that he started a new Power-Elite organization which makes them, along with Europe and the U.S.A. the only ones in the world who matter in making important policy decisions? Isn't this what you claim the Trilateral Commission was set up to accomplish? Doesn't this underline that even with Rockefellers' strategic interests on the table, the Bilderberg still wouldn't allow any Japanese to attend?

So they're definitely not racists at the Bilderberg? And they are only setting out to discriminate against the nationals, not the races, of countries which so happen to belong to certain ethnic groups, and this just because they don't like certain aspects of the identity of a given country?

Are these considered rogue nations? If so, then there are more Bad Countries out there than anyone has been led to believe. Or are they simply countries which fail to fit into the pretty picture of an Elite Utopia on Earth?

Why won't they include them in their discussions of economic policy which mean survival for their commerce and industry? Why keep them out of the loop when it comes to deciding upon wars or peace and military technology, aren't they often nations deeply affected by war? Why not let them participate in determining scientific priorities, especially as these will inevitably impact the health and wellbeing of their populations?

The Bilderberg has organized discrimination and racism behind the disguise as policy groups. Racist and eugenic policies are hidden behind Utopian Think Tank studies couched in pseudo-scientific jargon. Corporate or National or Coalition Interests are used as a pretext to advance the same ideas which brought on WWII.

The Bilderberg Elites are using their economic, military and biological might against the interests of nationals of certain countries. ATS member Josh Norton claims this is due to the identity of the nations involved. Who chooses which nations are the bad ones, and on what criteria? Is it because some countries are worthless contributors to an ideal society?

Are they ugly "we don't like them" countries?

Is this really all about geopolitics or is there an agenda to reduce the eyesore of Third World countries which spoil the plans for paradise on Earth, also known as the Master Plan of the Great Architect which Masons work so hard to achieve?

You can bet the Bilderbergers are looking out for our best interests without so much as a trace of racist behavior. Just like in Volkswagen factories during WWII, where factory workers taken from concentration camps were given varying food rations depending on whether they were Dutch (bigger rations), Polish, Hungarian, Russian, etc. Of course you will insist that this was not a racist policy, certainly no more than those of the Bilderberg.

Did they only do this because the Fuhrer had certain apprehensions about the identity of certain nations? Had it nothing to do with the racial characteristics of their nationals? Was it strictly a field expression of geopolitics, and not in any way or form an oppressive and potentially deadly discrimination?