I don't think there is any "punishment" scenario going on here, this isn't vindictive. The power of the warped American banking system has done a
lot for other nations as well as the US.
The people who make such decisions are interested in money and profit, they have no moral obligations to consider and wouldn't act in a negative way
toward the US in direct risk to their own financial stability or profit.
The reason this is happening is because everyone ignored the inevitable for so long, because the drink was still flowing and the music was still
playing at the massive party we were all having.
No one wanted to consider the clean-up at two in the morning.
Then, someone American guy threw up in the bathroom, party over.
The lights came up and we suddenly saw all the mess.
There is simply no other option than to deal with it. And part of this clean-up is going to be to consider how safe the house is before another party
starts.
People are waking up to just how fragile the $ is because of the party. Right now, it isn't very stable, and any adjustments and potential fixes have
a direct bearing on American financial systems, and then, in turn, our own again. If there is a way to remove the massive risk of the $ collapsing
from affecting other nations, all nations would take it.
I think that's what we're doing now. We're testing the waters to see just what damage would be done TO US by moving away from the $ entirely.
I can see it happening, and I think it should have happened sooner.
But, I'm one of those who truly believes in protectionism. We should be defending our own financial systems, not worrying about a global one.
This is comparable to a war scenario, and in that case we would be defending ourselves first and assisting our allies second. I hope that is what our
elected leaders are doing beneath the surface.