It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Energy Flow Between Dimensions?

page: 3
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 10:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


Only mind can produce imagines of a 'thing' that does not exist. And only a deluded mind would believe it.


An imagination is what produces images of that which does kNot exist and the only thing required for an imagination is Thought, the mind doesn't play a part except to store that Thought.

Your logical order is off but you've proved that repeatedly.

Ribbit




posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 10:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


Now stands alone. Then and when appear in it.


Now exists for a finite moment, Then and When are infinite, so I guess your motto is:

"Safety in Stupidity!"

Ribbit



posted on Oct, 23 2011 @ 10:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by D1ss1dent
reply to post by conspiracy88
 

What Peter Brown says goes Far beyond teleology... and he wrote only One book. You ask itsnowagain to reread books that doesn't yet exist.



If anyone could pull that off, it would be itsnowagain. He lives in Idiocracity.


Ribbit



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 02:51 AM
link   
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


Yes, the truth is not recognized by many.
Normal in this society is not sanity, it is insanity.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 02:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


Yes, the truth is not recognized by many.
Normal in this society is not sanity, it is insanity.


I actually agree with that except I'd drop the normal portion.


Saying something is normal is judgment.


Ribbit

edit on 24-10-2011 by ButtUglyToad because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 02:56 AM
link   
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


Saying that he lives in idiocracity is the judgment.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 03:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


Saying that he lives in idiocracity is the judgment.


Facts are Facts. To say the diamond is the hardest known natural material, is a Fact, kNot judgment.


To say someone is moral and someone isn't moral, that is judgment. I never question your morals, for morals are an illusion.


Ribbit



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 03:04 AM
link   
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


No fact, just judgment. To you 'he lives in idiocracy' is a judgment you have made. It does not make it true.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 03:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 


No fact, just judgment. To you 'he lives in idiocracy' is a judgment you have made. It does not make it true.


You make it true most every Time you open your mouth.


Adios!


Ribbit



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 10:44 AM
link   
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 

Your repeated insults toward many ATS members (here and in many other threads) will not help you at all.

If I were you, I'd be very careful. A ban is imminent.



posted on Oct, 24 2011 @ 10:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by D1ss1dent
reply to post by ButtUglyToad
 

Your repeated insults toward many ATS members (here and in many other threads) will not help you at all.

If I were you, I'd be very careful. A ban is imminent.



I didn't insult, they opened their mouths and proved they are stupid. Facts are facts and if you are a boy, that is a fact. If you are a girl, that's a fact. If you smell, that's a fact. If you open your mouth and prove your stupidity, as long as you are not beligerent in defining that stupidity, you can call Stupid stupid, for Stupid is stupid.

"Stupid is what Stupid does."

If We cannot state FACT on here, then I don't want to be a part of fictional thinking.

Definition of INSULT:

1. A disrespectful or scornfully abusive remark or action

Definition of Scornful:

1. Feeling or expressing contempt or derision.

Definition of Contempt:

1.The feeling that a person or a thing is beneath consideration, worthless, or deserving scorn.
2.Disregard for something that should be taken into account.

So contempt is "disregard for something that should be taken into account" yet you are now telling me I am to disregard his stupidity, when it should be taken into account, since he is speaking LIES with his stupidity! But with your Logic, saying someone is speaking LIES, is an insult.


So if you think banning me bothers me, it doesn't. If you dew no know what an insult is and you want to ban me for supposedly insulting someone, when I didn't, then Forest's mother got it right!

Ribbit



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join