|
|
Topic started on 19-2-2003 @ 10:17 AM by nyeff
|
Has former President Bill Clinton hit the campaign trail again?
That's the word according to a Pittsburgh Tribune-Review columnist who reports a "major international move" is afoot to help install the ex-CEO of
the most powerful nation as the CEO of the most powerful world body ń the United Nations.
www.wnd.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
Click here for more Political Conspiracies topics
Hot Topics
|
Top Topics
|
This Week
|
Subscribe
|
Home
|
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 02:18 PM by xaos
|
He'll have my support.
XAOS
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 02:29 PM by nyeff
|
As much as I dislike Clinton I think he would be good fit with UN.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 02:49 PM by Bob88
|
that will just add to the joke that is the UN - imho.
Imagine Hillary as president and Bill as UN Sec. General.
we need another Butros. lol.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 03:10 PM by nyeff
|
Lets face it,the UN is nothing more than a debate club.Clinton is the best BSer there is.He could sell any policy.Clinton could sell an Edsel to the
French.(nobody needs an edsel)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 03:23 PM by Bout Time
|
The guy is brilliant, very well respected by the world, tenacious on the right causes and great at opening markets/establishing trade for US
corporations. He also has a jones for the spotlight and service, a.ka. Alpha Male disease!  He's gotta do something big & fast!
And you Right Wingers should stop bashing the UN. I don't see you making note that Israel has given the finger to more UN resolutions than Iraq OR
that the PM of Israel is the one charged with War Crimes.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 03:28 PM by mad scientist
|
I would have to agree BT as much as I dislike Clinton, he does have a brilliant mind. Unfortunately he doesn't have the resolve to match it.
I wonder how much animosity there would be if Clinton was UN chief and Bush was in office after winning a 2nd term. That is of course if the UN
survives in any capacity than just humanitarian relief orginisation.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 04:27 PM by ultra_phoenix
|
Originally posted by Bob88
that will just add to the joke that is the UN - imho.
Imagine Hillary as president and Bill as UN Sec. General.
I've a better idea BoB88.
GWB Sr at the UN and GWB Jr at the WH. What a mix !
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 06:27 PM by Bob88
|
There you go UP! Great combo!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 07:39 PM by All Seeing Eye
|
And Clinton could be in charge of Womans Rights globally. LOL
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-2-2003 @ 07:39 PM by Thomas Crowne
|
Let's see, brilliant mind (Ted Bundy was brilliant as well), has an allergy to the truth, and wants to destroy America. Yeah, I'd say he's the man
for the U.N. Heck, considering he did more damage to our sovereignty than any other president by signing more of our country over to the U.N. than
any other president, I'd say he's already been on their payroll, so they ought to make the grand poo-bah of the Anti-America Club!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 12:03 AM by MidnightDStroyer
|
Well TC, perhaps Clinton has done *more* harm during his reign than Bush has...But I'd add a qualifier to that sentence; "so far".
Once Bush has gotten the Homeland Security BS into full swing, he'll have succeeded in tearing down America into a tyrannical police state...Farther
than Clinton ever even *dreamed* of achieving.
Now: A few replies on the lighter side...
Originally posted by nyeff
As much as I dislike Clinton I think he would be good fit with UN.
Either that, or Clinton will start making everyone in the world start having "fits"...
Originally posted by ultra_phoenixGWB Sr at the UN and GWB Jr at the WH. What a mix !
Originally posted by Bob88
There you go UP! Great combo!!
A great combo? For *who's* benefit?
Originally posted by All Seeing Eye
And Clinton could be in charge of Womans Rights globally. LOL
...And all the time he spends at the Speaker's Podium, there'll be a woman hiding there giving him a hummer...Yeah, good choice for a
"spokesman".
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 06:41 AM by ultra_phoenix
|
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Yeah, I'd say he's the man for the U.N. Heck, considering he did more damage to our sovereignty than any other president by signing more of our
country over to the U.N. than any other president
2 question :
1) And GWB Jr, he can't take back these lands to the UN ?
2) Also, if the UN disappear, what will happen to these lands ?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 08:23 AM by All Seeing Eye
|
They revert back to the original country
[Edited on 21-2-2003 by All Seeing Eye]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 09:53 AM by Bout Time
|
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Let's see, brilliant mind (Ted Bundy was brilliant as well), has an allergy to the truth, and wants to destroy America. Yeah, I'd say he's the man
for the U.N. Heck, considering he did more damage to our sovereignty than any other president by signing more of our country over to the U.N. than
any other president, I'd say he's already been on their payroll, so they ought to make the grand poo-bah of the Anti-America Club!
Therapy......you've convinced me that deep layer, probably electro to boot, therapy is the only thing that would open your closed mind to see that GW
is the personification of the devil to the American way of life and is a 1000 times worse than even the propaganda flights of fancy you attribute to
our last elected president, Bill Clinton!
Fourtunately for you, I have a 30 year old Simplicity tractor and some commercial grade jumper cables....I think kicking off your boots, standing in
the 3ft of snow in my back yard & attaching a clamp to each ear lobe should work just peachy!!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 01:43 PM by Thomas Crowne
|
I agree with that qualifier, M-D, and I expect that in the end, volumes will be able to be written about the harm done between 2001 and 2008. What is
set in place now for good reason will later be used against us for sinister reasons. It could be that the sinister reasons are already being put into
place. I don't have time to research it, however, as I find myself continuously responding to B-T insane and baseless hatred toward Shrub.
And, furthermore, B-T, being an aircraft electrician, I rather enjoy electric jolts to the system. It is invigorating, and the self indulgance causes
the mechanics to fear you somewhat and not to steal your donuts off your toolbox!
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 02:04 PM by MidnightDStroyer
|
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
And, furthermore, B-T, being an aircraft electrician, I rather enjoy electric jolts to the system. It is invigorating, and the self indulgance causes
the mechanics to fear you somewhat and not to steal your donuts off your toolbox!
Heh! Better than an alarm clock to wake you up in the morning, eh?
Speaking as an electronics tech, why does it seem to me that techs that deal with electrical gear have more of a sense of humor than *mechanical*
techs?...Maybe we've taken one-too-many jolts into the funny bone?
At any rate, it's been my firm opinion for more than 15 years that anyone who *wants* to make a career in politics should be shot on sight...The only
thing that would mitigate this opinion is if politicians stopped acting like the stereotype that gives them such an infamous reputation. In all of
American history, I could count the number of *honest* & *responsible-minded* politicians without running out of fingers to count with.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-2-2003 @ 03:08 PM by Bout Time
|
Ok I admit it, I was just trying to melt a run for the dog so she can catch the snowmobilers, the therapy was only a secondary consideration!
Insane? Depends who you ask.
Baseless? Never!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |