It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Why do democrats hate so much? A thought to ponder.

page: 4
40
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:00 PM
link   
reply to post by mikerussellus
 


Weird thread Mike,

I see hate on both sides, I think the hate is by design-

I would say on a personal level the hatred for Obama is worse than even Bush.

I sort of don't know what to say Mike, I really think you have some red spectacles on there-




posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:05 PM
link   
Where do you people get this stuff? Have you ever stopped to consider mindless juvenalia such as this? Have you ever considered that time is an excellent test of a concepts validity? Do you really think, as a democrat, you are the first in history to have tried the destructive, anti-truth propositions commonly known as Bolshevism?

Or, in my mind the much more likely scenario, your kind has learned to mimic certain words that obscure your true motives: selfishness, greed and envy of those better endowed, more productive, happier or contented men you must suffer every day of your lives?

To this I say:

Dreams are bull#. Reality is based on experience. If you believe your dreams over reality, you are guilty of denying reality and the psychological dissoance so produced will push you to depths of hatred ordinary men will never know.

This is why those such as you are, traditionally, dispatched with extreme prejudice, often by armies, because the alternative to extinguishing your kind and the insane ideas propagated is chaos, anarchy, and even greater bloodshed.

It is ever thus when self-delusion and insanity gai nthe upper hand on reality. Democrat, Communist, Socialist, Bolshevik, Progressive, Social Justice, National Socialism, Fascism ... whatever name you attach to the principle that you and your alone (along with your coalition partners of course) are entitled to the fruit of another man's labor -- and moreover that he must be relived of them with the full power of the state if need be -- are barbarism, pure and simple.

It is, in a way, the ultimate "Revenge of the Nerds" -- the no can dos, the ne'er do wells, ganing up on the less numerous Successes to take what they cannot make.

This is why Samuel Colt invented the revolver, by the way, and Hiram Percy Maxim his machine gun: to stop people like you beofre you unleash the hounds of hell on an unsuspecting population.

Get thee on thy knees. Pray to God Almighty in repentance, asking forgiveness of your wicked, evil, selfish, greedy, murderous ways.


Originally posted by jupiter869
Democrats hate the 'status quo', the acceptance of things as they are. They dream of a 'better condition.' The fight to change, to improve, to move in a new direction is always feared and questioned and seen as hatred by those who are complacent for what is already established.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:25 PM
link   
reply to post by mental modulator
 


I don't know. When people were protesting they were called all sorts of names, the "hatred" was tangible. I've also seen it here to a lesser degree.

Sure you'll get it from both sides, but as one person, I try to use common sense to get my point across. Not the vitriolic anger that spews forth.

I just feel that as the majority EVERYWHERE within the halls of power in DC there wouldn't be that anymore. But it's still there. The anger, the hatred that the left feels to justify their actions.

When the right was in power, there were protests. And time and time again, I stated that everyone has the right. Heck, when Bush was in power, I watched Bill Mahr just to get a different perspective on things.

But when the shoe is on the other foot, people get vilified.

Just my humble observations.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:30 PM
link   
We don't.

It's like saying black people like chicken or white people can't dance.

You're stereotyping a whole classification of people and you should be ashamed of yourself. And if you're not ... well then, you're just like all other conservative ... ignorant.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by mikerussellus
Why does Obama need the republicans for his agenda? He has all the cards. He doesn't need them at all.


I didn't say that he does. You're right. In fact, it's one of the things I strongly disagree with Obama on. It's quite frustrating that he has this opportunity to get his agenda passed and he's not taking it. I mean, in the beginning, I appreciated his willingness to try, but it's been made clear that the Republican agenda is one thing only: Obama Must Fail. He's not going to get cooperation and I really wish he'd stop trying.


I suppose, being a left leaner myself, that I see the right as being more angry. But I know I'm biased. So, I'm probably not seeing things with an unbiased view. I think you should realize the same about yourself. The Democrats are no more angry than the right.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:39 PM
link   
I have to agree with those that say it goes both ways. The Republicans blamed everything on Clinton for a long time after he was gone (oh, I relish those days).

When GWB was finally confirmed as the next President of the USA my liberal neighbor came over to me and confessed how much he hated Bush -- really hated Bush...I looked him in the eye and replied, "Good...now you know how I've felt for the last 8 years."

That's Tribalism for you.

More koolaid please!



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Oh so true... thanks in part of course to such notable Democrats as Rush, Michael Savage, Billo and Glen Beck.
Republicans are all about the love.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by tyranny22
We don't.

It's like saying black people like chicken or white people can't dance.

You're stereotyping a whole classification of people and you should be ashamed of yourself. And if you're not ... well then, you're just like all other conservative ... ignorant.


Dude, white people can't dance. Get over it.


I'm not saying ALL are haters. I'm just saying that the HATE is more apparent, more vocal, more visceral. If you disagree with Obama, you are a racist, narrow-minded, bigot. I did not see this much anger when the republicans were in power.

edit to add; as for the liberal democrats out there that don't hate, there is still time. Listen to reason, c'mon into the conservative club. We'll allow it. It's ok. No one will hurt you here.


[edit on 11-10-2009 by mikerussellus]



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
reply to post by mikerussellus
 


Thanks for proving my point.

Ignorant.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by tyranny22
reply to post by mikerussellus
 


Thanks for proving my point.

Ignorant.


Perfect example of how some liberals (I won't say all) have no sense of humour.

Thank you for proving my point, my thread.

-cheers-



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 06:59 PM
link   
Hmm... looks like troll-bait to me. Even trolls have to eat, but they don't have to eat here.

Don't feed the trolls.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:04 PM
link   
Why have people claimed troll issues? Is it because this rings too close to home? Is the topic so off-setting, so close to actually being right that people will claim troll without taking a good look at themselves and how/why they say/feel a certain way?

I must admit, this appears to have touched some nerves.

Good.

Introspection now and then is a good thing.

There have been countless times where I have been given a sound thrashing and have walked away a better man because I have learned something.

Maybe those of you out there can come to the realization that name-calling, slurs of any type are self-defeating.

Maybe you guys can grow.

[edit on 11-10-2009 by mikerussellus]



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:05 PM
link   
reply to post by tyranny22
 


Read your last sentence. You accuse someone of stereotyping and then turn around in the SAME sentence and stereotype them!! :shk: No wonder the left has a bad reputation. Do you just not see it?



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:08 PM
link   
reply to post by joeofthemountain
 


Your post is very, very nasty. I hope you don't consider yourself a Democrat, because if you do, you are scoring up multiple points for the home team on this thread.

On the one hand you speak of "revolvers" and "machine guns" even in somewhat of a theatening way, and on the other you are recommending (to who???) getting on your hands and knees and asking forgiveness for wicked, murderous ways?

What's wrong with you?



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:12 PM
link   
OK, my thoughts, very quickly.

Yes, the Democratic party has it's problems and there have been, and no doubt still are racist democrats.... But I would bet my entire life savings that the same goes for the republican party as well.

I understand what you are getting at and your concern considering that the Dem's have the majority rule, but let us be honest. BOTH sides of the fence are full of corruption and both sides have issues with greed, abuse of power, and lots of other things...

This is not just a democrat problem and it is not just a republican problem. It is a government as a whole problem....

There is corruption on both sides that needs to be weeded out and destroyed... Lobbying needs to be gotten rid of because the politicians see the money in front of them and decide to vote the way the big companies want instead of the way the people want, as they are supposed to....

The corruption is everywhere in Washington... NOT just in one party.... And it is high time we do something about it other than just bicker about which side is more corrupt....

EDIT: Correcting a few typos...


[edit on 11-10-2009 by gimme_some_truth]



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by tyranny22
 


Read your last sentence. You accuse someone of stereotyping and then turn around in the SAME sentence and stereotype them!! :shk: No wonder the left has a bad reputation. Do you just not see it?


Thanks BH for pointing that out. Makes me think that there is hope for the world.

You and I are at opposite ends of most topics, but I have (gods, I hope) NEVER resorted to name calling. Neither have you. I can actually learn MORE by debating with someone I am at odds with, than discussing issues with people with the same viewpoint.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by tyranny22


You're stereotyping a whole classification of people and you should be ashamed of yourself. And if you're not ... well then, you're just like all other conservative ... ignorant.


I take it you are ashamed of yourself for stereotyping all Conservatives as ignorant? Not only are Democrats hateful, they are hypocritical.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by joeofthemountain
 


Your post is very, very nasty. I hope you don't consider yourself a Democrat, because if you do, you are scoring up multiple points for the home team on this thread.

On the one hand you speak of "revolvers" and "machine guns" even in somewhat of a theatening way, and on the other you are recommending (to who???) getting on your hands and knees and asking forgiveness for wicked, murderous ways?

What's wrong with you?


Lady, like I just wrote to BH, have great respect for you because of the level of debate (and enjoy your writing). We may not agree, but like proper repectable people, we can debate, and hopefully, learn.

Thank you.



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:18 PM
link   
Racism Revival: Dems. vrs. Rep.
www.pjtv.com...

This explains some of what is going on.

Historically, Democrats are for the expansion of slavery, and Republican push for individual responsibility and freedom. Republicans believe everyone is made to be equal despite ethnic makeup, and we should have the freedom to rise and fall according to our own ambitions. Democrats now and then seek ways to keep everyone divide into separate groups (hence the creation of hyphenated subcultures), so they can maintain a level of friction in society. (African-American; Asian-American, etc...)

It was and still is the Republicans who seek to unite everyone. What happened is that their voice got lost in the wake of corruption and Bush.

Modern Democrats use race to gain votes. If they can get a few more votes from helping a minority group, they will exploit our differences to gain popularity.

At this point in American history, both groups have become corrupt.

[edit on 11-10-2009 by Pathos]



posted on Oct, 11 2009 @ 07:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
OK, my thoughts, very quickly.

Yes, the Democratic party has it's problems and there have been, and no doubt still are racist democrats.... But I would bet my entire life savings that the same goes for the republican party as well.

I understand what you are getting at and your concern considering that the Dem's have the majority rule, but let us be honest. BOTH sides of the fence are full of corruption and both sides have issues with greed, abuse of power, and lots of other things...

This is not just a democrat problem and it is not just a republican problem. It is a government as a whole problem....

There is corruption on both sides that needs to be weeded out and destroyed... Lobbying needs to be gotten rid of because the politicians see the money in front of them and decide to vote the way the big companies want instead of the way the people want, as they are supposed to....

The corruption is everywhere in Washington... NOT just in one party.... And it is high time we do something about it other than just bicker about which side is more corrupt....

EDIT: Correcting a few typos...


[edit on 11-10-2009 by gimme_some_truth]


Thanks for chiming in (highly exaulted) mod, but I have to point out the hypocracy now. Charles Rangel vs Trent Lott. Won't go into detail, but I feel you are politically savvy enough to get the inference.



new topics

top topics



 
40
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join