Where do you people get this stuff? Have you ever stopped to consider mindless juvenalia such as this? Have you ever considered that time is an excellent test of a concepts validity? Do you really think, as a democrat, you are the first in history to have tried the destructive, anti-truth propositions commonly known as Bolshevism?

Or, in my mind the much more likely scenario, your kind has learned to mimic certain words that obscure your true motives: selfishness, greed and envy of those better endowed, more productive, happier or contented men you must suffer every day of your lives?

To this I say:

Dreams are bull#. Reality is based on experience. If you believe your dreams over reality, you are guilty of denying reality and the psychological dissoance so produced will push you to depths of hatred ordinary men will never know.

This is why those such as you are, traditionally, dispatched with extreme prejudice, often by armies, because the alternative to extinguishing your kind and the insane ideas propagated is chaos, anarchy, and even greater bloodshed.

It is ever thus when self-delusion and insanity gai nthe upper hand on reality. Democrat, Communist, Socialist, Bolshevik, Progressive, Social Justice, National Socialism, Fascism ... whatever name you attach to the principle that you and your alone (along with your coalition partners of course) are entitled to the fruit of another man's labor -- and moreover that he must be relived of them with the full power of the state if need be -- are barbarism, pure and simple.

It is, in a way, the ultimate "Revenge of the Nerds" -- the no can dos, the ne'er do wells, ganing up on the less numerous Successes to take what they cannot make.

This is why Samuel Colt invented the revolver, by the way, and Hiram Percy Maxim his machine gun: to stop people like you beofre you unleash the hounds of hell on an unsuspecting population.

Get thee on thy knees. Pray to God Almighty in repentance, asking forgiveness of your wicked, evil, selfish, greedy, murderous ways.

Originally posted by jupiter869
Democrats hate the 'status quo', the acceptance of things as they are. They dream of a 'better condition.' The fight to change, to improve, to move in a new direction is always feared and questioned and seen as hatred by those who are complacent for what is already established.

We don't.

It's like saying black people like chicken or white people can't dance.

You're stereotyping a whole classification of people and you should be ashamed of yourself. And if you're not ... well then, you're just like all other conservative ... ignorant.

Originally posted by mikerussellus
Why does Obama need the republicans for his agenda? He has all the cards. He doesn't need them at all.

I didn't say that he does. You're right. In fact, it's one of the things I strongly disagree with Obama on. It's quite frustrating that he has this opportunity to get his agenda passed and he's not taking it. I mean, in the beginning, I appreciated his willingness to try, but it's been made clear that the Republican agenda is one thing only: Obama Must Fail. He's not going to get cooperation and I really wish he'd stop trying.

I suppose, being a left leaner myself, that I see the right as being more angry. But I know I'm biased. So, I'm probably not seeing things with an unbiased view. I think you should realize the same about yourself. The Democrats are no more angry than the right.

I have to agree with those that say it goes both ways. The Republicans blamed everything on Clinton for a long time after he was gone (oh, I relish those days).

When GWB was finally confirmed as the next President of the USA my liberal neighbor came over to me and confessed how much he hated Bush -- really hated Bush...I looked him in the eye and replied, "Good...now you know how I've felt for the last 8 years."

That's Tribalism for you.

More koolaid please!

Oh so true... thanks in part of course to such notable Democrats as Rush, Michael Savage, Billo and Glen Beck.
Republicans are all about the love.

Originally posted by tyranny22
We don't.

It's like saying black people like chicken or white people can't dance.

You're stereotyping a whole classification of people and you should be ashamed of yourself. And if you're not ... well then, you're just like all other conservative ... ignorant.

Dude, white people can't dance. Get over it.

I'm not saying ALL are haters. I'm just saying that the HATE is more apparent, more vocal, more visceral. If you disagree with Obama, you are a racist, narrow-minded, bigot. I did not see this much anger when the republicans were in power.

edit to add; as for the liberal democrats out there that don't hate, there is still time. Listen to reason, c'mon into the conservative club. We'll allow it. It's ok. No one will hurt you here.

[edit on 11-10-2009 by mikerussellus]

Hmm... looks like troll-bait to me. Even trolls have to eat, but they don't have to eat here.

Don't feed the trolls.

Why have people claimed troll issues? Is it because this rings too close to home? Is the topic so off-setting, so close to actually being right that people will claim troll without taking a good look at themselves and how/why they say/feel a certain way?

I must admit, this appears to have touched some nerves.

Good.

Introspection now and then is a good thing.

There have been countless times where I have been given a sound thrashing and have walked away a better man because I have learned something.

Maybe those of you out there can come to the realization that name-calling, slurs of any type are self-defeating.

Maybe you guys can grow.

[edit on 11-10-2009 by mikerussellus]

OK, my thoughts, very quickly.

Yes, the Democratic party has it's problems and there have been, and no doubt still are racist democrats.... But I would bet my entire life savings that the same goes for the republican party as well.

I understand what you are getting at and your concern considering that the Dem's have the majority rule, but let us be honest. BOTH sides of the fence are full of corruption and both sides have issues with greed, abuse of power, and lots of other things...

This is not just a democrat problem and it is not just a republican problem. It is a government as a whole problem....

There is corruption on both sides that needs to be weeded out and destroyed... Lobbying needs to be gotten rid of because the politicians see the money in front of them and decide to vote the way the big companies want instead of the way the people want, as they are supposed to....

The corruption is everywhere in Washington... NOT just in one party.... And it is high time we do something about it other than just bicker about which side is more corrupt....

EDIT: Correcting a few typos...


[edit on 11-10-2009 by gimme_some_truth]

Originally posted by tyranny22


You're stereotyping a whole classification of people and you should be ashamed of yourself. And if you're not ... well then, you're just like all other conservative ... ignorant.

I take it you are ashamed of yourself for stereotyping all Conservatives as ignorant? Not only are Democrats hateful, they are hypocritical.

Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
OK, my thoughts, very quickly.

Yes, the Democratic party has it's problems and there have been, and no doubt still are racist democrats.... But I would bet my entire life savings that the same goes for the republican party as well.

I understand what you are getting at and your concern considering that the Dem's have the majority rule, but let us be honest. BOTH sides of the fence are full of corruption and both sides have issues with greed, abuse of power, and lots of other things...

This is not just a democrat problem and it is not just a republican problem. It is a government as a whole problem....

There is corruption on both sides that needs to be weeded out and destroyed... Lobbying needs to be gotten rid of because the politicians see the money in front of them and decide to vote the way the big companies want instead of the way the people want, as they are supposed to....

The corruption is everywhere in Washington... NOT just in one party.... And it is high time we do something about it other than just bicker about which side is more corrupt....

EDIT: Correcting a few typos...


[edit on 11-10-2009 by gimme_some_truth]

Thanks for chiming in (highly exaulted) mod, but I have to point out the hypocracy now. Charles Rangel vs Trent Lott. Won't go into detail, but I feel you are politically savvy enough to get the inference.