George Bush should have been given the Nobel Peace Prize, page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 36 times


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 02:33 PM by dodadoom
reply to post by Angus123



Amazing there are people still trying to justify this train wreck huh?
Know what you mean.
We really are screwed.
We will destroy ourselves with the most powerfull weapon yet, our ego.


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 02:41 PM by dodadoom
i]reply to post by KonigKaos


Just more proof this country was bought and sold a long time ago.
The politicians are put there to make us think we have some control!

Heres some more comedy for this funny thread!
[

[edit on 11-10-2009 by dodadoom]



reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 03:06 PM by dodadoom
reply to post by IamLael


Got news for ya.
We had an actual budget surplus when bush took office!
The tax cuts for the rich, cheney's false flag war costs and the
big banker bailouts sure didnt help us much did they?
Don't ya think there might have been a better way?

He's considered the worst president ever for a reason.
Do you know what a war criminal is?


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 03:13 PM by IamLael
reply to post by dodadoom



You're right about that surplus.

I'm sure you'll also remember that during Bush's presidency, Democrats controlled the House and Senate. You'll also remember that Congress controls spending, not the president. They had a veto-proof majority. So, don't blame Bush.

Search youtube and you'll find lots of Bush clips railing on about their spending and Bush attempting to garner support for reigning in Freddie and Fannie. All fell on deaf ears. No one cared about cutting spending. Remember how he raised the issue of Social Security insovency? The press sneered at his plan to partially privatize SS so we could actually keep some of OUR money.

The balanced budgets we enjoyed under Clinton happened because Republicans controlled both houses. Clinton had nothing to do with it.

Presidents have virtually no control over Congressional spending.


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 03:23 PM by dodadoom
reply to post by IamLael


I agree there is much blame to go around.
We can also blame the stupids for voting in these so called wonderful 'leaders'!
Thanks for the reply!
Funny thread! Love it!


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 03:30 PM by NOTurTypical
reply to post by andrewh7



Dude, Kofi Annan stated his opinion of what he thought should have happened, but his opinion doesn't trump the international laws in place governing war.

These are fact:

1. The first gulf war was ended by a cease-fire armistice
2. The UNSC found Iraq in material breach of said ceasefire in resolution 1441.
3. Under International Law the US could resume conflict with Iraq.

Opinions don't change facts. That's a logical fallacy.

Now, if there had been a peace treaty signed with us and Iraq in 1991 then the war would have been unjust, this is not the case. facts are facts man, and anyone's opinion on the matter don't change the laws as they are currently written.


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 03:43 PM by manxman2










reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 04:18 PM by The Vagabond
Originally posted by StinkyFeet
1. He signifiganlty increased aid to the African continent.


It's not altruism when you help people who think just like you, ignore others, and start wars on the side, and end up turning a profit. Sure US aid to Africa tripled, mostly going through Christian groups fighting AIDS. But this was also preconditioned on policies of privitization and opening of markets- US trade in Africa doubled at the same time. (for those of you who think that sounds like a good thing, consider the way the US trades- Ethiopia grows and exports coffee while children starve).

2. He helped to rid the world of a huge number of terrorists.


He created a net increase in terrorism. Many of the young men who we killed in Iraq were minding their own business in Syrian and Jordanian colleges until we sent a bunch of hopped up teenagers into their region brandishing automatic weapons.

When George Bush came into office, terrorists controlled virtually nothing in Iraq, posed substantially less threat of conquering Pakistan than they do now, and in Afghanistan were primarily concerned with fighting amongst themselves.

3. He worked for peace between Israel and the Palestinians, well until they elected a bunch of terrorists in Hamas to be their leaders.


That's right. George Bush stops working for peace the minute FREE DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS don't go his way.

4. He worked to concentrate terrorist fighting into Afghan and Iraq, so the rest of the world was more safe from Terrorism. In fact, he kept our country safe from any major terrorist attack for 7 years and drove the numbers of attacks around the world down.


Tell that to the several members of our coalition who were beaten into submission by terrorist attacks on their home soil after they let us coerce them into the war in Iraq. Also tell Pakistan, Sudan, Somalia, Indonesia, etc.

5. He rid the world of the evil dictator Sadaam Hussein.


Yes, now the people of Iraq don't have to worry about being tortured in secret prisons. Unless of course the CIA gets its hands on them.

6. He set the people in Afghanistan free from the hands of the Taliban and their restrictive and ridiculous laws that are harmful to women.


The Taliban is still firmly in control of much of Afghanistan and has a "permanent presence" in 80% of the country. Even areas which used to be relatively safe from the Taliban are now seeing violence on a weekly basis.


Don't get me wrong, I acknowledge the growing appearance that two unwinnable wars are going to make either a Carter or a Nixon out of Obama (in that either he'll be hideously ineffective or that he'll eventually go out of his mind as inherited problems continue to steal his thunder- or both). The award of the prize to Obama was an enticement and not a recognition of results in my opinion.
But give me a break, Bush? Do you really think that any politician is any better than any other just because he has a different letter after his name? Virtually to the man, our leaders are a pack of maniancs, criminals, and dimwits- in many cases all of the above rolled into one.


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 04:36 PM by noangels
reply to post by jerico65



Why is he a geek fly boy?I personly think a bullet to his brain is far too quick he should rot in jail for his crimes with the other liars,but I gave him a star for that beutifull image of bush fadeing to black.

and as for resolution 1441 mentioned above by another poster,that didnt allow america to wage war on Iraq unless the UN agreed to it-and they didnt

Looks like the bush lovers are trying to rewrite history,he was and will always be remembered as one of the worst presidents

The chump was a cheerleader at school,that says it all!
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^