This is your paranoid gun culture..., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 11:34 PM by Lillydale
reply to post by GradyPhilpott



I know that cars kill more people. If you were paying attention, I am not a big fan of idiot drivers either. Your analogy is not apt. Everything you listed a gun being for is still the result of injury or death. That is what a gun is for. Do not try and twist it. There is no other purpose for a gun but to injure or cause death. I think it is wonderful that you can pretend guns have some other noble purpose but the truth is, guns are made to injure or cause death. That is what they are for. That is what they are designed to do. That is why they are made.


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 11:35 PM by ANOK
reply to post by GradyPhilpott



Who are you accusing of being a 'leftist'?

Is anybody who does not follow your outdated view on life and politics a leftist?

You by declaring yourself a 'rightist', as you just did by your comment, you have no credibility in my book, you're a follower with a head full of other peoples ideas.

Left and right are both irrelevant terms that only succeed in pigeon holing opinions and dividing us along unnecessary lines.

I'm right, left, neither, and everything in between. In other words I'm Human, and will not allow my thoughts to be bound by other peoples ideas, labels, and restrictions.


Edit; Oh btw I mentioned cars also, of course I understand that guns are not the only danger, but the thread is about guns, you want to talk about the ravages of cars start another thread. Maybe in that auto forum you wanted?

[edit on 10/10/2009 by ANOK]


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 11:44 PM by GradyPhilpott
reply to post by Lillydale



In a concrete, reductionist analysis you are correct, but you will note in my last post, I spoke of abstractions.

The OP states that the woman who was tragically killed by her fiancé, was killed because of our paranoid gun culture, when actually she was killed by accident.

The OP doesn't allude to any other factors that might have caused the poor man in question to be frightened during the night like living in a neighborhood where home invasions have occurred or simply, where the crime rate is high. He alleges that since the woman was killed by a gun, she must be a victim of something sinister like the paranoid gun culture.

Guns are made to kill and injure, but not senselessly or by accident. That is why we have gun training and certain laws that require training and why we have organizations such as the NRA.

My reference to autos is apt because if the OP is going to fault a supposed culture because people misuse a tool, then perhaps that standard should be extended to other misused tools, such as cars.

You see, this is what I mean by drawing abstractions.

[edit on 2009/10/10 by GradyPhilpott]


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 11:54 PM by GradyPhilpott
reply to post by ANOK



It is the left who for more than half a century has been using the misfortune of others to make make a case for infringing on the Second Amendment.

If you are not among that number then the statement was not directed at you.

Rudy Giuliani calls himself a Republican and he has used this ploy as well.

The tactic is equally disingenuous and reprehensible regardless of who uses it.

[edit on 2009/10/10 by GradyPhilpott]


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 12:12 AM by watcher73
Originally posted by Lillydale
reply to
post by GradyPhilpott



I know that cars kill more people. If you were paying attention, I am not a big fan of idiot drivers either. Your analogy is not apt. Everything you listed a gun being for is still the result of injury or death. That is what a gun is for. Do not try and twist it. There is no other purpose for a gun but to injure or cause death. I think it is wonderful that you can pretend guns have some other noble purpose but the truth is, guns are made to injure or cause death. That is what they are for. That is what they are designed to do. That is why they are made.


Target shooting.

Maybe cars should have been invented solely to kill since theyre better at it.


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 12:14 AM by SpacePunk
reply to post by Lillydale



Yes, that's why weapons are made. Whether it is a gun, knife, axe, or a pointy stick. They all can be used for killing. Killing another human when you are left with no other choice, killing another animal for food/shelter/clothing, even killing plants for food/shelter/clothing. I don't make any bones about it, myself. I am ex-military. I don't 'target practice', I practice killing. I don't buy a gun for recreation since they are not toys. Toys are for recreation, guns are for killing. Anybody that says differently are just kidding themselves.

The guy is a Class A idiot, and should be punished as an example to others if anything.


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 12:18 AM by watcher73
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott

The analogy is apt, depending on one's ability to abstract and one's knowledge of the function and purpose of firearms.

A firearm is a tool that is used to harvest food, protect one's self and others from predators, and also provides recreation.

Both the car and the firearm can be misused, but both can be used for good.

Oh, cars kill far more often in our country than guns do.

In 2006, there were more than
42,000 automobile deaths in the US. In the same year there were more than 30,000 gun deaths in the US.



Both figures are tragic, but it should be even more alarming that a product that is not intended to "cause injury or death" kills so many.

I guess we could also discuss the drug-abuse culture which destroys lives, but has no positive social benefit whatsoever.


Autos win by a mile for killing since half of that 30k gun deaths are suicides.

No you cant discuss the drug abuse culture a)because you are wrong and b)youd be way off topic. The big pharma companies produce all kinds of drugs that are probably more abused than any illegal drugs, yet medicine still has a positive social benefit.

[edit on 11-10-2009 by watcher73]

[edit on 11-10-2009 by watcher73]


reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 05:25 AM by moniker
Originally posted by ANOK
Police: Man Kills Fiancee On Eve Of Wedding...

www.wmur.com...

He thought he had an intruder, he shot the intruder.

The intruder was his fiance, he was about to marry the next day.

Don't get me wrong I feel for the guy, I can't imagine the hell he's going through right now. But is this a sign of a country driven to complete paranoia?


The gun lovers will no doubt claim that the guns are not the problem but rather that the fiance should have carried one too so she could have defended herself.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Did Carl Sagan know something?
  Posted 19 days ago with 277 member flags
Earthly coincidences...or not.
  Posted 15 days ago with 122 member flags
The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe
  Posted 17 days ago with 86 member flags
Denver Airport Allows Camera Crew in Underground Facility
  Posted 17 days ago with 83 member flags
10 People Whose Warnings Went Unheeded
  Posted 3 days ago with 77 member flags