It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by defcon5
reply to post by Lillydale
I think the point was to see if someone could do it on any particular day, not necessarily that particular day. There was nothing special about the weather that day anyway; there was no storm, no severe wind gusts, etc. They could set the pressure to whatever they wanted to, and as long as the alt is set accordingly it would not make any significant difference. Now if they had done it in a thunderstorm, I would agree with you, but that was not the case.
BTW I was defending his stance on the topic because you specifically asked me about it. You were trying to discredit me by discrediting him. Not working out the way you thought though, so I guess now we have to flip to another tactic.
This test has already been done by several commercial airline pilots, and check airmen. One of which was an ex USAF pilot.
The only time they could accomplish the 'mission' was to slow down to landing speeds and even then it was difficult.
Keep in mind, these pilots have tens of thousands of hours in a 757/767!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
ANY questions??????
Although I admit I didn't bother to read your whole post...
I also never seen a seasoned 75/76 Capt as you claim to be, trying so hard to brag about his experience on an internet forum...
It's clear you have not listened to the interviews with P4T pilots who have actual time in the aircraft reportedly used on 9/11.
Secondly, it is also clear you haven't viewed their latest presentation.
....while interviewing Capt Rusty Aimer, 75/76 Capt for United. Rusty describes how hard it was to land on a Carrier, at landing speeds, in a 757 United Airlines sim, in perfect conditions. Matter of fact, Capt Aimer describes "almost too perfect". He sheared the gear on the side of the carrier.
Weedwacker, why have you refused to email P4T, Ralph Kolstad (75/76 Capt, Topgun Twice), Rusty Aimer, or Rob Balsamo?
You won't get banned at P4T if you do not personally attack P4T as you do here and as trebor, reheat and others have done. Can you debate civilly?
I think the laymen know why you refuse to sign up at P4T. After all, even the laymen here doubt your credentials.
Certainly the real pilots reading your posts know why.
2. Why do you refuse to directly debate members of P4T?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
You seem top be able to personally read 'CSV'...well good for you!
Originally posted by weedwhacker
OH...and I STILL don't have "excel"...why not 'dumb it down' for me, 'cause you already have that opinion...it is evident in your attitude.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
and I get a "download' gift!! Swell!!!
AA77 FDR Data, Explained
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Look....you silly link goes to a P4T posting, and I guess I'm supposed to click the "link" in there, and it comes up something called "WinRAR zip"
THEN it says that WinRAR is "NOT free software", and offers an option to purchase for a "40-day free trial"
Wait....let me see if someone ELSE has also looked at the SAME info from the CSV...and interpreted it properly....oh, yeah....JREF!!!!!
AA77 FDR Data, Explained
(OH...it's from 2006!!! Imagine that???)
www.forums.randi.org...
I guess the reason I keep saying that P4T refuses to debate is that P4T refuses to debate. That wasn't so hard, was it?
I dislike being accused of telling lies, especially when the accusers are conspiracy liars. In six years of deranged screaming, this gaggle of frauds and fools have produced bogus science, distorted quotes, and a blizzard of outright falsehoods, but not a shred of real evidence to support their pernicious myths.
My phone conversations with Rob Balsamo were taped without my permission....
Originally posted by weedwhacker
My phone conversations with Rob Balsamo were taped without my permission....
Originally posted by pomeroo
I just received another call from Rob Balsamo. He was quite civil and impressed me with his sincerity in wanting a substantive debate on the FDR and related matters. I agreed to apologize for lumping him in with Ranke and Marquis and promised I would continue my effort to find opponents for tomorrow's CLOUT.
What can I say? The people here who are qualified to discuss the subject should step up to the plate. There is no satisfactory reason for missing this opportunity to address a fairly large audience.
Can you explain why such a man ... (is).... never willing to debate P4T directly?