AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Space Exploration discussion forum.  (rss)


War Waged Moon by USA!


<<  1    2    3  >>

Topic started on 10-10-2009 @ 06:27 AM by spacecowgirl


Yes, USA, in it's usual disregard for the Universe and it's arrogant warmongering ways, declared war on the moon and nuked it on Friday, 9 October 2009.

USA told the unwitting public that they were searching for water whilst they directed a bomb towards a crater on the moon. The faulty premise surmised that they would be able to see water in the up shot of debris. The public fell for this faulty reasoning without a voice heard in dismay against it.

The "nuke for water" scandal went ahead without one nation in the world heard in outcry against it. NASA then showed a faked computer room with a handful of fake computer technicians talking amongst themselves with nervous fake "bombing moon NASA talk" and the screens went predictably blank at moment of impact.

USA and the silent world can hang their head in shame over this sad and ugly affair.
No good came from bombs and certainly, in the history of the world at least, no water has ever been found by them at least.

To have a fake small office with some fake +menial office employees shown as the ones pulling the trigger on the NASA bombing of the moon was again meant to downgrade the severity and the actual truth of the ugly NASA mission of bombing the moon.

Shame on the dark forces who have done this and who will lead us on the path of darkness in the blindness for power. A disgusting dirty day for the world, make no mistake about that. AMERICANS hang your head in shame that you didn't stop this!



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Space Exploration topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:35 AM by superdebz


hmmm
who to believe
some crazy person on the interwebs orr lets see em nasa?
I think ill go with nasa thank you.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:36 AM by Chadwickus


So let me get this straight.

You're upset about the moon being bombed but also think it was faked....??





Riiiiiiight....





   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:40 AM by akkad


Originally posted by spacecowgirl
Yes, USA, in it's usual disregard for the Universe and it's arrogant warmongering ways...




Err...You do know Stargate Atlantis is fictional, don't you?

Just checking.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:43 AM by spacecowgirl


reply to post by Chadwickus



I think USA did bomb the Moon to USA's eternal shame! Do I think that you, the unwitting public got to see any of it? No.

I think the world was given the "staged for public viewing" version so they could keep spending your trillions of tax payer money on nuking and warmongering the universe.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:46 AM by spacecowgirl


reply to post by akkad



err...you do know that you are at war in the middle east, don't you?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:48 AM by spacecowgirl


reply to post by superdebz



So you think that bombing for water is perfectly acceptable reason to nuke the moon? For how many trillions of your tax dollars?

Have you ever heard of anyone bombing for water ever? Let's be logical here. It was not water they were after.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:56 AM by Chadwickus


reply to post by spacecowgirl



Not sure where you're getting the nuke idea from because it's not true, with so many telescopes pointed at the moon a nuke being set off would surely bet spotted.

What was impacted on the moon was a space craft the size of a small bus, far from being a nuke.

And I have to ask, why now are you concerned about things being slammed into the moon? There are many craft that have crashed onto the moon since the 60's

Then there is all the equipment left from the luna landings...

Why aren't you upset with the crafts that impacted Venus? Or Mars? And there are no doubt others but those are those are the ones off the top of my head.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:59 AM by superdebz


Originally posted by spacecowgirl
reply to post by superdebz



So you think that bombing for water is perfectly acceptable reason to nuke the moon? For how many trillions of your tax dollars?

Have you ever heard of anyone bombing for water ever? Let's be logical here. It was not water they were after.



Yep i do.
Cause i have something that we in the real world like to call a "brain"
just cause your scientificly retarded doesnt mean the rest of us are.
And it was trillions of dollers it was 79 million.
And it wasnt a nuke.
And they bombed it to examin the debris.
Just like in partical colliders.
So why dont you try and do some reserch first kay?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:00 AM by spacecowgirl


Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by spacecowgirl




And I have to ask, why now are you concerned about things being slammed into the moon? There are many craft that have crashed onto the moon since the 60's

Then there is all the equipment left from the luna landings...




For a start, there was no lunar landing ever. If there was, USA would be there "drilling for water" by now. No wait, by now they would have condo's for rent and a McDonalds



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:01 AM by spacecowgirl


reply to post by superdebz



Well if you want to believe the line you are fed, so be it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:06 AM by BLV12


Originally posted by spacecowgirl
Yes, USA, in it's usual disregard for the Universe and it's arrogant warmongering ways, declared war on the moon and nuked it on Friday, 9 October 2009.

USA told the unwitting public that they were searching for water whilst they directed a bomb towards a crater on the moon. The faulty premise surmised that they would be able to see water in the up shot of debris. The public fell for this faulty reasoning without a voice heard in dismay against it.

The "nuke for water" scandal went ahead without one nation in the world heard in outcry against it. NASA then showed a faked computer room with a handful of fake computer technicians talking amongst themselves with nervous fake "bombing moon NASA talk" and the screens went predictably blank at moment of impact.

USA and the silent world can hang their head in shame over this sad and ugly affair.
No good came from bombs and certainly, in the history of the world at least, no water has ever been found by them at least.

To have a fake small office with some fake +menial office employees shown as the ones pulling the trigger on the NASA bombing of the moon was again meant to downgrade the severity and the actual truth of the ugly NASA mission of bombing the moon.

Shame on the dark forces who have done this and who will lead us on the path of darkness in the blindness for power. A disgusting dirty day for the world, make no mistake about that. AMERICANS hang your head in shame that you didn't stop this!



And your proof of all this is what? That you know it's right and NASA must be lying?
Did you stop to think that the rest of the world didn't make a peep because NASA was doing exactly as it said it was going to do?

Where is your proof and evidence that it was a fake room full of fake computers and fake computer technicians?

War declared on the moon? Why would they do that...?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:16 AM by spacecowgirl


reply to post by BLV12



Ok so USA spends $79 million to bomb for water on the moon and has a handful of people in front of screens with scripts beside them in a mocked up office. Then when screens go blank, they quickly thumb through script! Then start nervous NASA chat on the mics? Oh dear oh dear. Can you spell the word fake?



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:17 AM by Chadwickus


reply to post by spacecowgirl



Here's a list of all space craft that have landed or impacted on other planets:

en.wikipedia.org...

A few of note from the moon:

Luna 2 - USSR - 13 September 1959 - First lunar impact.

Hiten - Japan - 10 April 1993 - Lunar orbiter, intentionally crashed at end of mission.

Lunar Prospector - USA - 31 July 1999 - Lunar orbiter, intentionally crashed into polar crater at end of mission to test for liberation of water vapour (not detected).

Chang'e 1 - China - 1 March 2009 - Lunar orbiter, intentionally crashed at end of mission.

Kaguya - Japan - 10 June 2009 - Lunar orbiter, intentionally crashed at end of mission.

So why now are people jumping up and down???



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:22 AM by mblahnikluver


Why dont you read these threads:

Nasa Lacross Live Feed

centar thermal signature confirmed

Lacross last minute before impact




There was no nuke! It was a centaur rocket with a satellite. Also you thinking those people were fake that's just funny. I assure you they were real people in a real room giving real feedback. I have met some of the people where I work who worked on this moon mission and its very real. I told them we shouldnt do it and I also told them I believed NASA was looking for something else. So you might want to read up before you come on here with claims of false people, false rooms and a nuke...There wasnt a nuke!


NASA will tomorrow launch a spectacular mission to bomb the Moon. Their LCROSS mission will blast off from Cape Canaveral, Florida, carrying a missile that will blast a hole in the lunar surface at twice the speed of a bullet. The missile, a Centaur rocket, will be steered by a shepherding spacecraft that will guide it towards its target - a crater close to the Moon's south pole. Scientists expect the blast to be so powerful that a huge plume of debris will be ejected.


This was launched in June of this year. It held the rocket that went into the moon. I watched this launch when it happened! Nothing in it says NUKE.

NASA Mission



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:29 AM by Unregistered


Nah. Waging war against the moon doesn't bring in money.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:35 AM by divinetragedy79


I'm with the majority on this thread. I agree that this was a simple mission to attempt to extract information. While I do believe that there might exist alien life, I think the OP is grasping at straws.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:41 AM by R-evolve


Many people have bought certificates claiming they own land on the moon, whoever owns the certificate that nasa bombed should declare this as an act of war; run into nasa head quarters and start walloping every geek they can find, next step the US military head quarters ( this may be trickier and have consequences ).



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:50 AM by Damezthe2nd


Where is everyone getting this nuke idea from, it was hardly even a bomb.
For those thin on imagination, or those that need to dim down their imagination. Imagine a two tonne washing machine getting shot at the moon from a weird space catapult and you have just about got it.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:58 AM by spacecowgirl


reply to post by Damezthe2nd



Since when did a exploding a bomb become like dropping a washing machine?



   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>





























































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.269 seconds
Page processed in 0.271 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.