Originally posted by Osiris1953
No there isn't any confession that I could see from the link provided. Just a lot of conjecture, and truth stretching. If I threw a pile of sticks on
the floor, someone would find some symbology in them. That's all this is. Looking for something in nothing in order to validate a belief that can not
effectively be proven.
Typical obfuscation and disinfo. Watch the film. Danny even wears and Apollo 11 shirt on him.
Kubrick's wife has been reported to be a fan of this film too.
Why do you think NASA helped Kubrick film "2001: A Space Odyssey"?
Check this out. It's very compelling.
Jay Weidner, producer of the Kubrick Odyssey films, explains in this interview with James Fetzer about the obvious evidence and signs in the moon
photos and videos that the whole thing was filmed in a studio by Stanley Kubrick. He brings up some new evidence that I haven't heard before. He
believes that we did go to the moon, but that the photos and videos from NASA are clearly faked without a doubt. Movie directors in 1974 had already
known about this but were too scared to point it out.
Some of his key points that are new to me:
- Many of the photos clearly had second and third lighting sources, which means they were in a studio because they did not bring additional light
sources on the moon. Propagandists falsely claim that the second light sources were reflections from the ground, but that's not true because the
luminosity of the moon's surface is the same as asphalt, or cement highway roads, which has very little luminosity.
- You can see a line apparent in many moon photos separating the foreground and background, indicating a fake background. Jay explains how front
screen projection works and explains why a glass screen in the background was necessary, which is why you see the line, with a totally different
texture in the background. He went into detail about this in his "Kubrick's Odyssey" film but it's been pulled from YouTube because he prefers
people buy it from him.
- The photos show the foreground and background in focus, which is optically impossible because any photographer knows that you can't bring both the
foreground and background into focus at the same time, unless the background is fake and so is already is in focus.
- In low gravity, 1/6 of the Earth's, the astronauts should be moving FASTER, not 40 percent slower. Kubrick did this because he couldn't make them
walk faster and make it look realistic at the same time.
He makes a lot of practical sense. This is all very easy to understand and you will slap yourself in the head for not realizing it sooner.