reply to post by ArMaP
But that's not what the person who claims to have taken these pictures saw is it? They saw a UFO, damn better get a picture.... they then saw what
does look like a cow * suspended* in mid air and a UFO.. well better take a picture of that. That the pictures are blurred are the cameras problem not
the person's problem.
This is Argentina, pretty much, the only large mammals in the country are Cattle and Horses. This is cattle country so everyone living there is pretty
darned clued up on what cattle look like in any given situation.
Maybe it's a balloon shaped like a cow that just happened to be floating by at the time there was a UFO sighting. See, I don't see any motion blur,
i see a shape that, unbelievably, the shape not only resembles a cow, but one that has been sedated, its' neck lolling over to onside. I saw that
before the photo analysis even mentioned it. That doesn't mean it definitely is that, but right now, ideas that it's a bird, or whatever, doesn't
seem to have much credence at all.
There's no motion blur, to suggest it is anything actually flying, but something lifted into the air. Now yes, could be a balloon or something else
that is lighter than air. fair enough, but that still leaves a picture of something that looks remarkably akin to the ship in the, "Trent
photograph*, to explain away.
The jury's still out on the photos authenticity, but let's not make any mistake here. The lass took the pictures because she thought she saw a UFO
with a cow suspended in mid air. Not, *oh that's a funny shape i think i will take a photo*
Yes, you can argue she is projecting onto the photos what she wants to see. Then again, you could equally argue she wouldn't have taken the photos
had it been something so unbelievably mundane,. lets get this right she claims that both UFO and the cow, vanished. Not resolved themselves into
wholly mundane objects, there's there's a huge difference.
However, i first looked at the photos thinking.. "Yeah right and I'm the King of Siam", but my thoughts of how it might be a cow seem to have been
bolstered, rather than, diminished by the analysis.
I suspect, the problem with this picture is simple. Many will want to see something unexplained, but mundane, when in actual fact, if genuine, it is
something mundane in an inexplicable situation and something completely unexplained , in the same picture.
the trurh is, an inert cow, looks like a cow whatever situation you put it in. It's not like a bird that has moving parts that cause motion blur on a
single photo frame. There is no blur here, motion wise. That would suggest it is an inert object in the sky.
Furthermore, the, supposed UFO, looks like a UFO in both pictures and has exactly the same shape and same characteristics. What would be the chance of
snapping something that has flapping wings appearing exactly so in 2 different pictures taken as much as 3-4 minutes apart?
Show me the pictures you have taken, over a 3-4 minute period where, exactly the same anomaly crops up from a different distance?
[edit on 13-10-2009 by FireMoon]
