Barack Obama's Nobel Prize is manipulated

Barack Obama's Nobel Prize is manipulated - Proof, page 2

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 09:03 AM by thedigirati

Until Obama won this award I had really NOT seen the hand of the "dreaded" (alleged) "NWO"in a real concrete way. I feel this was a "JIC" for Obama.
I find it fascinating that they knew,(TPTB) even back then, that the Olympics, would not be in Chicago, so "they" saved him a "bonus.
The TPTB (whom ever they may be) miscalculated the reaction, it was supposed to elevate Obama, but it turned him into a joke......... Perhaps that was the intent, to force him into Iran to save face.

I feel no mater what else happens, this was a turning point in our history.

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 09:07 AM by SANTA CLAWS

Originally posted by Chance321
Wow, the nobel prize for doing . . . . . ? Doing. . . . . ? Hmmmm, what has he done??? Hey! I got it! The Nobel Prize for spending the most money in the shortest time since elected?

The man has done nothing

Nothing

He did NOTHING to deserve to be President.

Change

That's all millions have in their pocket because of this man.

All Hail Obama -- the man who does NOTHING and Gets Everything

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 09:33 AM by thedigirati

reply to post by SANTA CLAWS

When ya say it out loud like that it's kinda creepy.

it's almost like he is "magical" (mystical?)

Hmm who would ever have such powers???????

in 3 years someone went from no where to President and Noble laureate,
Obama should play the Lotto

"Only in "murica!!"

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 09:49 AM by nerbot

All designed long ago as part of the ploy to cause unrest through disatisfaction and anger and create anarchy which will ultimately lead to.....FEMA Camps.

Thank goodness I live in the back of beyond somewhere other than america.

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 02:42 PM by jeasahtheseer

Why exactly did he even win this prize? What peace or good has he brought to the world? He's done nothing.

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 05:37 PM by entermemo

Perhaps everyone in this thread should re-read this statement made earlier . . . .

"Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful.

Fact: More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments."

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:45 PM by ANNED

what do Carter, gore and obama have in common
they were democrats and they were or are becoming disliked by the people that elected them.
Carter was one if the most disliked presidents of this country.
we all know what many people think of Gore and his global warming scam.

And so far Obama is not doing very good at repairing the economy.
and his job rating is falling as fast as unemployment is rising.

So far not of them are in the class for will liked presidents and none have done what Ronald Reagan did
A peaceful end to the Cold War. that should have easily got Reagan the Nobel peace prize.
execpt for the fact that Reagan was a republican.
en.wikipedia.org...

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 06:54 PM by PowerSlave

Originally posted by entermemo
Perhaps everyone in this thread should re-read this statement made earlier . . . .

"Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful.

Fact: More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments."

No need to re-read it. The fact is, the nomination was done by Feb 1. In order for Obama to "see the effort through" there would have to be an "effort" to begin with prior to his presidency let alone after his inauguration.

Obama is a great orator but talk is cheap. Actions speak louder than words.

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:00 PM by The Legacy

Originally posted by Annee
_ Myth: The prize is awarded to recognize efforts for peace, human rights and democracy only after they have proven successful.

More often, the prize is awarded to encourage those who receive it to see the effort through, sometimes at critical moments.

I agree that they might have given the prize as an incentive for him to do more effort in peace, however i wonder if he just would do the opposite and take it as he is doing everything right and should keep on his path

reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 07:01 PM by Hellmutt

reply to post by PowerSlave

Yes, the nomination was made by Feb 1. But he didn't win the peace price by Feb 1. He won it based on stuff he has made after Feb 1 too. They didn't filter out everything the nominees have made after Feb 1.

Btw, Obama apparently "played a key role" in getting this deal set up and signed. It has been dubbed the event of the century.

reply posted on 11-10-2009 @ 10:13 AM by entermemo

"No need to re-read it. The fact is, the nomination was done by Feb 1".

The review process lasted from March till August. He wasn't chosen to win on Feb 1st.

reply posted on 12-10-2009 @ 09:48 PM by trey85

Funny soon as he wins it,he turns around and sends no telling how many more troops to afghanistan lol.Peace will never =WAR

reply posted on 12-10-2009 @ 09:52 PM by stevegmu

reply to post by Hellmutt

Other than sending H. Clinton for the photo-op, how, exactly was Obama involved? He wasn't even present.

reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 05:01 AM by Hellmutt

reply to post by trey85

He didn't start that war (Bush did). Maybe he has found out that the best way to win the peace at this point is to not withdraw the troops?

reply posted on 19-10-2009 @ 07:00 PM by maus80

Is it possible that this Nobel was meant for McCain, and when he didn't win, the agenda behind it had to be quickly switched over to Obama?

Since the elite agenda behind obviously has more to do with the prize than the president himself, it seems possible to me that they were confident that McCain would be elected, and had to rush in "plan b" in all it's ugliness and seeming absurdity.