It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Setting the Rules of the Road" - Obama to Speak Live at 2PM

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 06:46 AM
link   

Setting the Rules of the Road


www.whitehouse.gov

Outdated rules regulating the financial sector have affected millions of Americans and contributed to the nation's worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.
(visit the link for the full news article)

 




[edit on 10/9/2009 by JacKatMtn]

[edit on 9-10-2009 by StoneGarden]




posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 06:46 AM
link   
Well congrats on the Nobel Prize.... but it seems Obama will be wanting to create a NEW branch of Government... yes, Watch the whole Vid... then Note at 2:45 of the Vid what is said by Austan Goolsbee...

"Tune in to WhiteHouse.gov/live at 2pm eastern to watch and discuss the event."

Is it just me, or has there been alot of news concerning Obama his morning??

www.whitehouse.gov
(visit the link for the full news article)

 



Mod Edit - Headline: Please use the original story headline from your source.

[edit on 10/9/2009 by JacKatMtn]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 06:53 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



See my Sig instead, sorry for "Off Topic"

**Tries to raise leg enough to kick self in the nuts"

[edit on 9-10-2009 by NotAgain]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 06:55 AM
link   
reply to post by StoneGarden
 


What strikes me as odd, while I am doing more research is the time this note was posted on the White house blog. It was posted at 6:45 am.... that was like an Hour AFTER Obama won the Nobel Prize??



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:00 AM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:03 AM
link   
Obama's new branch of gov't .... 'wealth redistribution branch'.
The US Constitution will be irrelevant and considered 'outdated'.




posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:05 AM
link   


A mistake.... @ 40secs of the vid, makes a good point... Alot of nice words/ no practical deeds... and apparently i still don't know how to add vids lol



edit to say.... nevermind about the vid line

[edit on 9-10-2009 by StoneGarden]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:08 AM
link   
I didn't think it was that off topic, I was giving my opinion that Obama is the new Hitler. Sorry if I offended the Obama sheep, what has this world come to


**Smack palm of hand in face**


[edit on 9-10-2009 by NotAgain]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:18 AM
link   
reply to post by StoneGarden
 


I dont know about over in the US but where I come from (UK) Obama is never off the news along with the moronic David Cameron and his time for change campaign


Everywhere you look its mirrors in the belly at the moment.

As for the nobel prize, dont get me started on irony again





posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by NotAgain
I didn't think it was that off topic, I was giving my opinion that Obama is the new Hitler. Sorry if I offended the Obama sheep, what has this world come to


**Smack palm of had in face**


[edit on 9-10-2009 by NotAgain]


Well Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Just mentioning one of the many corrupt people because its a fact.




posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:20 AM
link   
reply to post by NotAgain
 


I wasn't offended at all myself...

*snip*...


Archbishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa is stating "It is an award that speaks to the promise of President Obama's message of hope."

Maybe it is a way of trying to hold Obama accountable for his future actions??

edit for spelling and change of opinion...

[edit on 9-10-2009 by StoneGarden]

[edit on 9-10-2009 by StoneGarden]

[edit on 9-10-2009 by StoneGarden]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:22 AM
link   
reply to post by XXXN3O
 


Yup nothing but Obama in the UK news I can confirm that one, then again Obama and Blair are going to be presidents of the world so can you blame the media. People like Alex Jones and David Icke said it was going to happen 10 years ago, how many people laughed at them.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:25 AM
link   
reply to post by StoneGarden
 


I didn't think anyone would be offended, and I didn't think it was off topic but hey I'm not a moderator so it's there choice "I respect there choice"

The song and words are in my Sig....


Well Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Just mentioning one of the many corrupt people because its a fact.


I know but it was still off topic?


When the past nominations were released it was discovered that Adolf Hitler was nominated in 1939 by Erik Brandt, a member of the Swedish Parliament. Brandt retracted the nomination after a few days.[8] Other infamous nominees included Joseph Stalin and Benito Mussolini. However, since nomination requires only support from one qualified person (e.g., a history professor), these unusual nominations do not represent the opinions of the Nobel committee itself.Source




[edit on 9-10-2009 by NotAgain]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:31 AM
link   
*snip* Problem solved. Thank you.

*snip*...

[edit on 9-10-2009 by StoneGarden]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 07:33 AM
link   
Scrap that I am already on minus points...


[edit on 9-10-2009 by NotAgain]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 09:46 AM
link   
Am I the only one thinking that if seven agencies were corrupted. (Proven in scandals such as Madoff's) then one agency would only be easier to corrupt? Anybody else remember the saying about power and absolute power?



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:39 AM
link   
reply to post by MikeNice81

 


I would agree with you on this one, But I don't think he is absolving everything into one... I believe the intentions are "is the establishment of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. The CFPA will streamline and consolidate regulatory agencies now in place to more effectively promote transparency, fairness and accountability for financial products and services." as stated on the W.H.Blog

So what exactly does that mean? And what could be the pros and cons?

In terms of exactly.. I have no Idea other than an opinion.... Everything will have to be put through this single agency for approval one would be led to believe...

So "Absolute Power" is definitely worth looking into. What limits would this Branch have? Hopefully he is transparent in his address at 2PM today...




new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join