It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by ocker
No, she didn't witnessed it, she witnessed someone saying that, it didn't witnessed the action being done.
Right, a round shadow! And I noticed that there were pine trees, now I don't know where this area was or what, you, pretty close to the ground what I saw but I didn't see outline of the continent. But I did notice that there was shadow under this white dot and I also noticed that the trees were casting the shadows in the same direction as this shadow of the circle of this aerial phenomena because it was higher than the trees but not too much higher than the trees but it was close to the ground and it was spherical but slightly elongated, not very much but slightly. I then said, is it a UFO? And he said, "Well I can't tell you." And then I asked him, "What are you going to do with this piece of information?" And he said, "Well we have to airbrush these things out before we sell these photographs to the public." So I realized at that point that there is a procedure setup to take care of this type of information from the public.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
No one has yet proven anything nefarious by NASA and lunar photographs as far as airbrushing alien structures or any sign of alien activity on the moon. Yes, the video and some photos show what may be tampering but nothing else.
Originally posted by mcrom901
go to.... www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
use the following values....
Desired Resolution (Current: 1 pixel = 1 kilometer)
Image size in pixels: 768x768
leave the sensor box at the default UVVIS and the filter box at 415_nm
click on the "Use Lat/Long" button.........
Originally posted by ArMaP
The video is right, the way I was looking for the tampering was wrong.
That image in the link provided by Phage, for example, and other NASA sites show that same effect, as we can see below.
(click for full size, although not the original full size, the original is too big for ATS)
No, you should check the updated version of the Clementine Image Browser and not the one that became obsolete years ago.
Originally posted by mcrom901
you should check this.......
go to.... www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
Originally posted by mcrom901
you should check this.......
go to.... www.cmf.nrl.navy.mil...
use the following values....
Desired Resolution (Current: 1 pixel = 1 kilometer)
Image size in pixels: 768x768
Latitude: 68
Longitude: 346
leave the sensor box at the default UVVIS and the filter box at 415_nm
click on the "Use Lat/Long" button.........
there you have it....
To me is a clear evidence that points to the use of some tool to copy pieces of the sky over other areas of the sky. The fact that the shapes are repeated perfectly makes me think of a digital alteration of the image.
But that is clearly a sign of alteration, I can't think of anything natural on a photo to make it look like that.
Crosshair Knockout
FOX narrator: "For reference, crosshairs were permanently etched into the lunar cameras, so they would have to appear on top of every image. But in this photo, a crosshair is behind a part of the lunar rover." David Percy then opines: "This situation is impossible and has to be the result of technical manipulation and doctoring of the image." Clue: in each example FOX showed of an object appearing to be over a crosshair, the obtrusive object was sunlit and bright white, such as these examples:
Question: why do crosshairs vanish over sunlit white objects?
Answer: strong luminosity can washout thin lines.
Test: hair across lens is washed out by sunlit white paper.
With no atmosphere on the Moon, sunlight is stronger.
In this test a strand of hair was taped across a camcorder lens, which was then pointed at a sunlit white paper. While my test failed to vanish the hair-line completely, it demonstrates that diffuse solar reflection on a white surface can wash out a thin line. This result is sufficient to render the phenomenon of crosshair vanishing over sunlit white objects not anomalous. Also reflective intensity and thus crosshair-knockout potential would be greater on the Moon with no atmosphere to reduce solar intensity.