It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lunar bombing - Nasa TV live feed

page: 10
20
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:09 AM
link   
So this is what the so called most advanced space agency on this planet is capable of. A blip on a graph, no visual data, a lot of speculation as if it happened in a dream instead of reality. I got to hand it to them, they are top notch actors.




posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:10 AM
link   
He just said he spent 15 minutes with the images before the conference.
Earlier he said he worked with them for an hour.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:10 AM
link   
Just maybe they actually did bomb the Nazibase on the moon cause Obama is afraid of competition in his peacekeepin efforts?



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:11 AM
link   
reply to post by broli
 


Nah, I think they'll be able to evidence a debris cloud.
I mean, their spectrocity graphs show quite a bit of "chaos", if you will.

I'd also bet that they'll end up with photographic evidence of said cloud.
Of course there will be a lot of people that don't believe them. But that is pretty much a given around these parts.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:12 AM
link   
maybe those 2 tiny flashes that we saw in the thermal was the space craft hitting the moon;

they did kind of say the craft was very low tech;

but those 2 little flashes mustve been like 50 to 100 miles from the target crator...

[edit on 9-10-2009 by DjSharperimage]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:13 AM
link   
All those years ago NASA did a broadcast from the moon.

Why are they unable to produce a live broadcast with footage of the moon bombing?

That on its own is simply baffling.



[edit on 9-10-2009 by XXXN3O]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:14 AM
link   
reply to post by DjSharperimage
 


The craft DID hit the moon. That was part of the plan.
2nd line.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:14 AM
link   
reply to post by JayinAR
 


Yeah I'm sure the countless telescopes that were looking were all a degree off. We just need to give the NASA photoshopers some time to paint us a believable cloud. I predict in 2 months times.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:15 AM
link   
reply to post by DjSharperimage
 


There where more than two flashes on the infrared imaging. Check it out.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:17 AM
link   
reply to post by broli
 


Or maybe, just maybe, they were wrong about the density of the cloud and it simply wasn't visible from any of the ground based telescopes?

Hubble wasn't looking for a debris cloud.
That pretty much leaves the orbiting imaging... I'll bet they'll be able to tinker with the contrast or something and show a cloud.

But as I said previously, and you just confirmed, there will be no shortage of people who call them a fraud.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:17 AM
link   
reply to post by XXXN3O
 


I totally agree. This is what I was thinking... If they want to see if there is water. Why not fly some people to the moon. We did it way back then, should be very easy for them now.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:18 AM
link   
my prediction on what he said to the guy giving him some skin

Guy to High fiver " It didn't work, the impact was minimal The moon is going to kill us now, dumbass"

I mean seriously what are the chances this is a " Armageddon " type Mission to see How impacts affect Space objects and the moon is just the test dummy so we can have knowledge incase future deflecting/impacting is needed.

[edit on 9-10-2009 by icemax2005]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:20 AM
link   
On the high-five thing. My money is on the idea that the dude realizes this is like make or break time for NASA and, as has been pointed out, the expected debris cloud wasn't visible initially.
Dude was worried and he was immediately in "number crunching" mode.

And yeah, he was probably thinking the dude was a dumbass.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:20 AM
link   
Hmmmmm is there a black box on that bomb??? Maybe it will surface 60 years later that it was all a hoax!



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:22 AM
link   

Originally posted by HrdCorHillbilly
reply to post by DjSharperimage
 


There where more than two flashes on the infrared imaging. Check it out.




im thinking those little flashes were the craft hitting the moon; then the 2nd or 3rd little flashes miles away in the thermal was the craft bouncing across the surface;
then they just zoomed in on the camera to make us think the video was coming from the craft when it was not




[edit on 9-10-2009 by DjSharperimage]



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:23 AM
link   
i watched it on the telly and the control room they were using looked like a small internet cafe, u cant even see where the money has been spent, as for video footage, it was realy pixely and in slow mo


what was the piont in this mission ???????



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:25 AM
link   
reply to post by KDM_Souljah
 


The point of the mission?
To blast a hole in the lunar surface and then sniff the debris for the presense of water.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:28 AM
link   
reply to post by DjSharperimage
 


You need to add the underscore and dash for the link to work.

I don't think that's the case. If it made a crater, why would it bounce?
Seems to me if it made a crater the object would stop dead in tracks.
Could be debris flying off...I guess.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:29 AM
link   
At least - this is a military training.

And you can allways consider all those nasa photoshoped stuff - as a military experimentation -

That is showed to us - in totally different point of view from the real one ( SECURITY , military, politicaly , economically ... ).

"Ho ho ho - this is for space exploration - for humanity in peace in deep space, bla bla bla" ( stfu stupid scientist )

The only reason daarpa and nasa was build is to keep MILITARY POWER - in space.

They said against Russian - but well - i don't know all the story.



posted on Oct, 9 2009 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by texasboy1022
Hmmmmm is there a black box on that bomb??? Maybe it will surface 60 years later that it was all a hoax!


I guarentee we will NEVER see complete and accurate Data and Images from Nasa..

lets not forget they are a government agency and have to conform with all Need to know protocols and to be honest our government hasn't had a great track record for honesty even involving the most mundane subjects..

I am willing to bet that nasa has some of the best imaging Equiptment on this planet and to present us with this quality image " For Public Viewing" is a smack in the face to everyone.



new topics

top topics



 
20
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join