The Real Reason USA is bombing the Moon ~ A NEW Weapon!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 9 times


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 08:25 PM by Zaphod58
reply to post by Where2Hide2006


The point of a weapons test is to test said weapon in the most realistic possible way. Testing Rod From God on the moon would be great, if we were going to attack the moon. The point of the weapon is to launch it ballistically through the atmosphere to impact a target. If this was an actual RFG test, you would meet NONE of those parameters. You are artificially accelerating the projectile, dropping it through a non-existant atmosphere with zero air resistance, not to mention the accel would be ALL wrong because of the rocket and moons gravity...


reply posted on 10-11-2009 @ 08:35 PM by Alethea
Originally posted by debunky
The math:
F=m*a
E=m*v


F=ma
FEma



reply posted on 16-12-2010 @ 05:19 AM by jrmcleod
reply to post by Where2Hide2006



I'm sorry but wouldnt the rod need to be travelling in excess of 20,000mph to destry a whole city? Asteroids travel at about this speed so simply falling to earth wouldnt be fast enough. They would need to be propelled. And i would imagine the distance required to get to 20,000+ mph would be quite vast even with an engine.

No???


reply posted on 16-12-2010 @ 08:00 AM by mdiinican
While we're doing thread-necromancy,

reply to
post by jrmcleod



Pretty much. In terms of energy, you're only getting back a fraction of how much energy there was in the fuel it took to launch the thing into space in the first place. Even the biggest tungsten rod we could launch with any rocket ever built falling down from orbital velocity wouldn't deliver the energy of a kiloton level nuke.

They were never intended to flatten cities, and they will never be deployed because it would look just like a nuclear attack right up until it actually hit, and that is the sort of thing you shouldn't be giving people false alarms over.

And like has been said before, shooting one at the moon would be an awful test because de-orbiting a tungsten rod through atmosphere accurately onto a buried bunker is the hard part, and throwing something at the moon wouldn't teach us anything useful about that. We have already known for several thousand years that throwing something really heavy at something will tend to damage it.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 11 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 16 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 15 days ago with 6 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 4 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Taking the Crowd Out of Firing 155mm Artillery.
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags