Is terrorism a hoax?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 08:17 PM by jvm222
Long story short, yes.



reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 08:22 PM by John_Brown
reply to post by Donnie Darko



"Terrorist" exists in the same metaphorical realm as "infidel" or "blasphemer". It is a rhetorical device, a figure of speech, a trope, and as such doesn't exist. It is a convenient term to invoke connotations of all the sorts of things that define a terrorist. It is not static, or dependent on the signifier for meaning; it's interpretation is up to the beholder.

There is no "Al Qaeda", just as there is no real NATO or UN. It is simply an idea, an agreement, and when the name "NATO" is invoked it is understood that NATO represents certain interests, certain people, and has an agenda. When insurgent groups carry out their operations, create websites, and make statements and identify themselves as "Al Qaeda", they are making a similar statement as to their intent and what they stand for.

As for the 20th century origins of terrorism, or terrorist acts as a viable tactic, look no further than the Nazis. Otto Skorzeny, Hitler's top commando, made friends with Yasser Arafat and Qaddafi after the war. Otto was an expert in guerilla tactics and unconventional warfare. He, and many other ex-Nazis, lent their expertise to the Palestinians, along with any other violent organizations opposed to Israel and jews. Fascism has close ties to terrorism. It's not the whole story, but a good place to start.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 08:24 PM by Sharrow
reply to post by John_Brown

No, not the Nazis again. Can we skip the Nazi topic just one more time? Please?

Terrorism has no connection to them at all. It's just a label, nothing more. Some are calling the Palestinians are terrorists, others are calling the Israelis as terrorists. It's only a point of view, presenting who is the evil from one side's view. But that doesn't mean automatically that's the truth.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 09:32 PM by Blackmarketeer
Behind every great lie there's a bit of truth. Real terrorist attacks (Lockerbie, truck bomb on US marine barracks in Beirut, Japan subway, etc.) are the perfect cover for staged events (i.e. false flag) that had us begging TPTB to shred our constitution and give us the police state we now have.

Terrorism isn't a complete hoax, but then intelligence agencies that snoop on "terrorist networks" can just as easily plant "signs" that other agencies pick up and view as a real threat - allowing for a false flag operation to be carried out and full blame to be given to the "terrorists", and further exacerbating the need for a fully-encompassing police state to "protect" us.

In the past, false flag operations would be used to lead into a war that we (or the perpetrators of the op) would benefit from. The false flag op would make an enemy nation the scapegoat, such as the "Gulf of Tonkin" incident which goaded America into war in Vietnam, "which handed President Johnson the carte blanc charter he wanted for future intervention in Southeast Asia."

"Operation Northwoods" was another false flag event that would be blamed on Cuba, giving then Joint Chief of Staff Lemnitzer the excuse he needed to go rampaging through Cuba and even heavily Cuban populated areas of Florida (pro-Cubans were going to be framed for domestic acts of terrorism)

But planting seeds of war through false flag attacks works far better when it's not being used to frame countries, but rather secretive, evil terrorist organizations that could be anywhere, or at least in countries you'd like to invade. Operation Northwoods, with a little updating, became 911. The very "freedom fighter" we aided and supplied arms and intelligence to, Osama Bin Laden would be groomed into the very face of evil by his former benefactors.

The threat of terrorism is a boon to the Pentagon, it's military suppliers, and a segment of the federal government that want's total dominion over it's citizenry, no questions asked. It's a never ending war that can be morphed into any direction. This doesn't mean real terrorists don't exist, only that they are occasionally helped out by a far more sinister group planting false flags. Like I said, behind every great lie (terrorism false flags) is a bit of truth (real terrorists).


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 09:39 PM by stevegmu
reply to post by Blackmarketeer



Are you talking about England? The US is certainly no police state, although the city I live in is pretty strict at enforcing driving laws.
Why would the federal government want to control everyone, and who are these mindless robots who would work for a government agency who would go along with such a plan? Most people I know work for the government in one way, or another, and none are mindless robots as many on here would think. Regular people work for the government, most of whom would expose such wild plans about population control.
in case you didn't know, it is nearly impossible to keep secrets in DC. Someone always talks.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 09:49 PM by stevegmu
reply to post by Aelur



We have what are called elections of politicians who can stop war. Why do you think our government wants to be in a perpetual state of war? War costs money and lives.
Really? What news channels are you watching?



reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 09:59 PM by Aelur
reply to post by stevegmu



If you think that democracy really works, and that you can really elect a politician who cares for your people, I wonder what kind of news are you watching. And please don't put words in my mouth, I never said governments wanted to be in a perpetual state of war. They just created a situation around a disaster that enabled them to get their hands on the middle east, and manipulated people through the idea of a 'big bad terrorist' to create a common enemy people would like to fight against, therefore gaining support.
Lives are meaningless in the political game, they're just numbers. Money? In modern western wars you never lose money, because wars are profittable. The money goes into the wrong pockets, of course. Your government isn't going to win contracts or anything, but the private parts behind the political figureheads will do.


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 02:16 AM by chiron613
What we call terrorism is simply how a much weaker group fights a stronger, more organized one. The Muslim world isn't altogether thrilled by the US presence in its countries, especially when we support brutal, corrupt regimes that cater to our demands. Lacking an army to fight us, they resort to "terrorism". It is terrorism, but it is the only way to fight.

We (the US) did something similar with England. We had no well-trained, organized army; the British did. So we resorted to unconventional warfare, attacking unpredictably, shooting from behind trees, ignoring all the rules of war. In the meantime the British remained in ranks, marched together (instead of breaking up), and adhered to conventional forms of fighting. That was one reason they lost. Another reason was that they were fighting the entire population, not just an army.

We're doing the same in Iraq and Afghanistan. We try to fight conventionally; they use IED's, car bombs, suicide bombs, all sorts of unconventional and often unpredictable tactics. Since it is the population fighting us, not armies, we stand to lose in both wars. How can we win, when the entire country wants us out of there? And who's going to surrender? Who's even got the authority to surrender?

Even if we wind up killing bin Laden, that won't stop the war. It could give us an excuse to stop fighting, which would probably be a good thing. But Al Quaeda will continue on without him. It's a loosely-knit grouping of fighters, motivated primarily by hatred of the US. That hatred is fueled by our continually killing civilians in a country where we don't belong. It won't end until we leave the countries.


reply posted on 9-10-2009 @ 02:28 AM by notreallyalive
reply to post by Donnie Darko



I feel the same way, both in the way you mentioned and in America. If there are so many terrorists why aren't they crashing into gas trucks, and blowing up malls??


reply posted on 10-10-2009 @ 08:23 AM by December_Rain
This first question is what exactly is Terrorism?

Legal Dictionary
Main Entry: ter·ror·ism
Pronunciation: 'ter-&r-"i-z&m
Function: noun
1 : the unlawful use or threat of violence esp. against the state or the public as a politically motivated means of attack or coercion
2 : violent and intimidating gang activity terrorism> ter·ror·ist /-ist/ adj or noun —ter·ror·is·tic /"ter-&r-'is-tik/ adjective
—[size=1]Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc. [/size]

Source:
dictionary.reference.com...

I dont think the whole terrorism issue is a hoax but it is certainly over-hyped and is being used to attain political goals. Terrorism is not just limited to muslims but all kind of races, religious terrorist are there.

Jihad , often mistranslated as "holy war," literally means "struggle." or to struggle to improve one's self and/or society." Thus jihad imo is not terrorism.

Terrorism is the act of scaring people for a social or political reason using violence (or threat of violence). A person who uses terrorism is called a terrorist.

Terrorirsts for me are people who pretend to be jihadists but have other goals behind it such as imposing Sharia Law, , stealing land forcefully in case of Palestine (including other strct religious laws), for goals like money, personal profit, religious goal (bible/torah/quarn) increasing own power or in simple words are doing it as a profession.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



You heard of SOPA and PIPA.Now ACTA! Must read.
  Posted 19 days ago with 25 member flags
On why America is in denial and Ron Paul will not be elected
  Posted 17 days ago with 21 member flags
Study says racists and conservatives are dumb
  Posted 6 days ago with 16 member flags
Is ‘anti-Canadianism’ the new ‘anti-Americanism?’
  Posted 16 days ago with 8 member flags
Clarification on the definition of "natural born citizen"
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags