Here another link for enlightenment :
savecivilization.org...
"Ban the Koran" says Dutch politician, page 7
privacy
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 08:04 PM by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by De La Valletta
please don’t yell – it isn’t necessary, it’s childish, and it doesn’t make what you’re saying any more pertinent
also – don’t be ridiculous
I know that there are – everybody is aware. So – what is your point then?
Do you have any idea at all what it is I’ve been trying to say? I wonder...
no doubt. it says something – but not nearly enough
it shows exasperation – and anger – at people who are willing to say some really ugly things – yet never seem to have the balls to explain or defend what they’re saying
it’s the result of disappointment to the point of desperation at how willing people are to hate – and not just hate people who might have it coming, but whole groups of people – innocent people
disgust at how easy it is to look away when some individuals decide to treat these people badly – and unfairly
outrage at people who know that people are afraid – and play on that so they might accomplish their nasty goals uncontested
shame at being connected in any way to a people who will tolerate any abuses committed because “maybe they deserve it”
I’m tired of lazy thinking
so – it may say something about me – not even close to what I’m really feeling – rat’s ass was the very least of it
you’re wrong
this is my country as much as it is yours – so don’t you even start with this
it’s not yours to claim – not yours to decide what it is and what it isn’t
this country belongs to many different types of people – you can say it all you want, as often as you want – and as loudly as you want – but this country does not belong to the Christians
you’re exactly right
why should I believe anything you say?
further – why should I hate an entire group of people based on anything you say?
so, Jamal is a terrorist - you say – how do you know?
this should be interesting
[edit on 10/13/2009 by Spiramirabilis]
OKAY , THEN. DENY THERE AREN'T ANY!
please don’t yell – it isn’t necessary, it’s childish, and it doesn’t make what you’re saying any more pertinent
also – don’t be ridiculous
I know that there are – everybody is aware. So – what is your point then?
Do you have any idea at all what it is I’ve been trying to say? I wonder...
"I don't give a rodent's hind end about the rest of the paragraph." It says something about you.
no doubt. it says something – but not nearly enough
it shows exasperation – and anger – at people who are willing to say some really ugly things – yet never seem to have the balls to explain or defend what they’re saying
it’s the result of disappointment to the point of desperation at how willing people are to hate – and not just hate people who might have it coming, but whole groups of people – innocent people
disgust at how easy it is to look away when some individuals decide to treat these people badly – and unfairly
outrage at people who know that people are afraid – and play on that so they might accomplish their nasty goals uncontested
shame at being connected in any way to a people who will tolerate any abuses committed because “maybe they deserve it”
I’m tired of lazy thinking
so – it may say something about me – not even close to what I’m really feeling – rat’s ass was the very least of it
...this is in a "Christian" country .
you’re wrong
this is my country as much as it is yours – so don’t you even start with this
it’s not yours to claim – not yours to decide what it is and what it isn’t
this country belongs to many different types of people – you can say it all you want, as often as you want – and as loudly as you want – but this country does not belong to the Christians
BUT here's the killer , how would you know if I knew them or not?
(Other than me telling you so e.i hearsay)
you’re exactly right
why should I believe anything you say?
further – why should I hate an entire group of people based on anything you say?
so, Jamal is a terrorist - you say – how do you know?
this should be interesting
[edit on 10/13/2009 by Spiramirabilis]
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 08:25 PM by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by Jinni
:-)
so - it's not just me then?
What we have here are brainwashed, hypnotised, conditioned with hate posters that do nothing but post anti-muslim poppycock as if they are being paid $$ by the blog post.
:-)
so - it's not just me then?
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 08:53 PM by De La Valletta
reply to post by Jinni
Judge 1 billion people I did not , for half of these billion are innocents who know no better and will only grow to be what their society and hearts make them. Unless you're saying all one billion are jihadist?
If you want you're welcome to judge me.
But I will gladly admit I will judge a JIHADIST MUJIHADEEN.
They , my onetime friends may have become mad, manipulated, forced (such is the nature of the beast) but they definitely didn't work for the C.I.A they worked against it;not for me and you but for their religion. we should be fighting our own war against the COMMUNIST.IMPLOSION of.AMERICA.
This is the WEST , we scrutinize religions lest they become overzealous , we bash Christianity and Judaism everyday in some way or other even though christian values shaped our world and success. So why is it that when someone critiques about islam and it's JIHADIST/MAHDIST tendencies;which would be erring on the side of caution, we are deemed misguided , muslim-haters.
Is it ONE WAY MULTICULTURALISM you seek then!
JIHAD is what I hate. Not my fault islam teaches it. That genocidal war against the non-believer.so if you're a JIHADIST ,watch out! Normal muslim trying to live and let live , no problem.
Now you can tell me how much you love jihadist terrorists and how I'm wrong to hate them.
(WE SHOULD ALSO SCRUTINIZE BIG GOV AND BIG BUSINESS TOO)!
Judge 1 billion people I did not , for half of these billion are innocents who know no better and will only grow to be what their society and hearts make them. Unless you're saying all one billion are jihadist?
If you want you're welcome to judge me.
But I will gladly admit I will judge a JIHADIST MUJIHADEEN.
They , my onetime friends may have become mad, manipulated, forced (such is the nature of the beast) but they definitely didn't work for the C.I.A they worked against it;not for me and you but for their religion. we should be fighting our own war against the COMMUNIST.IMPLOSION of.AMERICA.
This is the WEST , we scrutinize religions lest they become overzealous , we bash Christianity and Judaism everyday in some way or other even though christian values shaped our world and success. So why is it that when someone critiques about islam and it's JIHADIST/MAHDIST tendencies;which would be erring on the side of caution, we are deemed misguided , muslim-haters.
Is it ONE WAY MULTICULTURALISM you seek then!
JIHAD is what I hate. Not my fault islam teaches it. That genocidal war against the non-believer.so if you're a JIHADIST ,watch out! Normal muslim trying to live and let live , no problem.
Now you can tell me how much you love jihadist terrorists and how I'm wrong to hate them.
(WE SHOULD ALSO SCRUTINIZE BIG GOV AND BIG BUSINESS TOO)!
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 08:56 PM by poet1b
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean the question wasn't answered.
By conquest by the womb the Palestinians, and all Muslims aiming for this goal, have forced their women into servitude, so that they can force them to have large numbers of offspring, so that eventually they will out number their enemies by adequate numbers to conquer their enemies.
Pointing out this fact is not saying that Muslims should not be able to reproduce like you claim, it doesn't even come close to what you claim.
I have heard the numbers thing, but you might want to consider that it doesn't have anything to do with whites. This isn't just going on in Europe, in it going on everywhere Muslims gain a foot hold.
It is not white people who are in danger of being wiped out, Black Africans are the ones most likely to go first. Have ever bothered to learn about what is going on in Somalia? Do you think they will stop with Somalia?
Europe is already turning hostile against Islam. They are already electing politicians who are willing to do something about the problem, and they will start to enact more and more laws to stop the radicals in Islam. If that doesn't work, eventually, they will decide that they no longer feel guilty about the holocaust, and the blood will flow like the rivers. Especially considering the terrible things that Arabs are doing in Africa as we speak.
Like I said from the beginning, you do not know the definition of right and wrong, and the things you write show just this. Thanks for proving me right, once again.
Just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean the question wasn't answered.
By conquest by the womb the Palestinians, and all Muslims aiming for this goal, have forced their women into servitude, so that they can force them to have large numbers of offspring, so that eventually they will out number their enemies by adequate numbers to conquer their enemies.
Pointing out this fact is not saying that Muslims should not be able to reproduce like you claim, it doesn't even come close to what you claim.
I have heard the numbers thing, but you might want to consider that it doesn't have anything to do with whites. This isn't just going on in Europe, in it going on everywhere Muslims gain a foot hold.
It is not white people who are in danger of being wiped out, Black Africans are the ones most likely to go first. Have ever bothered to learn about what is going on in Somalia? Do you think they will stop with Somalia?
Europe is already turning hostile against Islam. They are already electing politicians who are willing to do something about the problem, and they will start to enact more and more laws to stop the radicals in Islam. If that doesn't work, eventually, they will decide that they no longer feel guilty about the holocaust, and the blood will flow like the rivers. Especially considering the terrible things that Arabs are doing in Africa as we speak.
Like I said from the beginning, you do not know the definition of right and wrong, and the things you write show just this. Thanks for proving me right, once again.
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 09:08 PM by poet1b
reply to post by babloyi
I am not making any assumptions, I am merely repeating what I have read and heard. Plenty of people here on the thread presenting the evidence. I have posted many links backing up what I am stating.
If people want to wear head gear outside to protect them from the weather, fine, but like in the days of the past, take it off when they go in doors. When it is hot outside, no, can't wear them.
Can't go nude either. A woman can dress professionally in a manner so that she will be taken seriously if she wants. No one is trying to ban pant suits for women, or long dresses.
No woman wearing a burqa will ever be taken seriously in the Western world.
The clear reality is that by banning burqas and headscarves, no women can be forced to wear them. This is the purpose.
I am not making any assumptions, I am merely repeating what I have read and heard. Plenty of people here on the thread presenting the evidence. I have posted many links backing up what I am stating.
If people want to wear head gear outside to protect them from the weather, fine, but like in the days of the past, take it off when they go in doors. When it is hot outside, no, can't wear them.
Can't go nude either. A woman can dress professionally in a manner so that she will be taken seriously if she wants. No one is trying to ban pant suits for women, or long dresses.
No woman wearing a burqa will ever be taken seriously in the Western world.
The clear reality is that by banning burqas and headscarves, no women can be forced to wear them. This is the purpose.
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 09:29 PM by De La Valletta
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
I DIDN'T YELL. I TYPED.
If you got that much emotion out of that , WOW your sensitive.
Tell that to the people in Darfur. I will continue to be vigilant. You can keep your anger.
If it wasn't a christian country then why'd you recognize it as such.
Also I could also be talking about any of the 300 odd countries in the world that aren't muslim countries , oh I forgot it's not their country , tell that to them.
I know who I know. Known them since we were children , ah the innocence of a child. As I said you can believe it or not. That's the nature of a blog.
PEACE!
I DIDN'T YELL. I TYPED.
If you got that much emotion out of that , WOW your sensitive.
it shows exasperation – and anger – at people who are willing to say some really ugly things – yet never seem to have the balls to explain or defend what they’re saying
it’s the result of disappointment to the point of desperation at how willing people are to hate – and not just hate people who might have it coming, but whole groups of people – innocent people
disgust at how easy it is to look away when some individuals decide to treat these people badly – and unfairly
outrage at people who know that people are afraid – and play on that so they might accomplish their nasty goals uncontested
shame at being connected in any way to a people who will tolerate any abuses committed because “maybe they deserve it”
Tell that to the people in Darfur. I will continue to be vigilant. You can keep your anger.
If it wasn't a christian country then why'd you recognize it as such.
Also I could also be talking about any of the 300 odd countries in the world that aren't muslim countries , oh I forgot it's not their country , tell that to them.
I know who I know. Known them since we were children , ah the innocence of a child. As I said you can believe it or not. That's the nature of a blog.
PEACE!
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 09:29 PM by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by poet1b
:-)
and thanks for answering my question - finally
it only took you 2 days to finally man up
your high opinion of me tells me just as much about you
I'm pretty sure we're done here
Like I said from the beginning, you do not know the definition of right and wrong, and the things you write show just this. Thanks for proving me right, once again.
:-)
and thanks for answering my question - finally
it only took you 2 days to finally man up
your high opinion of me tells me just as much about you
I'm pretty sure we're done here
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 09:33 PM by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by De La Valletta
you must be joking
I don't believe it
and you know why
cheap shot
If it wasn't a christian country then why'd you recognize it as such.
you must be joking
I know who I know. Known them since we were children , ah the innocence of a child. As I said you can believe it or not. That's the nature of a blog.
I don't believe it
and you know why
PEACE!
cheap shot
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 09:58 PM by De La Valletta
reply to post by AK49er
SHARIAH LAW and the list goes on.
Has anyone also heard of the theory that this could be a NWO/ILLUMINATI ploy for WORLD WAR 3 between islamic east and christian west.
Put these two enemies , two incompatible , irreconcilable foes
in one cage , MULTICULTURALISM. Put so much cultural pressures
on them to ignite violence between them. Then the winner is to be
picked off or joined by the NWO.
SHARIAH LAW and the list goes on.
Has anyone also heard of the theory that this could be a NWO/ILLUMINATI ploy for WORLD WAR 3 between islamic east and christian west.
Put these two enemies , two incompatible , irreconcilable foes
in one cage , MULTICULTURALISM. Put so much cultural pressures
on them to ignite violence between them. Then the winner is to be
picked off or joined by the NWO.
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 10:13 PM by De La Valletta
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
I gave you peace in return for your anger. It was not meant to be a cheap shot , so you're welcome and sorry if you feel that way.
I gave you peace in return for your anger. It was not meant to be a cheap shot , so you're welcome and sorry if you feel that way.
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 10:24 PM by poet1b
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
I don't know what question you think has been answered, but you didn't blink an eye about the genocide currently being carried out in Africa, which speaks volumes.
Yeah, we are done.
I don't know what question you think has been answered, but you didn't blink an eye about the genocide currently being carried out in Africa, which speaks volumes.
Yeah, we are done.
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 10:25 PM by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by De La Valletta
still a cheap shot - even now
you have no understanding of my anger - no concept - you're only patronizing
also - you skipped out on answering my question
don't think that no one noticed - they did
still a cheap shot - even now
you have no understanding of my anger - no concept - you're only patronizing
also - you skipped out on answering my question
don't think that no one noticed - they did
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 11:03 PM by De La Valletta
reply to post by Spiramirabilis
He was very vocal about what he was and how he felt about the infidel at about 14 , I was on the receiving end of that. He was the younger of the 2 though , they are not related , Assef and him. He was always causing trouble in the neighbourhood with a couple of his friends the JAMAAT , kidnappings and the like they were responsible for the beheading of a businesswoman who couldn't/wouldn't pay the ransom. Last I heard he had left for Pakistan and was picked up by U.S troops about a year ago.
He was very vocal about what he was and how he felt about the infidel at about 14 , I was on the receiving end of that. He was the younger of the 2 though , they are not related , Assef and him. He was always causing trouble in the neighbourhood with a couple of his friends the JAMAAT , kidnappings and the like they were responsible for the beheading of a businesswoman who couldn't/wouldn't pay the ransom. Last I heard he had left for Pakistan and was picked up by U.S troops about a year ago.
reply posted on 13-10-2009 @ 11:07 PM by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by De La Valletta
there you go
and thank you
edit to add:
it's a crying shame - the whole damn thing - isn't it?
[edit on 10/13/2009 by Spiramirabilis]
there you go
and thank you
edit to add:
it's a crying shame - the whole damn thing - isn't it?
[edit on 10/13/2009 by Spiramirabilis]
reply posted on 14-10-2009 @ 07:03 AM by babloyi
reply to post by poet1b
Actually, you have posted NO links at all in this thread. Also, plenty of people on this thread are presenting evidence to the CONTRARY.
However, since "links" seem to be the ultimate form of proof in this thread (even though you provided none), here are some LINKS for you:
Since I have now provided LINKS!™, and you did not, do I win?
Ho ho ho! I thought you claimed you were not christian. Then why are you forcing (100 year old) christian sensibilities onto non-christians? "Days of past", ey? Thank you very much, but I like the freedom to wear my hat/head-gear/covering wherever I like, just like any other person.
Then that is the fault of the western world. A pitiful look at the inherent prejudice and intolerance present in parts of it.
But then what about the other stuff?! Men might "force" women to wear high-heels, better ban those too (in fact, there's better reason for that than headscarves, what with all the damage heels can do to your feet). Men might force women to read nothing but biographies and non-fiction! Ban them! EVERYTHING HAS A CAPABILITY OF BEING FORCED ON SOMEONE! Just to be safe, we should BAN EVERYTHING!
I find it hilarious that your reasoning for banning clothing items is that they might be "forced" on to someone. You do realise that with your advocating of a ban of hijab and burqa, you're doing the same thing? Forcing people to wear something against their will?
[edit on 14-10-2009 by babloyi]
Originally posted by poet1b
I am not making any assumptions, I am merely repeating what I have read and heard. Plenty of people here on the thread presenting the evidence. I have posted many links backing up what I am stating.
Actually, you have posted NO links at all in this thread. Also, plenty of people on this thread are presenting evidence to the CONTRARY.
However, since "links" seem to be the ultimate form of proof in this thread (even though you provided none), here are some LINKS for you:
Since I have now provided LINKS!™, and you did not, do I win?
Originally posted by poet1b
If people want to wear head gear outside to protect them from the weather, fine, but like in the days of the past, take it off when they go in doors. When it is hot outside, no, can't wear them.
Ho ho ho! I thought you claimed you were not christian. Then why are you forcing (100 year old) christian sensibilities onto non-christians? "Days of past", ey? Thank you very much, but I like the freedom to wear my hat/head-gear/covering wherever I like, just like any other person.
Originally posted by poet1b
No woman wearing a burqa will ever be taken seriously in the Western world.
Then that is the fault of the western world. A pitiful look at the inherent prejudice and intolerance present in parts of it.
Originally posted by poet1b
The clear reality is that by banning burqas and headscarves, no women can be forced to wear them. This is the purpose.
But then what about the other stuff?! Men might "force" women to wear high-heels, better ban those too (in fact, there's better reason for that than headscarves, what with all the damage heels can do to your feet). Men might force women to read nothing but biographies and non-fiction! Ban them! EVERYTHING HAS A CAPABILITY OF BEING FORCED ON SOMEONE! Just to be safe, we should BAN EVERYTHING!
I find it hilarious that your reasoning for banning clothing items is that they might be "forced" on to someone. You do realise that with your advocating of a ban of hijab and burqa, you're doing the same thing? Forcing people to wear something against their will?
[edit on 14-10-2009 by babloyi]
Who killed the prophet Muhammad? A 1400 year old murder mystery.
Posted 15 days ago with 16 member flags
Posted 15 days ago with 16 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Naked Man Eating Victim's Face Shot And Killed By Miami Police: Report
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 12 hours ago, 23 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 12 hours ago, 23 flags
Naked man killed by Police near MacArthur Causeway was 'eating' face off victim
Breaking Alternative News: 8 hours ago, 14 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 8 hours ago, 14 flags
Oakland City Council Cowers In The Face Of Brutal Truth
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 12 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 13 hours ago, 12 flags
Drones to the rescue ~ Repairing local economies in Ohio, coming to your State soon!
Aircraft Projects: 12 hours ago, 11 flags
Aircraft Projects: 12 hours ago, 11 flags
House to examine plan for United Nations to regulate the Internet
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 9 flags
Breaking Alternative News: 13 hours ago, 9 flags
Amazing video of 747 lifting in place in extreme wind conditions
Aircraft Projects: 14 hours ago, 8 flags
Aircraft Projects: 14 hours ago, 8 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Naked Man Eating Victim's Face Shot And Killed By Miami Police: Report
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 12 hours ago, 67 replies
Social Issues and Civil Unrest: 12 hours ago, 67 replies
Syria massacre in Houla condemned as outrage grows
Breaking Alternative News: 9 hours ago, 38 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 9 hours ago, 38 replies
Naked man killed by Police near MacArthur Causeway was 'eating' face off victim
Breaking Alternative News: 8 hours ago, 35 replies
Breaking Alternative News: 8 hours ago, 35 replies
House dismantled to free '700-pound' teenager
Medical Issues & Conspiracies: 16 hours ago, 32 replies
Medical Issues & Conspiracies: 16 hours ago, 32 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.253 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.253 seconds
