It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by poet1b
It started with this.
Men might "force" women to wear high-heels
Why would men force women to wear high-heeled shoes? To make them sex objects of course.
and ended with this.
Do you beat your wife if she goes around naked?
Now, to point out your semantics errors, I assumed you meant, "Do you beat your wife if she does not go around naked."
Originally posted by poet1b
Of course tie that to your signature, and your message is clear. You had to keep repeating the shoes topic, so I called you out and it worked beautifully.
Originally posted by poet1b
Yes, it is my opinion that the Burqa is a traveling prison, and a symbol of oppression, that is why I am putting this out there, so that people wake up. Putting your wife in a burqa and forcing your daughter to wear a head scarf everywhere is oppression, they are chains, in essence.
I think you see the burqa for what it really is. You support the burqa, because you support the control of women.
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by blupblup
And we get that you will make up any ridiculous excuse to pretend that Islam does not have some horrible practices.
If a christian priest molests a child, he goes to jail. It is illegal and not acceptable.
Your support of barbaric and archaic beliefs and customs makes you someone that I think should be forced to live in this world you defend, Iran, or Saudi Arabia, or perhaps Somalia. That is where you belong.
My beliefs rely completely on scripture.
Athiests and/or satanists try to use any trick in the book to turn people from the truth, from the Gospel of Jesus.
Think about that drive you have, where do you think it comes from? Why do you care how other people believe?
You want to save them, lol, from a man whose main message was LOVE? To love your neighbor as yourself?
You are simply a tool, a pawn, and don't even know it.
Originally posted by Symer
reply to post by TheBandit795
Finally, I disagree that Wilders should be ignored. His popularity demonstrates the existence of concern among the Dutch about a growing influx of Islamic followers and he provides them with a voice. Pretending those sentiments don't exist seems foolish to me.
Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by TSOM87
IMO he's lying. He'd rather see a whites only Netherlands.
Originally posted by TheBandit795
reply to post by TSOM87
IMO he's lying. He'd rather see a whites only Netherlands.