Hmm, after reading that article, and knowing that Yellowstone is such a volcano, then I really have to question the actions of seismologists (or
rather, the lack of) during the past recent swarm of earthquakes. That sukka could have literally blown according to this study.
While the differences in monitoring capabilities are considerable (seeing as Yellowstone has seismic stations all over the place, in addition to
deformation and water table data, and gas emissions), I still have to wonder if they indeed just got lucky and it didn't blow- when in reality- it
very well could have.
We discussed back and forth the potential of all of this to a stalemate. I even made a separate thread exploring the possibility they could be wrong.
Let's hope that due to fact that monitoring differences between that volcano and Yellowstone are considerable, that the scientists were more accurate
than lucky!
And keep this in mind should another swarm follow at Yellowstone anytime in the future.



