ET Disclosure, Predictions Webbots.., page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 28 times


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 10:55 AM by jinx880101
reply to post by Faiol



Originally posted by Faiol
talk about the average joe ... you are not much away from him

you just cannot create a thread about a prediction that is based on what people is saying ... that is just SICK!

webot predicts based on what it finds online, it doesnt have a power to know the future ...

yes, it can be effective in some areas, but, UFOs? aliens? really? try to understand how webbot works before creating a thread based on it


I don't believe this...
You where just on the other thread- David Wilcock: Full Disclosure and INTRODUCTION to ET by years end?

This thread is the same topic, about David Wilcocks radio show.
You were rude there and you are rude here too.
You should try and base an arguement in well mannerd way.

Saying people are sick for trying to get to the bottom of something really isn't going to get you anywhere.





reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 11:32 AM by InvisibleObserver
reply to post by Faiol





you just cannot create a thread about a prediction that is based on what people is saying ... that is just SICK! webot predicts based on what it finds online, it doesnt have a power to know the future ... yes, it can be effective in some areas, but, UFOs? aliens? really? try to understand how webbot works before creating a thread based on it


Read the link from the site that runs the program

halfpasthuman.com...


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 11:38 AM by Faiol
Originally posted by InvisibleObserver
reply to
post by Faiol





you just cannot create a thread about a prediction that is based on what people is saying ... that is just SICK! webot predicts based on what it finds online, it doesnt have a power to know the future ... yes, it can be effective in some areas, but, UFOs? aliens? really? try to understand how webbot works before creating a thread based on it


Read the link from the site that runs the program

halfpasthuman.com...


www.dailycommonsense.com...

its a computer search engine

since internet is a place where crazy people find other crazy people, its kind of logical that there will be a lot of crazy websites ... thats the tecnology behind it ... if you really believe a software that uses programmed functions could predict the future, sorry but, it doesnt work like that ... pre-programmed functions

What about 2012 (Read my article on 2012) and the Web Bots? As I said, I’m not seeing how a computer can figure out what’s going to happen in 2012 simply by visiting websites published by real people. The more data Web Bots get pointing towards 2012 just means more and more people are publishing stuff about 2012 and the end of the world. Remember, the only thing they can crawl is the internet and what you find on the internet was created by real persons, not God. They will surely get a strong correlation between 2012 and the end of the world; there’s ton of websites talking about it.


again! before creating a post based on webbot, please research, the first or second link in google explains everything ...

2012 stuff and alien stuff is $$$$$$$$$$$$$, thats why there are a lot of people talking about it!

so dont try to say that I am rude or whatever, I am just pointing what is wrong in your theory and that you say that the average joe doesnt research or cares about anything, but it looks like you are no different

[edit on 8-10-2009 by Faiol]

[edit on 8-10-2009 by Faiol]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 11:47 AM by OnTheFelt
reply to post by Faiol



Please provide a link to Ben Tremblay's qualifications, the author of "Daily Commonsense".

Unless he is some super duper govt official or renowned scientist, why is his opinion any more worthy than Cliff High.

You claim to deny ignorance, but yet perpetrate it even more.

Not saying, just saying.

[edit on 8-10-2009 by OnTheFelt]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 11:53 AM by Faiol
Originally posted by OnTheFelt
reply to
post by Faiol



Please provide a link to Ben Tremblay's qualifications, the author of "Daily Commonsense".

Unless he is some super duper govt official or renowned scientist, why is his opinion any more worthy than Cliff High.

You claim to deny ignorance, but yet perpetrate it even more.

Not saying, just saying.

[edit on 8-10-2009 by OnTheFelt]


MAN, you need serious help.

Please, explain to me how do u think webbot or google works.

He just explains how search engines work. They look for pages. The difference is that webbot look for some key words and dates. If a lot of people create websites about 2012, it will appear more and more in webot. Just like in google.

en.wikipedia.org...

Read this if you want to learn, otherwise, you can even search this board, for web bot and you will see a lot of people that study computers saying how it works.

[edit on 8-10-2009 by Faiol]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 12:29 PM by InvisibleObserver
reply to post by Faiol



I was a skeptic for maybe two years, but I kept following the reports that came out of each run just to see if this program really did work. It surprisingly gets more than just a few things right that it predicts and other times its a total miss, sometimes when it misses it still gets certain things in the same ball park. When they dont get it right that is due to the guys running it misinterpreting the data, that is reason after a event they get wrong they will come back and say sorry we misread the data or we thought it was this when it was actually that. Like I said I didn't believe this program worked but after following it for a few years and when they got the China quake mostly right, I was convinced they have something. Even tho they originally called for the quake in the states I believe it was, so many key events leading up to the quake they got right including a wedding that would be disrupted by the quake itself. If you don't want to cough up the $10 to get a report each run, you can find free reports at this link. The guy that runs the site also has a archives section under library going back the last ten years.

www.urbansurvival.com...


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 01:57 PM by BaronVonGodzilla
Originally posted by Echelon117
I was thinking the same thing. You don't come out and say something like this unless you REALLY know it was coming... You wouldn't just put your reputation on the line would you? I guess we will find out...


Here is my train of thought on the matter:

If he were full of #, he'd say this would happen in 2012 or something, give himself some real time to sell alot of new books before 2012 and take advantage of the mass panic that is building day by day.

But he said by the end of this year. And this is already October.

October, November, December.

So he didn't give himself enough time to even promote a book, much less write and publish one.

And he knows how important credibility is in this field.

If he is lying, he will be ridiculed and his career will be in serious ruins, much like Alex Jones. His credibility has recently become highly tarnished and I will be shocked if he ever regains his former status amongst people seeking truth.

SO, he gave himself 3 months. Under 3 months.

I guess we have no choice but to wait and see.. but...

I think he may mean it, and to me, though I have no graphs or data to back it up, it seems like UFO, alien, disclosure talk has really ramped up this year. many more sightings this year too. I myself have seen 3 questionable objects this year alone.

So maybe he means it. Maybe he is teling the truth.

Between now and Christmas. That is about 2 and a half more months.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 02:41 PM by ualredyknow
reply to post by Haydn_17



[color=Red]If so why the hell are Obama is bombing the moon? and please don't give me that lame sh** the search for h2o.[/color]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 02:42 PM by rickyrrr
reply to post by Echelon117



Even if He was right and the prediction was based on good sources, why would disclosure be done that way? we still haven't had the US government publicly acknowledge that they are "looking into UFOs" we have not had anybody come forward saying "we have artifacts" why jump straight to the personal introduction of an alien?

And in his account he also says that more than half the population will be gone. a few months is not enough time to dispose of 3 billion dead bodies. Just the logistics of it all don't make any sense.

-rrr
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Aliens Among Us ...Video
  Posted 10 days ago with 65 member flags
Moon: inexplicable phenomena. Luna Cognita video.
  Posted 18 days ago with 60 member flags
UFOs \'Escort\' Mexican Aircraft - Radar Confirmed.
  Posted 13 days ago with 31 member flags
The Aurora, Texas UFO Incident (1897)
  Posted 4 days ago with 27 member flags
Jacques Vallee: Implications of UFO Phenomena - Thinking Allowed.
  Posted 2 days ago with 22 member flags
UFO above Wadden Sea
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags