It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But was that Sarin originally from Iraq or was it brought in by fighters from outside of Iraq
Originally posted by Phoenix
I think this information is narrowing it down to two possibilities, 1. Iraq has WMD, 2. Iraq had WMD that was hidden in Syria.
There was originally an estimated 870 tons of Sarin.
Originally posted by marg6043
who is protecting or watching this borders?
Originally posted by marg6043
Now they found mustard gas too, Wait a moment I got the feeling that this may had been planted by this adminstration because bush is loosing popularity, so people will said (oh bush was right lets vote for him.) I am sorry but this is just to timely.
TextYeah, two weeks ago he said.
TexOBL will show up in October in US custodyt
Originally posted by robertfenix
It is all going according to plan, the Bush administration knows plenty about the WMD's that WERE in Iraq. They have an idea where they are in SXXXX and have an idea of how much is currently on the streets in Iraq......There will be no Iraq self rule for at least two to three years. The UN will be in Iraq by Mid 2005. Iraq will be under UN control for at least three years.
Originally posted by marg6043
I am confuse or just paranoid? how come the US convoy found this artillery but it explode before it had a target? and the best thing, how lucky for our troops it happend this way, and no body got gas and not casualty. I smell a rat.
Originally posted by marg6043
My question is, If USA is in charge of Iraq or as the muslin world say we are invadors are we responsible for the safety of this country? who is protecting or watching this borders?
[Edited on 17-5-2004 by marg6043]
Originally posted by John bull 1
How convenient.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Okay first off, this proves absolutely nothing. Nobody has said where this came from, it could have been frickin E-bayed to Syria for all we know.
You need METHODS OF DELIVERY and he had zero.
And, um, 2 people were injured? WOW, that is some MASS DESTRUCTION! Pfft.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Okay first off, this proves absolutely nothing. Nobody has said where this came from, it could have been frickin E-bayed to Syria for all we know. No "Made In Iraq" emblazoned on the shell. Some wacko might have had this in his basement for years.
And monkeys might fly out Saddam's butt. The shell is consistant with those Iraq had during the first gulf war and claimed to have destroyed AFTER that...
Secondly, the US invaded Iraq based on the fact that Saddam had WMD that he would use against the US. Proven to be a lie, by now, because even if Saddam HAD this one shell, is he going to load it into a giant slingshot and fire it across the ocean at the U.S.? You need METHODS OF DELIVERY and he had zero.
WMD's were NOT the ONLY reason Iraq was invaded. That is the lie the libs like to use to bash the administration. Lack of WMD's has NOT been proven to be a lie, as we are still on the hunt, and as jsobecky says, there is a lot of desert out there to search. It wasn't that Saddam could hit us with a shell or missle, it's that he could have given WMD's to terrorists such as Zarkawi (yeah, that's probably spelled wrong...live with it) who has been in Iraq for years under Saddam's protection, and would love nothing more than to smuggle it in and unleash it on American soil. There's your method of delivery.
To say that this justifies the illegal invasion of Iraq and the killing of thousands of civilians and hundreds of soldiers is ludicrous. This could have come from anywhere.
So why, praytell, is this an "illegal invasion"? Nobody has been able to tell me why. Congress approved it. The president did what congress approved. And the shell and it's contents could and most likely DID come from Iraq....