Theory: Could the web-bot "global coastal event" be caused by NASA bombing the moon?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 01:33 AM by Phage
reply to post by nikiano


No.
The prediction period has already passed. They blew it.
- Global Coastal Event likely in early to mid 2009
The Web Bot sees a permanent loss of low-lying territory globally and foresees that one continent in particular will get hit badly, but it does not say which one. Places to avoid: anything at sea level (Bangladesh/Florida/ etc).

www.december212012.com...


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 01:36 AM by nikiano
Originally posted by Phage
reply to
post by nikiano


No.
The prediction period has already passed. They blew it.
- Global Coastal Event likely in early to mid 2009
The Web Bot sees a permanent loss of low-lying territory globally and foresees that one continent in particular will get hit badly, but it does not say which one. Places to avoid: anything at sea level (Bangladesh/Florida/ etc).

www.december212012.com...


Actually, no, if you look at my correction, I went back to the original alta set, and it mentions 2010-2011 for the global coastal phenomenon.

I had originally thought it was 2009, but I was thinking of the earthquakes.

I can quote it if you like. (Can't copy it due to password protection.)

Interestingly, the alta set also mentions tidal changes....I just noticed that for the first time when I went back to check on the date.


[edit on 8-10-2009 by nikiano]

[edit on 8-10-2009 by nikiano]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 01:56 AM by Phage
reply to post by nikiano


Are you saying webbot did not predict a "global coastal event" for early to mid 2009?

December 16,2008
- Global Coastal Event likely in early to mid 2009
The Web Bot sees a permanent loss of low-lying territory globally and foresees that one continent in particular will get hit badly, but it does not say which one. Places to avoid: anything at sea level (Bangladesh/Florida/ etc).

forums.macrumors.com...

December 20, 2008
[WEB BOT]- Global Coastal Event likely in early to mid 2009
The Web Bot sees a permanent loss of low-lying territory globally and foresees that one continent in particular will get hit badly, but it does not say which one. Places to avoid: anything at sea level (Bangladesh/Florida/ etc). -Source_
www.december212012.com... ... 8_2009.htm

pimpinturtle.com...


November 30, 2008
- Global Coastal Event likely in early to mid 2009
The Web Bot sees a permanent loss of low-lying territory globally and foresees that one continent in particular will get hit badly, but it does not say which one. Places to avoid: anything at sea level (Bangladesh/Florida/ etc).

imaginativeworlds.com...


They missed.

[edit on 10/8/2009 by Phage]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 02:46 AM by Phage
reply to post by InvisibleObserver


The astronauts heard nothing. The vibrations were recorded by seismographs.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 02:51 AM by Echelon117
reply to post by funkeemunkee84



I had thought of that myself, but then isn't the impact point visible from earth?
If it is, then wouldn't the base or structures or what not have been visible through some high powered telescopes?

I think if there are in fact E.T bases on the moon, and I don't doubt it, they would be on the dark side of the moon.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 04:12 AM by spellbound
reply to post by Echelon117



So WHY are they doing it?

As a cover-up.

Also, how do you know what will happen in the aftermath? No-one does.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 04:28 AM by Echelon117
reply to post by spellbound



Of course I don't know what's going to happen... I don't know if the sun is going to explode tomorrow and kill us all either.

But logic tells me that it probably wont explode, and logic tells me that a 2-tonne piece of metal, using kinetic energy, not explosives, slamming into a planetary body the size of all of Australia, weighing 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 tonnes probably isn't going to do any structural damage to the Moon.

Craters are on the moon hundreds of kilometers across, indicating meteors of catastrophic size have hit it in the past right? Well we are still breathing.
The moon is hit by meteors all the time! This will be a pinprick on its surface.

So I'm saying that logic tells me nothing bad will happen.

[edit on 8-10-2009 by Echelon117]


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 04:33 AM by spellbound
reply to post by Echelon117



OK, hello Logic - and since you think I know nothing about Logic, I actually majored in Logic at University.

But this time my feelings are telling me more.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 04:46 AM by spellbound
reply to post by Echelon117



Yes, I do.

And we do not need bombing of the moon to cause major earthquakes - we have them right here.

I wish you were not so confrontational - sometimes it is nice to discuss things normally.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



The Strange Sounds, The Dogon, Sirius B and The Bullroarer.
  Posted 18 days ago with 63 member flags
The Mahdi does not negotiate. Neither should we
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
When Video Games Predict The Future.
  Posted 19 days ago with 8 member flags
HEADS UP! Prediction in "The Conspiracy Theory" movie: 4/23/12
  Posted 17 days ago with 8 member flags
Prophecies of Rasputin
  Posted 19 days ago with 7 member flags
Hopi-Tibetan Prophecy
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags
Sky sounds = "World Wide Sounding of Ram Horn"?
  Posted 9 days ago with 6 member flags