US 'silent on Israeli nuclear arms' , page 1

Double standards any one, or do we still have our heads under the sand. WAKE UP!

I personally believe the US should stop this none-sense not because they have to, but because they should care. They should care that certain policies of theirs causes more harm than good.

Barack Obama, the US president, has agreed to abide by a 40-year policy of allowing Israel to keep nuclear weapons without opening them to international inspection, according to a US newspaper.

In a report on Saturday, The Washington Times quoted three unnamed sources as saying Obama had confirmed to Binyamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister, that he would maintain the "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

english.aljazeera.net...



[edit on 7-10-2009 by oozyism]

reply to post by GhostR1der

---

You fail to realize M. Ahmadinejad wants to die a martyr. He doesn't care if Iran is decimated.

Israel has plenty of conventional bunker busters. No need for them to use nuclear weapons.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by oozyism

---

So you want to inspect them to disarm them.

Why would you disarm them, they have had them for many many years and they probably haven't been unwrapped yet.

[SNIP]

Good luck with your agenda.

Mod Edit: Removed off-topic part.

Civility and Decorum are Required

[edit on 8-10-2009 by Gemwolf]

(2) Alterations of a politicians name, or any other high-profile political personality, for disparaging political effect is not allowed, including within member avatars and signatures.

Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

Please adhere to this very simple directive

And stop the name calling

Semper

reply to post by oozyism

---

I guess the United States has a better connection with Israel than most people relise.Both countries intelligence services are very closely linked in a lot of different areas and services .Anyone want a job in Mossad.

[edit on 8-10-2009 by GORGANTHIUM]

reply to post by stevegmu

---

Hi Steve,

What happens when a bunker buster is used on a nuclear facility?

What gives any country (especially USA with ww2 in mind), the right to say who can and can't get nuclear weapons? They have no moral ground to stand on.

IMO we as a world should not use nuclear weapons or power with our shocking use and accident track record. Nuclear mistake means almost permanent damage to you and the environment, look at any fallout map and you'll see it goes almost everywhere eventually.
The country I live in (New Zealand) bans all nuclear weapons and reactors from its shores and seas due to the will of its people. Perhaps more countries could follow this example. We don't even have strike aircraft, instead we base our airforce around aid, humanitarian and fishing quota management. Perhaps more nations could throw down their arms, unite as the one people we are (in a non nwo way) and do something similar?

-gr

reply to post by Echelon117

---

If he wants to be serious about disarming the world of nukes then why not address any of the numrous countries who have nukes stockpiled?

Plenty of them to address, including our own, why start with Israel?

Also he doesn't want to stop Iran from enrichment activities. The world wants them not to enrich to the point they can have a nuke.

Virginia House Bill 1160: Nullify the NDAA
  Posted 14 days ago with 10 member flags

pro Israel or aginst them read this asap!
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags

The Solution
  Posted 3 days ago with 7 member flags

The President of the World... I think EVERY ATS member should see this.
  Posted 12 days ago with 6 member flags

2010 Hate Crime Statistics
  Posted 13 days ago with 2 member flags

Ron Paul\'s fans are building like legos
  Posted 13 days ago with 1 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: