It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NASA's LCROSS, false flag or forced disclosure?

page: 1
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 12:49 PM
link   
You probably all know about the LCROSS mission that is going to happen on friday.
The explanation for it, finding evidence of water, just doesn't sit right with me.

Could it be some of the NASA guys trying to force disclosure by trying to get a reaction to this mission, while letting the PTB think it's a scientific mission to find water?

Could this be a false flag operation, trying to provoke a reaction, saying we were just looking for water and now all of a sudden we are attacked? That kinda thing sounds to me worthy of a declaration of a national state of emergency, and we all know who calls the shots when that happends.

Ofcourse this is all speculation, but i don't buy the "water evidence" explanation.
Does anyone have some ideas about what is really going on?
I would like to hear your thoughts and theories on this.
This whole thing is making me a bit nervous.




posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 12:56 PM
link   
i don't think you have anything to worry about.

however i do think this test is somewhat pointless since India just discovered water on the moon.

also i love the logic, there might be water on the moon, "well lets blow it off the moon so we can see it" lol (i know its not all the water but still funny to me)



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by Alaskan Man
 


Well that's just it. Nasa concluded there was water there some time ago.
Inda did that last week.
Why this test then, seems a bit pointless. Unless ofcourse the water explanation is a front.
It just does not make any sense, then again goverments almost never make any sense to me.

[edit on 7/10/09 by locster]



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 01:16 PM
link   
reply to post by locster
 


I do not see what the big deal is. So we are going to blow a relatively small chunk off the moon. How is that going to hurt anything? I say go for it.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 01:22 PM
link   
reply to post by StinkyFeet
 


The big deal isn't about putting a hole in the moon, there are plenty of those, the big deal for me is their motivations.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 01:24 PM
link   
reply to post by locster
 


What do there motivations matter? What if they are just doing it because they can? It's not hurting anything.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 01:29 PM
link   
Trying to provoke a reaction from who exactly? Moon People?
They dont exist so i doubt it.
As you say your only speculating but there is definitly no cause to be getting nervous about.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 01:44 PM
link   
The best reason for NASAs motivation I can think of is this: Yes, NASA did themselves find water on the moon. Yes, India did also find water on the moon.
But in both cases this water was found as scattered tiny crystals on the surface.
What NASA is looking for this time is substantial amounts of ice below the surface.

The big question isn't "Is there water on the Moon?"
The big question is "How much water can we expect to find on the Moon, is it common?"

And the reason there are no explosive materials involved is of course that it would contaminate the readings of water, minerals etc.

To get back to the OP's question: NASA's LCROSS, false flag or forced disclosure?
I would have to say neither



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 01:55 PM
link   
LCROSS is an F.B.I. funded mission to kill Bin-Laden.

Apparently Bin-Laden transferred from a cave in Pakistan to a cave on the Moon with the help of the 33rd level Asian Masons.

He and several chums were dropped off on the Moon in 2004 by a sheduled Chinese shuttle to Mars that was sent to paint the face of cydonia red.

The group of 666 were deposited on September 11th, some to drill for helium-3, some from the RCH glass cleanining company to clean the 16 mile high glass structures, and some to make more cheese.

Bin-Laden landed at 19.5° W, 19.5° N, with enough supplies to last until 2012 of rice, pork and Jack Daniels.

The American F.B.I. are persuing Bin-Laden for various offences including genocide, implied terrorism and a parking fine from 1992.


R.I.P. Bin-Laden



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Jubjub
 


That's a very good explanation

I hope you are right and that we don't anger someone with it.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:03 PM
link   
Personally I do not think there is much to worry about if anything. The impact will be akin to a pinprick on the hide of a blue whale.

Purely for sake of discussion maybe there is something in Cabeus-A that needs destroying or perhaps the PTB are trying to make some sort of point to those that inhabit the moon, something along the lines of ‘the fruit is ready for picking’ (bad joke sorry).

I am not convinced about the theory that there are people on the moon but from reading “penetration” and others literature that theorises an inhabited moon I guess it could be a possibility. If that possibility is true - my neighbour slamming two large lumps on metal into my back yard at twice the speed of a bullet would be grounds for angrily banging on the door of that neighbour.

Fingers crossed that the moon is not inhabited and I hope that if it is, the "moonins" do not feel an urge to throw a clanger sized fit over it.

That said if the moon is inhabited and they do come a-calling we sure would have many answers as to the question of life out there. Fingers crossed that nothing happens in the context of extraterrestrial foot stamping and fingers crossed that the mission just finds detailed evidence of water-ice, hydrocarbons and hydrated materials.

I think it will be a damp squib and there will be no exciting developments for those outside the scientific field and even if there was they would not tell us anything more than – ‘Yup, found water’.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:10 PM
link   
Was the two other threads in as many days about this subject not enough?

MODS: Can we please merge these threads and lock any others that pop-up? This is ridiculous.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:11 PM
link   
reply to post by locster
 


When you are proven wrong on Friday, will you admit to being wrong?



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:17 PM
link   
Wow, I am surprised to see so many dismissive view points in this thread.

A few good answers have been provided, but let's face the facts here.

Is there really a point of plunging a satellite into the crater of the moon?

Why not just send more astronauts to see if there is more water? Why must we do things this way?

There are obviously simpler ways of going around this. NASA lies to us enough for us to know there is something going on.

Moon people? Maybe, it's not impossible. Those who say it is really need to think about what the word "truth" is, and how little of it you actually have experienced in your life.

~Keeper



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
Is there really a point of plunging a satellite into the crater of the moon?

Why not just send more astronauts to see if there is more water? Why must we do things this way?

There are obviously simpler ways of going around this.


Crashing a satellite into the moon is the simplier way of going about it. It is far more complicated to get astronauts to the moon with their equipment then back. The astronauts would not be able to move as much material in their very limited time on the moon as the LCROSS will.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 


That's understandable I suppose. Still it's a bit strange don't you think?

2nd...

~Keeper



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
That's understandable I suppose. Still it's a bit strange don't you think?


Did you find it strange when Japan did it? When India did it? When China did it?



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:27 PM
link   
reply to post by DoomsdayRex
 


I find it strange whenever NASA does anything to tell you the truth. Perhaps it's a biased point of view.

If all those other countries have done it, then why does NASA need to do it also?

~Keeper



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
If all those other countries have done it, then why does NASA need to do it also?


They did it for different reasons. But in every case they crashed a probe into the moon. And for some reason the fearful believers couldn't muster the outrage.



posted on Oct, 7 2009 @ 02:34 PM
link   
DoomsdayRex, sadly, the sun does not revolve around you, if you have a gripe, please u2u the appropriate people, don't post your bitching here.



new topics

top topics



 
6
<<   2 >>

log in

join