Mayan 2012 Date Corroborated by Ancient Egyptians, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 10:48 AM by Raider of Truth
reply to post by Scott Creighton



Awesome i'll checl this out when i get back from the Gym,
so S&F
looks interesting


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 03:18 PM by punkinworks
reply to post by Scott Creighton



sorry man but WHAAAAAT?


please explain how you come to this conclusion


one question scott,

what, in your opinion is "the first time" as referenced by the AE?


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 05:27 AM by Hanslune
reply to post by Aquarius1



Exactly, it was also a very uneven disaster, some classic cities were abandon, some outlying ones ran on for centuries while others slowly died. A very uneven collapse, more of an uneven demise punctuated by survivals.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 07:25 AM by Scott Creighton
reply to post by Julie Washington


Hi Julie,

JW: More description in layman's terms would be helpful.


I've put together another presentation in an attempt to illustrate what I am getting at here. I hope this makes more sense to you. At the end of the presentation (link below)there is also a small challenge if you - or anyone else here on ATS - would like to take up. 100 kudos points from me to the first person who manages to come within 100 years of the date presented (i.e. within 100 years of the answer I have).

Go on - have a go!! (Good luck).

Timeline - in Laymens Terms

Best wishes,

Scott Creighton

[edit on 8/10/2009 by Scott Creighton]



reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 09:13 AM by Scott Creighton
reply to post by Hanslune


Hello Hans,

A few questions here - I shall do my best to answer them:

Hans: 1. Why doesn't the Lehner line touch the circle? Why does it stop short?


SC: The 'Lehner Line' concerns itself ONLY with the physical structures. As can be seen from the presentation, this line has numerous structures connected to this line. It is unlikely that this is the result of simple happenstance and that this line represents something significant.

Hans: 2. Why does the Lehner line touch a different queen's pyramid that the one your circle is based on?


SC; Interestingly, the 'Lehner Line' actually connects the same star, rotated 90*, i.e. at min and max culminations. The circle, although closely connected with the Lehner Line, (timeline) has a different function to the timeline. The function of the circle is to present two intersection points beyond the timeline (points 1 and 4).

Hans: 3. Why has the date 10,500 now become 10,460?


SC: I have always written CIRCA 10,500BCE. If max culmination of the belt stars occurs c.2,500CE then 12,960 years back (i.e. half precession cycle) takes us to 10,460BCE. We now have a more accurate rate of precession which shows that the belt stars will culminate c.2,500 CE. We can work out the intersection date back the way from the more accurate 2,500 CE date. We also (as one would expect) get 2012 date.

4. What length of precession are you calculating for?


SC: The rate of precession is not - as I am sure you know - a precise science. The rate varies over time. A total of 12,960 years for the half-cycle is not an unreasonable average and is supported by a number of star-mapping programmes.

Hans: 5. Why is the date 3114 BC not involved? That would be a key date if your idea is correct. As would be the start of the Mayan cycle before it.


SC: I have merely demonstrated the fact that the Sphinx lines up with the midpoint of the 'Lehner Line' and show the date of this midpoint. (This could perhaps be indicating the true date of construction for the Sphinx, hence why the Sphinx is aligned to this midpoint). This midpoint in line with the Sphinx also helps confirm that the length of the timeline is delimited to the extent of the physical structures (as stated above) and not to the circle edge (albeit one of the structures - point 2 - on the 'Lehner Line' is ALSO on the circle's edge).

Hans: 6. Why do black lines go from the Sphinx Stelae to 'your' Queen pyramid's?


SC: There are only 2 points on the circle BEYOND the timeline - points 1 & 4. The Sphinx is the most natural and obvious 'calibration point' - the 'point of origin'. And there is also a clear connection between the Sphinx and the timeline. So why not the Sphinx and the other two points (1 & 4) on the circle? We need an 'anchor' point - the Sphinx is the most obvious candidate at the site.

Hans: 7. What, in meters, is the radius of your circle and the length of Lehners line?


SC: Haven't yet checked the 'Lehner Line' length but quite amazingly the radius of the circle is 1200 cubits (diameter=2400) cubits. The circumference of the circle is almost exactly 155520 inches which - if we divide 155520 by 12 = 12,960. Now before you claim the AE did not know the inch it might be worth reading this: The Gravity Cubit

Hope this helps answer some of your well thought out questions.

Regards,

Scott Creighton

[edit on 8/10/2009 by Scott Creighton]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 15 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 14 hours ago, 68 replies