Windows 7 Will Let Microsoft Track Your Every Move, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 8 times
Topic started on 7-10-2009 @ 09:06 AM by warrenb
From FireEagle to iPhone apps that use your current location, everyone it seems is racing to get on the geo-aware software bandwagon. So far most geo-aware features have been opt-in and offer reasonable privacy controls (FireEagle is a good example of this), but Microsoft’s upcoming Windows 7 plans to offer developers location tools at the operating system level and the company doesn’t seem to think users care about control or privacy.

Before you freak out at the thought that Redmond will soon be tracking your every move, keep in mind that the new features will be disabled by default. That’s the good news.

The bad news is that if you turn the geo features on, there are very few controls available and, yes, Microsoft could easily track your every move. Now you can freak out.

According to CNet, which saw a demo of the new geo features, once the service is turned on, there are only two means of limiting the geo-tracking — you can either limit to a specific user, or you can limit it to just traditional applications (rather than services running in the background).

But here’s the essential problem: If you enable the geo-tracking for say, a restaurant searching app in your gadgets collection, there’s no way to stop other apps from accessing your location as well. It’s an all or nothing feature.

While geo-aware locations are certain a hot item in the software world right now, they’re also at the heart of many ongoing privacy debates. Unfortunately Microsoft’s new feature is exactly the sort of thing that turns people’s mild suspicions into full, raging paranoia.

Here’s Microsoft’s explanation for why the geo-tracking will not offer much control. It’s also the paranoid’s greatest fear in a nutshell:
The reason, Microsoft officials say, is that Windows doesn’t have a reliable means of determining that an application is what it says it is, so any attempt to limit the location to a specific application would be easily spoofable.


So the short story is Windows 7 has geo-tracking features, but aside from turning them on and off, you have basically no control.

That strikes us as a recipe for disaster and something that will eventually blow up in Microsoft’s face (whether justified or not) because geo-tracking is a very sensitive issue and this implementation seems entirely ham-fisted and ill-conceived. Of course it’s a little better than past attempts by the company, which don’t even offer an on/off switch.

But why, for the love of all thing sane, would Microsoft not at least offer to notify you when an app is trying access geo-information? Indeed, that would be a good start. Then add the ability to deny the application access and you’re getting to the useful stage. Unfortunately, Microsoft reps tell CNet that such controls are “not currently on Microsoft’s roadmap for Windows 7.”
www.webmonkey.com...

I certainly will not be upgrading to windows 7, unless they can provide the tools to deny applications access to the geo location.

Pretty ridiculous that they didn't design some sort of solution.


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 09:31 AM by Haydn_17
Oh but they let students but it for £30, i wonder why...







reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 09:59 AM by mrmonsoon
reply to post by GhostR1der



Just for the record, GPU=Graphical Processing Unit.
This is the processor in your video card or in the "onboard" video section of the motherboard.

Unless, you are trying to run areo, it is not a overly big deal.

I ran vista on my laptop(came that way) until I moved to win 7.

I suspect you meant CPU=Computer Processing Unit, the main brains of the computer.

This is important, but, in my professional opinion, ram is a bigger issue.

Vista loves ram and uses large amounts of it.

Vista capable laptops with 512 ram are just that.

Capable of running Vista (not fast at all) but not necessarily other programs.

Personally, I would recommend 4 gigs of ram with Vista and win 7 for that matter, even though win 7 is a much lighter load.


reply posted on 7-10-2009 @ 10:47 AM by GhostR1der
reply to post by mrmonsoon



Dargh!!!! Gesture browsing killed my original reply and I'm currently one handed after a tendon inury so i'll keep this brief.

I was referring to on board 'gpu' (northbridge+cpu) as you stated, pretty much intel and microsoft pulled the wool with 'vista ready' and the not so ready large 915/945gm etc 'extreme graphics' families of laptops and desktops. Aero is a feature I'd be expecting to use on my fancy new laptop if it had vista. People are pissed because they can't.


news.cnet.com...



"The '915' chipset which is not Aero capable is in a huge number of laptops and was tagged as 'Vista Capable' but not Vista Premium. I don't know if this was a good call. But these function but will never be great. Even a 945 set has new builds of drivers coming out constantly but hopes are on the next chipset rather than this one."


gizmodo.com...



They are unable to use the Aero interface or to access a number of premium features such as the Desktop Window Manager, live thumbnails, “transparency” or 3D graphics.


www.crunchgear.com...



Bit OT sorry op... but another thing I'd like to point out:

A little trip back through history

Win 98 | win98se (98-98se keys are exchangeable though)
Win me | win xp
vista | win 7


What's in common? Everything on the left sucked, was largely spat at (moreso than usual for a microsoft product) and was replaced quickly by the right version, which had longer support and more development.
Fooled ya once, fooled ya twice, fooled ya thrice!
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^




Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 16 hours ago, 114 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 12 hours ago, 98 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 10 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 14 hours ago, 50 replies