2 People Arrested For Texting G20 Protesters Police Locations, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times
Topic started on 6-10-2009 @ 07:57 PM by harpsounds

2 People Arrested For Texting G20 Protesters Police Locations


www.youtube.com
According to this CNN story, 2 people were arrested for twittering/texting protesters at G20 in Pittsburg.
(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.democraticunderground.com


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:11 PM by Laurauk
reply to post by stevegmu



Why would you deny it is?

You only have to look at whom will be attending this meeting not to realise that the NWO are at work here.

They are trying to control everybody. And stop those, whom know what they are up to, from confronting them.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:17 PM by stevegmu
reply to post by Laurauk



There's no such thing as a New World Order Movement, anymore than the world is going to end in 2012. I believe people with a bad lot in life simply need to believe all of their problems are cause by others, so believe in the NWO conspiracy.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:20 PM by Laurauk
reply to post by stevegmu



Just as there is no Secret societies either right!!

Let them continue pulling the wool over your eyes.

You just continue to obey those, whom try and control your every day life.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:23 PM by Archon_Adept
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to
post by Laurauk


I believe people with a bad lot in life simply need to believe all of their problems are cause by others, so believe in the NWO conspiracy.


lol, what? There's no NWO, but you admit that there's a g20 who's simple meeting causes basic human rights to be curbed? You do realize that gordon brown (he's part of the g20) called for a new world order, don't you?



You're a hoot!


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:23 PM by harpsounds
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to
post by Laurauk



There's no such thing as a New World Order Movement, anymore than the world is going to end in 2012. I believe people with a bad lot in life simply need to believe all of their problems are cause by others, so believe in the NWO conspiracy.


Well, I don't think it's possible to say there isn't a NWO movement, you can't really falsify a claim like that.

I personally don't believe in NWO as some grand freemason conspiracy or anything like that, I just think of it as all the people in positions of power, like Corporations, Politicians, etc, all trying to increase their own power and wealth by any means necessary, the same way power elites have acted for thousands of years. Some may collude, others may not, but what they all have in common is their disdain for the regular populace, and their desire to end up on top no matter who they hurt.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:33 PM by StinkyFeet
reply to post by clay2 baraka



I am not a lawyer but my guess is that texting/twittering police positions could be construed as interferring in official police business.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:35 PM by stevegmu
reply to post by Archon_Adept



By NWO I mean the way it is portrayed here- as a clandestine organization of world leaders hell-bent on control and domination, all of whom are puppets of corporations. That's just nonsense.

I don't know where you are from, maybe Greece?, but rioting and destruction of property is not a basic human right.



reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:49 PM by clay2 baraka
Originally posted by StinkyFeet
reply to
post by clay2 baraka



I am not a lawyer but my guess is that texting/twittering police positions could be construed as interferring in official police business.


It is passive interference at worst.

I wonder if there is precedence for this. If I tell my neighbor that there are police cars down the street, can that same logic be stretched to be used for my arrest?

How would this law (if there is one), apply to journalists?

This seems like a slippery slope to be heading down in my opinion. .


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 08:52 PM by StinkyFeet
reply to post by clay2 baraka



Well if your neighbor is rioting and throwing rocks and bottles at the police and then you call to warn or tell him where they are at then you will probably be arrested too, as you should be.

[edit on 6-10-2009 by StinkyFeet]


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 09:14 PM by miss_silver
Originally posted by stevegmu
reply to
post by Laurauk



There's no such thing as a New World Order Movement



Think again.





SO out of curiosity, how did the police manages to pin down those texters? Got a slow dial up connection and you tube, these days is simply incredibly to watch videos on that are more than a few mins.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 09:26 PM by stevegmu
reply to post by miss_silver



When President Bush referred to the new world order, he was speaking about the Gulf War, after the US and coalition forces had annihilated Iraqi armour and sent the Iraqis running back to their hole. That has nothing to do with the alleged NWO.


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 09:29 PM by clay2 baraka
Originally posted by StinkyFeet
reply to
post by clay2 baraka



Well if your neighbor is rioting and throwing rocks and bottles at the police and then you call to warn or tell him where they are at then you will probably be arrested too, as you should be.

[edit on 6-10-2009 by StinkyFeet]


I am pretty sure you are wrong.
This is a very similar case to this one:

NPR's Robert Siegel talks with Harlie "Bill" Walker, from Franklin, Tenn. Mr. Walker flashed his car headlights at other motorists this past August to warn of a speed trap ahead. The city said Walker had violated an ordinance, and fined him $10 plus court costs. He and a town attorney appealed to the circuit court, where Judge Russ Heldman cleared Walker of all charges, saying that flashing lights to warn of a police officer is protected by the First Amendment.

www.npr.org...

I would not be surprised if this gets thrown out of court.

More information here:
www.riehlworldview.com...

[edit on 10/6/2009 by clay2 baraka]


reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 09:31 PM by stevegmu
reply to post by mr-lizard



There's really no difference. The unwashed at the G20 were calling themselves anarchists. Perhaps the black flags with an A in a circle they were carrying were actually CGI the nasty media superimposed.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags