posted on Oct, 6 2009 @ 06:46 PM
COULD it be that instead of a false flag blaming Iran, the false flag set-up will point the mighty finger of blame at PAKISTANI TERROR?
Hear me: A nuke (or other strike) hits Washington DC (or other city) and we are told by the MSM that the evidence is certain - it's from a terror
group working out of Pakistan (possibly running the show there we are told). The nuke threat is certain. They already have them.
So, we get to attack Pakistan all out. Thus, we expand the Afghan war. We get our bases prepared all over Iraq, Afghanistan AND Pakistan BEFORE we
hit Iran later.
Meanwhile, we've continued our happy inspection of Iran UNTIL something goes wrong and we have no choice but to attack there (not wanting a repeat of
the Paki-strike we suffered through in Oct.-Nov. '09)
Could THAT plan work?
We link and think....
I'm sure there's lots more to read and reports to hear through the past years of preparation.
Iran is a given. Israel wants Iran hit. But how can we if they allow inspectors and the public isn't buying the 'Saddam-has-WMDs' style excuses
Since Iran can't come up with a nuclear strike and is trying to show no threat, then a Pakistan nuke going off from terrorists we are convinced have
gained access to their nuclear facilities would leave us no option but to expand the fight and attack them on a much broader scale than a few drones
on the border.
Just another possibility to consider....
[edit on 6-10-2009 by Whatthehell?]