Your pictures!, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 12:38 PM by Schmidt1989
reply to post by ngchunter



Thats awesome!

Even without a telescope, I think I am going to buy a remote trigger for my Olympus evolt e500. I can go up to 60 minutes exposure on the bulb setting, but it's just too hard to hold the cameras button down for that long, especially without moving.


reply posted on 8-10-2009 @ 02:57 PM by Schmidt1989
reply to post by whiteblack



Thanks, but it was a typo. Believe me. At least you pointed it out to me, thanks.



reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 07:47 AM by ngchunter
Originally posted by TheAmused
i want to know the type of telescope's yall use.

Here's the current equivalent model to the telescope I use, though mine is an earlier version made prior to the GPS and ACF versions:
www.optcorp.com...

i want to see jupiter..lol
actually i want to see the moon to like that one also.

If you want to see Jupiter and the moon any decent beginner scope will show you both, but not all beginner telescopes are well-made or easy to operate, and most telescopes will not show these objects in quite as much detail. "Lucky imaging" is used to pull out details even the human eye can't pick up. Here's a clip of the raw video used to make the image of Jupiter seen above:
www.ustream.tv...
That's what you can basically expect to see by eye, and you'll start to see a little more detail than that once you've trained your eye. Also, here's some raw video of the moon shot with the same camera that made the moon mosaic above:
www.youtube.com...
Again, this is a good representation of what you can expect to see by eye. Astrophotography is required to reveal more detail, and a good telescope with tracking motors is required for astrophotography.

But i got no idea what to go buy.
do i buy that cheapO at walmart ?

Noooo, avoid the cheap stuff like the plague. It'll only lead to frustration. Binoculars are more enjoyable if you're on a tight budget.

and cheapest one i can go buy that i can see jupiter with?

This is the absolute cheapest telescope I would ever consider buying:
www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=reflectors/~pcategory=telescopes/~product_id=09541
*sorry, ats eats the link

If at all possible though, I would recommend no less than this telescope:
www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=reflectors/~pcategory=telescopes/~product_id=08942
*sorry, ats eats the link
The second one is similar to a telescope I had and used for years with great enjoyment.

Oh can i buy a telescope i can see the ISS with?

I've seen guys track ISS by hand and use video cameras to record it with telescopes like the last one I linked to, but I've never been any good at the hand tracking method, and if you want to see it visually in the eyepiece you'll need the telescope to automate the tracking for you. That's really advanced stuff and requires a telescope basically no less capable than the first one I linked to which is like mine. You could probably do it just as successfully with an LX90 like this, but the computerized tracking is a must in order to really "see" it:
www.optcorp.com...

all great pic's guys

Thanks!

[edit on 19-11-2009 by ngchunter]


reply posted on 19-11-2009 @ 12:51 PM by gareth01422
Originally posted by ngchunter
Originally posted by gareth01422
That is just bsolutlly stunning. I havnt a clue what or where it is, but the picture is amazing.

Please can you tell us how you took these pictures?

Thanks! It is the Orion Nebula, also known as M42, located right in Orion's sword in the constellation Orion. I used a Canon XTi dSLR attached directly to an 8" LX200 Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope (no lenses or eyepieces in between the two). I attached a second smaller LPI camera, which is basically a glorified webcam designed for astronomy, directly to the telescope's viewfinder so that my laptop could monitor a nearby star and send guiding commands to the telescope to keep the image perfectly still. I took a series of 30 second exposures and a series of 5 minute exposures and averaged them together in two groups for each image in the mosaic (upper and lower) for a total of 4 stacked images. Then I used a free program called Qtpfsgui to take the 30 second and 5 minute image stacks and create an HDR image where both the very bright center of the nebula and the very dim outer limits are properly shown without over or under exposure. Finally, I layered the HDR images back over the original 5 minute stacks to make it more natural and then stitched the upper and lower images together with another free program called Autostitch.


If i believed there was a heaven I thing it look something like your picture.

I have also messed around with HDR's too

here are 3 I did last year. Ok so they are not space but hey still HDR.

i247.photobucket.com...

i247.photobucket.com...

i247.photobucket.com...

Gareth
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags