Originally posted by mellisamouse
I just watched a vidoe yesterday, I can't find it in all my wayyy too many facebook links, but it was basically, red dots, taken out and shot in the
head right away, blue dots taken immediatly to imprisenment camps and killed once they get there,
Whoever started this obviously has some fear of large organisations and has never actually worked for one. This makes no sense at all. The problem
with scenarios such as these is that people who promote them (or start the rumours) really have a poor grasp of logistics. Whilst a lot of the NWO
worries are scalable or doable at the moment, particularly when it comes to the IT side of things.
However, the real grunt work, such as these 'dot system for rounding people up' schemes have to be done the hard way. This will entail lots of
people, weapons and transportation. This is an incredible resource sponge and, unlike films where the villains live in volcanoes that open up to
reveal giant secret cities, resources aren't infinite.
So, as with all organisations in the real world - and even the Nazi gas chambers and the like came about from 'logistic solutions' with regards to
killing Jews more 'efficiently' - they, whomever they are, will need a way to cut corners on costs and manpower. This is where part of the plan
behind the colour coding scheme doesn't even make sense. Shot in the head right away seems plausible enough but it leaves a lot of dead bodies in
strange places: lots of (once) private homes. Those bodies can't stay there as what's the point in ruling a land that's plague ridden due to 100s
of 1000s of bodies lying around. All these body-infested homes could be torched but this would mean fire management - which is very resource heavy -
and not very efficient, particularly if this is happening across large cities.
Where this conspiracy gets even more clumsy is with the second category. Those that are taken to some kind of internment camp and killed once they get
there. Why? What's the point in this? Yes, it appears to echo the reality of a Nazi death system but it actually doesn't. The Nazis were, in many
ways, trying to keep a lot of their camps a semi-secret which meant removal and rounding up relative minorities and getting rid of them away from the
general populace. It's worth pointing out that much of these people were already separated from the general populace to an extent too: ghettos,
prisons, hospitals and the like. The scenario you're presenting here isn't really that
similar. Rather than a relative minority, this colour
dot scheme appears to be part of a plan to get rid of incredibly large amounts of people, not relative minorities as with the Nazis. Why remove them
from the rest of the population? Particularly after large numbers of 'red dot people' have been executed in their own homes to start with. Why
organise a transport system to remove these people only to kill them the minute they reach their destination? Why not kill them in the same way as the
'red dot people'? What's to be gained by killing these people in a much more resource hungry way?
and pink dots, after all the chaos and mess is cleaned up from the first two groups, thses sheep will be taken then for re-education at the
[edit on 7-10-2009 by mellisamouse]
I'm not entirely sure this makes sense. Smaller numbers are easier to control, true, but given the complete and utter removal of red dots and blue
dots you only have pink dots left. Would it really be necessary to again use a resource hungry transportation and camp system for re-education
purposes? I'm fairly sure that a large percentage of these pink dot survivors would have learned practically all the lessons they'd need teaching at
Just to clarify, I realise that it's not something you've posited, and it's not aimed at you personally.