Reps. Brian Baird, D-Wash., and Greg Walden, R-Ore., are circulating a petition among House lawmakers to get Congress to post bills online, for all to
see, 72 hours before lawmakers vote on them.
Nearly every Republican has signed on for the “72 hour rule,”
but the Democratic leadership is unwilling to cede control over when bills
are brought to the floor for votes and are discouraging their rank and file from signing the petition.
Senate Democrats voted down a similar
measure last week for the health care bill.
www.washingtonexaminer.com...
Hey, I don't make this stuff up! Here's the url:
www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/Congressional-leaders-fight-against-posting-bills-online-8340658-63557217.html
They did this with the Stimulus, Cap and Trade, and Energy and bailout bills, too!
Even Obama ignores his Executive Order to post all
legislation for 5 days before he signs it.
As Congress lurches closer to a decision on an enormous overhaul of the American health care system, pressure is mounting on legislative leaders
to make the final bill available online for citizens to read before a vote.
Lawmakers were given just hours to examine the $789 billion stimulus plan, sweeping climate-change legislation and a $700 billion bailout package
before final votes.
While most Americans normally ignore parliamentary detail, with health care looming, voters are suddenly paying attention. The Senate is expected to
vote on a health bill in the weeks to come, representing months of work and stretching to hundreds of pages. And as of now, there is no assurance that
members of the public, or even the senators themselves, will be given the chance to read the legislation before a vote.
www.washingtonexaminer.com...
www.drudgereport.com...
What EVER happened to transparency? Hope? Change?
If all this stuff is so good for us, why don't they want us to see it?
Very simple question.
Very serious answer:
Deny ignorance!
jw
[edit on 6-10-2009 by jdub297]