Here is the exif file minus my name and camera serial number.
The aperature should be close to F6 since the camera aperature is wide open.
Make - Canon
Model - Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Orientation - Top left
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
DateTime - 2009:09:03 21:47:53
YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited
ExifOffset - 196
ExposureTime - 1/200 seconds
FNumber - 0
ExposureProgram - Manual control
ISOSpeedRatings - 100
ExifVersion - 0221
DateTimeOriginal - 2009:09:03 21:47:53
DateTimeDigitized - 2009:09:03 21:47:53
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
ShutterSpeedValue - 1/200 seconds
ApertureValue - F 0.00
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MeteringMode - Multi-segment
Flash - Flash not fired, compulsory flash mode
FocalLength - 0 mm
UserComment -
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - sRGB
ExifImageWidth - 3456
ExifImageHeight - 2304
InteroperabilityOffset - 9230
FocalPlaneXResolution - 3954.23
FocalPlaneYResolution - 3958.76
FocalPlaneResolutionUnit - Inch
CustomRendered - Normal process
ExposureMode - Manual
White Balance - Manual
SceneCaptureType - Standard
Maker Note (Vendor): -
Macro mode - Normal
Self timer - Off
Quality - Fine
Flash mode - Not fired
Sequence mode - Single or Timer
Focus mode - MF
Image size - Large
Easy shooting mode - Manual
Digital zoom - None
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
ISO Value - 32767
Metering mode - Evaluative
Focus type - Auto
AF point selected -
Exposure mode - Manual
Focal length - 0 - 0 mm (1 mm)
Flash activity - Not fired
Flash details -
Focus mode 2 - 8
White Balance - Sunny
Sequence number - 0
Flash bias - 0 EV
Subject Distance - 0
Image Type - Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT
Firmware Version - Firmware 1.0.3
Owner Name -
Camera Serial Number -
Sharpness (0D) - 0
File number - 253 - 5342
Sharpness (A0) - 0
Thumbnail: -
Compression - 6 (JPG)
XResolution - 72
YResolution - 72
ResolutionUnit - Inch
JpegIFOffset - 9716
JpegIFByteCount - 2723
Mob
My latest Moon Image, page 2
privacy
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:34 PM by marsorbust
reply to post by barrelmaker
Oh I have some images of deep space objects, but you really want to get higher quality for those. Mine are respectable but only taken withe 8 inch scopes or less. I have m42 fairly decent, but if you are after size and quality the hubble is king of the hill.
Mob
Oh I have some images of deep space objects, but you really want to get higher quality for those. Mine are respectable but only taken withe 8 inch scopes or less. I have m42 fairly decent, but if you are after size and quality the hubble is king of the hill.
Mob
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 04:43 PM by marsorbust
reply to post by ngchunter
Just a single image out of about 16 candidates.
Was great conditions though, rare for here, none of that edgy blurs you usually pickup from the atmosphere.
The moon was extremely bright and quite beautiful to gaze at, but I cut it short due to it being a bit cold.
I can't get a look at yours, the link is timing out on me.
Would like to see it very much.
Regards,
mob
Just a single image out of about 16 candidates.
Was great conditions though, rare for here, none of that edgy blurs you usually pickup from the atmosphere.
The moon was extremely bright and quite beautiful to gaze at, but I cut it short due to it being a bit cold.
I can't get a look at yours, the link is timing out on me.
Would like to see it very much.
Regards,
mob
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 05:17 PM by marsorbust
reply to post by captiva
The reason they don't show is the camera is in manual mode. The lens is an eight inch newtonian telescope at F6.
Hope that helps.
Mob
The reason they don't show is the camera is in manual mode. The lens is an eight inch newtonian telescope at F6.
Hope that helps.
Mob
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 05:28 PM by marsorbust
reply to post by Moraz
Advice on telescopes...can be tricky....most important part of the telescope is the mount.
I would put my money into a good quality mount, then get any telescope within reason to go on the mount.
Best buy for the buck is a newtonian on a dob mount but would need a lot of bucks later when you want to go for deep sky imaging.
Your options are much better than mine were for cameras now. Dslr's are very nice as long as you can get full manual control.
My dslr was $1200 when I bought that was a few years back, I think they have come done in price some since.
Dedicated astronomy cameras start out around $500 and up, they do very well, but you can't take a portrait of the family with them easily!
Best thing to do is find an astronomy club close to you and look at and through the various types the members use. Most don't mind helping you in deciding whats best for your budget.
Hope this was helpful.
Mob
Edit: correct spelling
[edit on 6/10/09 by marsorbust]
Advice on telescopes...can be tricky....most important part of the telescope is the mount.
I would put my money into a good quality mount, then get any telescope within reason to go on the mount.
Best buy for the buck is a newtonian on a dob mount but would need a lot of bucks later when you want to go for deep sky imaging.
Your options are much better than mine were for cameras now. Dslr's are very nice as long as you can get full manual control.
My dslr was $1200 when I bought that was a few years back, I think they have come done in price some since.
Dedicated astronomy cameras start out around $500 and up, they do very well, but you can't take a portrait of the family with them easily!
Best thing to do is find an astronomy club close to you and look at and through the various types the members use. Most don't mind helping you in deciding whats best for your budget.
Hope this was helpful.
Mob
Edit: correct spelling
[edit on 6/10/09 by marsorbust]
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 07:21 PM by ngchunter
Originally posted by marsorbust
I can't get a look at yours, the link is timing out on me.
Would like to see it very much.
Regards,
mob
That's odd, I'm not sure why it's timing out. Here's the link to the full flickr page for that image:
www.flickr.com...
In case that doesn't work, here's a similar image I took of the moon almost two years ago and only recently got around to stacking:
The only adjustment made after stacking was noise filtering in Neat Image and cropping.
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 07:26 PM by Alaskan Man
Originally posted by marsorbust
reply to post by Alaskan Man
Greetings Alaska Man,
Maybe you didn't right click it, if you right click it you will see an option for download, its bigger than my desktop which is 1280 X 800, its approx 1700 X 1700. Does that help?
Mob
i indeed did, but at the time you only had a small photo posted, your since then edited it and posted a larger one.
thank you for posting the larger one
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 07:31 PM by ngchunter
reply to post by KURDAN
300-500 could be difficult. Very few telescopes in the lower part of that price range are worth anything at all. Here's one for 280 that's a good starter scope, but you won't be able to take any pictures with it:
www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=HP_ProductZone3/~pcategory=HOMEPAGE/~product_id=09964
With a 6" scope you can see a fair amount of detail in the orion nebula and with practice in star hopping and averted vision spot plenty of faint fuzzy galaxies that don't show any real detail other than general shape.
[edit on 6-10-2009 by ngchunter]
300-500 could be difficult. Very few telescopes in the lower part of that price range are worth anything at all. Here's one for 280 that's a good starter scope, but you won't be able to take any pictures with it:
www.telescope.com/control/product/~category_id=HP_ProductZone3/~pcategory=HOMEPAGE/~product_id=09964
With a 6" scope you can see a fair amount of detail in the orion nebula and with practice in star hopping and averted vision spot plenty of faint fuzzy galaxies that don't show any real detail other than general shape.
[edit on 6-10-2009 by ngchunter]
reply posted on 6-10-2009 @ 07:32 PM by jra
reply to post by TiM3LoRd
There are many pictures taken of the far side. You can download Google Earth as it also has the Moon in it now. (you can also view it here) There are many photos taken by the various probes that have orbited the Moon. There are even HD videos of the far side taken by JAXA's Kaguya orbiter. (link).
There are many pictures taken of the far side. You can download Google Earth as it also has the Moon in it now. (you can also view it here) There are many photos taken by the various probes that have orbited the Moon. There are even HD videos of the far side taken by JAXA's Kaguya orbiter. (link).
Mysterious Signal From Outer Space - Is Someone Trying To Contact Us?
Posted 13 days ago with 29 member flags
Posted 13 days ago with 29 member flags
Newest topics, updated in real-time:
I'm 24 and I feel Doomed- A rare Case - 28 reported Worldwide
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 1 hours ago
Medical Issues & Conspiracies, Posted 1 hours ago
Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:
Just got through watching "Casino Jack and The United States of Money"...Then I threw up
US Political Madness, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 flags
US Political Madness, Posted 16 hours ago, 50 flags
Brainwashed Cops Shoot Unarmed Woman Motorist To Death For Rolling Up Her Car Window
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 9 hours ago, 48 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 9 hours ago, 48 flags
Thomas Jefferson, A man of the past who may have seen the future
US Political Madness, Posted 14 hours ago, 27 flags
US Political Madness, Posted 14 hours ago, 27 flags
***Programming The Nation FULL Video- Limited Time Only!!***
Education and Media, Posted 8 hours ago, 21 flags
Education and Media, Posted 8 hours ago, 21 flags
Cop allegedly pulled gun on pregnant woman over too many grocery items in checkout
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 14 hours ago, 19 flags
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 14 hours ago, 19 flags
Greek Doctors Battle Hospital Superbug as Crisis Depletes Budget
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 17 flags
Breaking Alternative News, Posted 17 hours ago, 17 flags
Scientists Warn Supervolcano Will Destroy U.S Much Sooner Than You Think
Fragile Earth, Posted 12 hours ago, 16 flags
Fragile Earth, Posted 12 hours ago, 16 flags
Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:
Brainwashed Cops Shoot Unarmed Woman Motorist To Death For Rolling Up Her Car Window
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 9 hours ago, 100 replies
Social Issues and Civil Unrest, Posted 9 hours ago, 100 replies
U.S. Navy: Iran prepares suicide bomb boats in Gulf
Middle East Issues, Posted 10 hours ago, 94 replies
Middle East Issues, Posted 10 hours ago, 94 replies
Hollow Earth Theory Using Cold Fusion as evidence of the possiblity.
General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 75 replies
General Conspiracies, Posted 13 hours ago, 75 replies
The Illuminati and the Free Masons and their TRUE relationship
Secret Societies, Posted 15 hours ago, 67 replies
Secret Societies, Posted 15 hours ago, 67 replies
The most abused word in the English language?
Deconstructing Disinformation, Posted 17 hours ago, 65 replies
Deconstructing Disinformation, Posted 17 hours ago, 65 replies
Scientists Warn Supervolcano Will Destroy U.S Much Sooner Than You Think
Fragile Earth, Posted 12 hours ago, 61 replies
Fragile Earth, Posted 12 hours ago, 61 replies
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.140 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.140 seconds
