reply to post by OzWeatherman
Ok bobby, very funny....so where's the real research and the data you have collected over the 3 or so years you claim to have been doing this?
I guess what you are saying is that accredited scientists should discuss these issues and no one else, that common sense plays no role in deciding
which direction science should choose to focus its limited resources.
The academic rigors needed to become a scientist requires that the mind be closed to anything but purely objective reasoning. I understand the value
of doing this but then who is supposed to decide what scientists do research on if they do not know how to look for answers as to what might be the
cause of an effect if they are trained not to look outside the box. We all know the answer to that, the politicians and corporations that fund their
work, that’s who decides what grants to give and what perimeters to stay between in the research. This yields only information that the rich and
powerful want discovered.
There is a strict social protocol that has to be followed by anyone who hopes to be successful in an academic based career. It requires a separation
of unskilled working class people from those with higher education. This is done by giving people who sit in classrooms and work in labs the
impression that they are making great sacrifices to achieve their degrees while other less ambitious people work for a living. This isolates academics
under the wing of the people who pay their bills who have to control them in order to fulfill their agendas.
You arrogance is a prime example of how this works and acts as a very good way to explain to the rest of this threads followers how this works. You
don't just fail to see the value in a non scientist presenting an original unimpeded theory TO science for them to possibly be inspired by it. I mean
do you think that science could progress better if there were more people like me, if every trash hauler or ditch digger was encouraged to come up
with theories and take them as far as is possible with their limited resources and abilities in the hopes that it can be judged as have further merit
by real scientific evaluation?
Your responses to my works only seem to point out that I not living up to a very high academic standard, which I don’t claim to be. You rather claim
I am a complete moron for even trying to be in the same discussion as you. This in spite of the fact I have beaten you outright on every topic I have
answered demonstrating clearly my methods are superior to yours, that is with my fourth grade education, which I also have a GED and one year of
college. I was in college when I was 16 after getting thrown out of high school for starting a race riot and shutting down the school. So I got a
waiver so I could get a GED because the school didn’t want to take me back. I got the GED in a few months, was enrolled in college just before I
turned 17, and was getting some of the best engineering grades in my classes when I broke my leg in a motorcycle accident.
The doctor then set the bone wrong so I walked with a limp. I got a job so I would get paid for it, rebroke the leg myself, reset it perfectly myself.
When my parents got a divorce just after I got out of bed, this was after spending my second 16 week session on my back healing, I moved into an
abandoned house so I could care for my leg while making sure I didn’t break it again. I got used to living on the streets, I liked it, I was always
a hell raiser, always getting into fights, stealing cars, whatever, being a rogue and hoodlum. Living on the streets gave me an outlet for all that
energy and kept me out of trouble.
I became a loner and started to learn things about the spirit. I was stung by a hive of yellow jackets when I was a young boy and died for a few
minutes. I had done a lot of drugs growing up trying to figure out where I went when I died because it was not like anything I had ever heard about.
Living on the streets, having given up everything and everyone finally took me there so it was like everything bad in my life had been for good
I don't not discount you potential contributions to science given your training, whatever that is, you have never stated it. But you don't seem to
know your place, which is in the lab. Clearly when it comes to constructive criticism, you suck at it. After all, weren’t you the one who got
everyone upset, even got two of my posts removed and this thread temporally shut down because you were claiming I was really Bobby Fontaine and not
Clandestiny, which is who I am, but you said I was not, until you went to facebook and clarified that I am. It was like you were saying I was trying
to pretend I was this smart guy named Bobby Fontaine. Then when you found out that Clandestiny is not my real name, that Bobby Fontaine is, so now
Bobby Fontaine is a moron too.