It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I did not read this thread...
...but you guys DO realize NASA is bombing this area to have a clear place to start a moon base in 20 years, right?
I am really sorry that its original beauty will be gone.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
At least there won't be any complaints about impinging on some endangered fish species' habitats, or anything like that.....
Apollo 14 S-IVB Impact Crater
The Apollo impact velocity was 2.54 km/sec and an angle of 69° from the horizontal along a heading of 103° (west to east). The S-IVB had a mass of 14,016 kg (30835 lbs) at the time of impact and impact energy was 5.54 x 1010 J (equivalent to just over 10 tons of TNT). The signal from the impact was recorded on the Apollo 12 seismometer; it lasted for about 3 hours. The LCROSS impactor (Centaur upper stage) is much smaller than the S-IVB and thus will make a smaller crater. The Centaur weighs about 2000 kg and will impact with a velocity of about 2.5 km/sec.
I actually think what this is is a test of the new weapon that... (laughing) I think it's a test of the new weapon that we learned about yesterday, the Massive Ordnance Penetrator, the MOP.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
I wouldn't cry over the crater Crabeus. There certainly are many, many other beautiful craters to lay claim to.
At least there won't be any complaints about impinging on some endangered fish species' habitats, or anything like that.....
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984A small probe cannot work out the percentage of water in the surface of the Moon for a couple of reasons.
1) We need a large sample, rovers can only take small samples
2) The missle is aiming for a shadow covered area, probes tend to need solar power to keep going.
3) Sheer cost. This is a minor point compared to the others but have you noticed we're in a bit of a financial crisis on Earth at the moment? This way is cheaper.
To clarify, this method is more effective and cheaper.
Europa is thought to have an ocean underneath the ice crust caused by tidal heating caused by it's interaction with Jupiter. It is possibly one of the best chances of finding life elsewhere in our solar system. Therefore we cannot risk contaminating the liquid ocean (if there is one) with Earth bound microbes. They are still discussing ways of getting into the ocean with a sterile craft.
Any craft we send there would also be a little more advanced than a simple "crack the crust" machine but in the end we need to explore the local moons and planets before we head further out. A lunar base would help that.
By once again bringing explosives into this you show you are ignoring all evidence to the contrary. To be rude is to offend, there is no one on the Moon or Mars to offend. They are dead lumps of rock. It would be like getting annoyed because i threw a pebble at a cliff face. So please stop with this "i come in peace" nonsense. There is no one there to be peaceful to so that line of thought is a dead end.
As for Mars, well the difference is that the water is thought to be more concentrated. Therefore we can use rovers to take samples and confirm. The thing about the moon is we need to figure out how much water is in a large volume of lunar dust and we need to make sure it isn't an isolated pocket. So a nice big sample means we can take an average per kilogram.